Foxx Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) de lu sion al https://twitter.com/Shem_Infinite/status/1206367425224163334 Edited December 16, 2019 by Foxx 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1206567283939848192 https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1206380218115645440 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: They really nailed every empty Democratic cliche in that letter, didn't they? Close, they didn't slip in a "speaking truth to power" line... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) fair.... https://twitter.com/B5074616546/status/1206658150079901696 Edited December 16, 2019 by Foxx 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Foxx said: de lu sion al https://twitter.com/Shem_Infinite/status/1206367425224163334 "But they have to call new witnesses, because the House was obstructed by Trump and couldn't hear from these witnesses!" That'll be the excuse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: "But they have to call new witnesses, because the House was obstructed by Trump and couldn't hear from these witnesses!" That'll be the excuse. i'd tell 'im that the House should have filed with the court to get resolution. in fact, they still have that opportunity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 14 hours ago, Hedge said: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Trump: No due process, it’s unfair !! McConnell: We shouldn’t have a due process!! What scum people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Dershowitz and many Rs have tried to conflate maladministration and abuse of power. The Framers rejected maladministration—being ineffective or inefficient—as grounds for impeachment. In contrast, they saw abuse of power as central to the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanors. 2:20 PM · Dec 16, 2019·Twitter for iPhone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 ....of course Photo Op Chuckie weighs in.......another gem on our long list of downstate NYS political skanks......and the list is LONG...SMH......just love this state..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 29 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Dershowitz and many Rs have tried to conflate maladministration and abuse of power. The Framers rejected maladministration—being ineffective or inefficient—as grounds for impeachment. In contrast, they saw abuse of power as central to the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanors. 2:20 PM · Dec 16, 2019·Twitter for iPhone ...Alan Dershowitz included in a sentence citing "and many Republicans"?.....He's been a Dem supporting lib from day one, yet it is quite interesting to see his assessments of this mess as an anti-impeachment advocate, etc......how come?........Tibs nausea?.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 minute ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...Alan Dershowitz included in a sentence citing "and many Republicans"?.....He's been a Dem supporting lib from day one, yet it is quite interesting to see his assessments of this mess as an anti-impeachment advocate, etc......how come?........Tibs nausea?.......... Alan is a very useful tool for the side that's writing his fee cheque 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Rudy G, at the very least, should be called to testify. Barr, too, he was in on this. All this screaming about this not being fair? Well, stop hiding the truth, let these clowns testify. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 On 12/15/2019 at 2:41 PM, row_33 said: Never understood why the coyote felt riding on the rocket was a good move at best there was going to be that sudden stop at the end of the ride Well ol Slim didn't seem to care: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Rudy G, at the very least, should be called to testify. Barr, too, he was in on this. All this screaming about this not being fair? Well, stop hiding the truth, let these clowns testify. You want the Attorney General to testify to the Senate about why he’s doing his job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: You want the Attorney General to testify to the Senate about why he’s doing his job? tibs can... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 58 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Rudy G, at the very least, should be called to testify. Barr, too, he was in on this. All this screaming about this not being fair? Well, stop hiding the truth, let these clowns testify. Why? What useful information would they be able to provide? I thought the only acceptable witnesses were those who could give speculation about third-hand hearsay accounts based on their feelz. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 (edited) so... if i understand this correctly, ***** u schumer wants to call his witnesses but doesn't want Repubs to call any witnesses. in what god forsaken reality do these dimwits reside? i say let both sides call whatever witnesses they want and let the cards fall where they may. let the truth out or at least let any and all questions thereof, that might be the truth out so it can be examined in the light. what are the Dems afraid of? lets make this whole thing into an examination of all things 2016 related so we can once and for all put it behind us and move forward with correcting the wrongs. Schumer says he wants impeachment trial focused on facts, not 'conspiracy theories,' as he balks at GOP calling witnesses Edited December 17, 2019 by Foxx 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Obviously, the founding fathers would have sided with the Democrats in this. They were against allowing foreign influence in our elections and the stone walking and obstruction by a branch of government. Trump has to turn over documents and allow witnesses to testify, and the Senate or Judge Roberts need to uphold their oath to the constitution Trump is is against a republican form of government, checks and balances, our security forces and the rule of law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: #orangemanbad blah blah blah no. when there is a dispute between the two branches of government, it is up to the third branch, in this case the Judiciary to settle the dispute. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 6 minutes ago, Foxx said: no. when there is a dispute between the two branches of government, it is up to the third branch, in this case the Judiciary to settle the dispute. Correct It’s absolutely stunning how ignorant people are of how our government is structured. