Jump to content

Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Only an absolute moron would say that


when your mom told you daily that she was going to kill you, did you call 911 each day because you took her words literally?

 

its clear trump was talking about this ridiculous topic as phony.  The notion that somehow he’s violating a word (not a clause mind you, a singular word) in the constitution or doing anything remotely untoward is patently ridiculous. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dubs said:


when your mom told you daily that she was going to kill you, did you call 911 each day because you took her words literally?

 

its clear trump was talking about this ridiculous topic as phony.  The notion that somehow he’s violating a word (not a clause mind you, a singular word) in the constitution or doing anything remotely untoward is patently ridiculous. 
 

 

Not ridiculous at all, he's taking money from foreign governments 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's very, very simple. 

 

The United States Intelligence Community had him under the most invasive surveillance for over a full calendar year -- and then had another year and a half of unlimited subpoena and investigatory power. During that time the mission at hand wasn't just to find out about Trump/Russia and the '16 election, but to find any crime or wrong doing they could use to unseat him. After all that investigation -- they found: 

 

* That he slept / paid for a porn star and playmate before he was in office

* That he possibly obstructed justice of a crime that did not exist/happen

 

That's it. Nothing else was found despite the digging and illegal surveillance and investigation. Had Trump not paid a parking ticket, you would have seen front page story after front page story -- let alone had he done anything corrupt they could pin him with. 

 

That's the true legacy of Mueller's probe which no one in the media will touch because it destroys the narrative they've programmed into your head for three years -- not only that he committed treason (didn't happen), but that he's the most corrupt person ever to be in office. The reality is, he's cleaner than ANYONE who was looking into him. He's cleaner than Obama (major corruption under his leadership), cleaner than Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer, Ryan, and most of the House, cleaner than Clinton... 

 

They never expected that he would end up being clean. That's why they went all in on fraudulent FISAs and improper/illegal CI investigations into a sitting president. They figured he HAD to be at least as dirty as they, the DC establishment creatures, are.

 

Turns out he's not. 

 

That's not me making assumptions. That's not me stating my opinion. That's what multiple investigations produced. 

 

I agree that the Russia Gate thing was mostly non-sense. I personally believed that the notion that Trump was some Manchurian candidate was silly and although I do believe that his campaign did exchange info and coordinate with Russia in an indirect capacity but that was all done through back channels and through proxies things that wouldn't lead a paper trail and likely there was going to be a fall guy anyway. Overall I thought that at worst there was going to be an Oliver North type to take the fall. That's not to say that Trump's campaign is possibly the first to ever have that type of information exchange with another country but that's another story. 

 

But Trump's corruption isn't tied solely to Russia or Ukraine. It is very obvious to me that Trump is using his office to help his business interests which is a huge form of corruption. Trump vetoed a fairly bi-partisan piece of legislation aimed at stopping a genocide in Yemen and stop arming an Islamic Extremist regime to a government that just so happens to do a lot of business with Trump and his family. It doesn't stop there either. There are numerous examples of Trump giving favors to those who do business with him and his businesses. Even the Muller investigation was a very limited scope investigation where they were just looking into Russian collusion. They didn't look into Trump's business dealing outside of Russia. So to say you think Trump is clean because the Muller report only found somewhat minor things is missing the scope of the investigation and ignoring very real conflicts of interest and overall awful business dealings. 

 

And once again I don't care about the politics, Dems do it too does not justify someone else's corruption. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Hey Gary, Tibs and other members of the re-tard rodeo,  no manner how many times you say it was good, Scot Norwood  was wide right in SB XV


During one NFL post-game film session the kicker missed and the coach cut him on the spot

 

he begged for another chance and the coach said “okay, rewind the tape and see if he makes it this time”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

 

I agree that the Russia Gate thing was mostly non-sense. I personally believed that the notion that Trump was some Manchurian candidate was silly and although I do believe that his campaign did exchange info and coordinate with Russia in an indirect capacity but that was all done through back channels and through proxies things that wouldn't lead a paper trail and likely there was going to be a fall guy anyway. Overall I thought that at worst there was going to be an Oliver North type to take the fall. That's not to say that Trump's campaign is possibly the first to ever have that type of information exchange with another country but that's another story. 

 

But Trump's corruption isn't tied solely to Russia or Ukraine. It is very obvious to me that Trump is using his office to help his business interests which is a huge form of corruption. Trump vetoed a fairly bi-partisan piece of legislation aimed at stopping a genocide in Yemen and stop arming an Islamic Extremist regime to a government that just so happens to do a lot of business with Trump and his family. It doesn't stop there either. There are numerous examples of Trump giving favors to those who do business with him and his businesses. Even the Muller investigation was a very limited scope investigation where they were just looking into Russian collusion. They didn't look into Trump's business dealing outside of Russia. So to say you think Trump is clean because the Muller report only found somewhat minor things is missing the scope of the investigation and ignoring very real conflicts of interest and overall awful business dealings. 

 

And once again I don't care about the politics, Dems do it too does not justify someone else's corruption. 

Does this belief come from a dream? Chrystal Ball? I mean Mueller and his team of democrat lawyers spent $40 million trying to find something on him and they couldn't do it even when they were hoping like hell to find something. But you believe it. Gotcha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Does this belief come from a dream? Chrystal Ball? I mean Mueller and his team of democrat lawyers spent $40 million trying to find something on him and they couldn't do it even when they were hoping like hell to find something. But you believe it. Gotcha.

 

Democrat lawyers? Setting aside that Muller is a Republican. I will just say that this is a belief from how embedded Trump's business ties are with Russia and how well connected he is to Russian Oligarchs and a lot of coincidences that happened timing wise. I acknowledged that this is what I believe and implied that it is speculation. To me it is irrelevant since I don't think he is the only campaign to have back channel communications with foreign entities. The real proof of Trump's corruption stems from his businesses and how many entities funnel money to him through them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

 

Democrat lawyers? Setting aside that Muller is a Republican. I will just say that this is a belief from how embedded Trump's business ties are with Russia and how well connected he is to Russian Oligarchs and a lot of coincidences that happened timing wise. I acknowledged that this is what I believe and implied that it is speculation. To me it is irrelevant since I don't think he is the only campaign to have back channel communications with foreign entities. The real proof of Trump's corruption stems from his businesses and how many entities funnel money to him through them. 


trump is an unwilling dupe for the Commies...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

Trump is just the leader of the Russian Squad consisting of him, Major Gabbard and Comrade Stein.


good thing Dame Hillary is there to point the finger at Trump and other operatives for Russia

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billsfan89 said:

 

But Trump's corruption isn't tied solely to Russia or Ukraine. It is very obvious to me that Trump is using his office to help his business interests which is a huge form of corruption.

 

And if it was corruption, they would have signed him on it through mueller or the house/senate probes. As I stated, the fishing expedition wasn’t solely restrained to Trump/Russia, that was the excuse. Their purview allowed them to look at his entire life during the presidency and before it — answer they found no corruption. 

 

I understand you believe he’s corrupt — that’s been hammered into everyone’s brain for 4 years straight. But there is no evidence to support that claim. 

 

Which is what the probes actually proved. 

34 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

 

Democrat lawyers? Setting aside that Muller is a Republican. I will just say that this is a belief from how embedded Trump's business ties are with Russia and how well connected he is to Russian Oligarchs and a lot of coincidences that happened timing wise. I acknowledged that this is what I believe and implied that it is speculation. To me it is irrelevant since I don't think he is the only campaign to have back channel communications with foreign entities. The real proof of Trump's corruption stems from his businesses and how many entities funnel money to him through them. 

 

Mueller proved he had no backdoor connections or contacts to Russians though. 

 

Nor did anyone on his team. 

 

That’s the findings of not just mueller but the house and senate too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Really, how does the left forgive this and criticize Trump?  How on earth do people hold to that gargantuan cognitive dissonance?

 

TDS has broken people's brains. That's how. 

 

And it's hard to blame them. As you've noted more than once, since the media began this by claiming Trump was a literal Nazi, anything is justified when you're fighting Nazis. Especially hypocrisy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

TDS has broken people's brains. That's how. 

 

And it's hard to blame them. As you've noted more than once, since the media began this by claiming Trump was a literal Nazi, anything is justified when you're fighting Nazis. Especially hypocrisy. 

 

Don't choke on the red pill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

And God forbid they ever call taxes "taking money". 

 

To a leftist, the government can't take money. They own all the fruits of your labor, and you should be damned glad they let you keep enough to feed yourself. You must be punished for being successful in life. It's not fair to the lazy, stupid, and worthless (you know, leftists).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

TDS has broken people's brains. That's how. 

 

And it's hard to blame them. As you've noted more than once, since the media began this by claiming Trump was a literal Nazi, anything is justified when you're fighting Nazis. Especially hypocrisy. 

 

You know who else fought Nazis with hypocritical false accusations?  Hitler.

 

Not even kidding.  Ask Gregor Strasser or Ernst Roehm.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

You know who else fought Nazis with hypocritical false accusations?  Hitler.

 

Not even kidding.  Ask Gregor Strasser or Ernst Roehm.

I would have guessed Stalin

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GG said:

I would have guessed Stalin

 

No, those were hypocritical true accusations. 

 

Katyn Forest aside - kind-of ironic, actually, that hypocritical false accusation was so clumsy that it managed to paint the frickin' Nazis in a good light.  Clearly, Stalin was a leftist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

You know who else fought Nazis with hypocritical false accusations?  Hitler.

 

Not even kidding.  Ask Gregor Strasser or Ernst Roehm.


the state structure was one of deliberate chaos, pitting all factions against each other with rumour and mind games

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • 3 months later...

 

 

Again. 

 

BillsTime ignores PPP administrator.

 

Post has nothing to do with the subject of the thread.   (other than Trump-Bad)

 

 

 

attention.png   This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one. 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2019 at 1:14 PM, Warren Zevon said:

Article I, Section 9

 

"You people with this phony Emoluments Clause" - Donald Trump

 

 

 

 

Bonnie forgets that he is not a moderator here.... and yes, the tweet above has everything to do with the topic.

 

 

image.png.846d93c353fbcb6a24ac870d57601481.png

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Remind me sometime to tell you about my encounter with Dr 420 in Oakland prior to it becoming legal here recreationally.  ***** hoot. 

 

Right? Legalize everything. No more cartels, no more Dr. Feelgoods. The fact that MJ was illegal for so long is just stupid.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...