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 7 minutes ago, Foxx said: no. when there is a dispute between the two branches of government, it is up to the third branch, in this case the Judiciary to settle the dispute. The People decides with the Karl Malone's Atomic Elbow on the Zeke-ish Dems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 LOLOLOLOLOL....Turtle smirkin + trollin at :42 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 35 minutes ago, Foxx said: no. when there is a dispute between the two branches of government, it is up to the third branch, in this case the Judiciary to settle the dispute. That's why Roberts needs to do his duty to the Constitution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: If they really have overwhelming evidence, why do we need to hear from ANY witnesses? Just send this evidence to the Senate, and let them vote.. Edited December 17, 2019 by Cinga 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Democrats are going to try to “Kavanaugh” the Impeachment Trial with new accusations The most dangerous place on earth, Bob Dole wisely observed, is between Chuck Schumer and the TV cameras. Not surprisingly, while Mitch McConnell usually gets his way, Schumer gets the headlines and TV coverage. Schumer did that again today with his demand for a “fair” trial, meaning to Schumer that Democrats get to reopen the investigation of Trump during the trial, including calling witnesses who did not testify, and doing the job the House Democrats failed to do. A do-over. That’s not usually the way trials work — the pleading of claims and discovery takes place before the trial. House Democrats chose not to do that for key witnesses they wanted — including John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney — because forcing them to testify in the House would have meant court litigation. Democrats were on a timetable driven by the 2020 election that did not allow for a court to decide the clash of branches, so they went with what they had. Schumer and Senate Democrats know that what the House had is not enough to get 20 Republican Senators to vote against Trump — they may not even get one. So the trial takes on a different purpose — to seek evidence and to prolong impeachment investigations for the remainder of the election year based on “new evidence” discovered during the trial. Byron York astutely observes that Senate Democrats are taking the same approach they took in trying to block Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination: . 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 They'll have to votes in the house to move it to the Senate. I doubt there will be many defectors as the pressure of party outweighs significantly the pressure of constituency from which they are very insulated IMO. However, I've been wrong on political outcomes several times. They can't turn back. That's a far worse scenario politically than the narrative that Republicans in the Senate made a sham of a serious matter and have created a constitutional crisis and are threatening our national security. That plus the fact that Trump was impeached will become their ammo in 2020. It helps them control the media narrative and will provide some cover over what Barr and Durham are doing. Pelosi will tell her baby chicks in swing districts that this enhances their re-election hopes and will keep the dems in the majority in the House. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Just now, keepthefaith said: They'll have to votes in the house to move it to the Senate. I doubt there will be many defectors as the pressure of party outweighs significantly the pressure of constituency from which they are very insulated IMO. However, I've been wrong on political outcomes several times. They can't turn back. That's a far worse scenario politically than the narrative that Republicans in the Senate made a sham of a serious matter and have created a constitutional crisis and are threatening our national security. That plus the fact that Trump was impeached will become their ammo in 2020. It helps them control the media narrative and will provide some cover over what Barr and Durham are doing. Pelosi will tell her baby chicks in swing districts that this enhances their re-election hopes and will keep the dems in the majority in the House. the Senate began it's investigation for Watergate before the House voted on impeachment it's the amazing part and parcel of how Nixon was not impeached, the clear worst of the 4 to undergo the process, by a million miles... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: the Senate began it's investigation for Watergate before the House voted on impeachment it's the amazing part and parcel of how Nixon was not impeached, the clear worst of the 4 to undergo the process, by a million miles... Trump is worse than Nixon, Dick didn't try to interfere in an election using foreign powers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Andrew Johnson wasn't trying to steel an election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Trump is worse than Nixon, Dick didn't try to interfere in an election using foreign powers Neither did Trump. Obama and Hillary on the other hand, are responsible for the steele dossier. Which they paid to have foriegn powers dig up dirt on a presidential candidate. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 minute ago, westside2 said: Neither did Trump. Obama and Hillary on the other hand, are responsible for the steele dossier. Which they paid to have foriegn powers dig up dirt on a presidential candidate. No, Trump even admitted it. Idiot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Albwan said: LOLOLOLOLOL....Turtle smirkin + trollin at :42 the only thing that would make this better would be if they had a split screen with Nancy's facial expressions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Tiberius said: blah blah blah #orangemanbad blah blah blah i'm sorry but that is not how it works. it is up to either the Executive branch or the Legislative branch to submit the dispute to the Judiciary (not solely the Chief Justice). the Judicial can not insert itself of it's own volition. additionally, i really, really do not think the Dems would want a Constitutional Convention opened up. they should seriously think long and hard about that one.... Edited December 17, 2019 by Foxx 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts