Jump to content

Ruth Bader Ginsberg has pancreatic cancer


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, CarpetCrawler said:

Who in the Administration said they wouldn't?  BTW, you rail about no honor and classlessness by Republicans, but then say, 'when Scalia croaked', that's why you're thought of as a hypocrite. 

You think they will wait until after the election? Bull 

 

Right now, all we hearing is frogs croaking, lol 

 

Croak 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

You think they will wait until after the election? Bull 

 

Right now, all we hearing is frogs croaking, lol 

 

Croak 

 

...and if Ginsberg unfortunately passed prior to Barry's re-election, the Dems would have waited, right?......give us your Scalia line.....fraud.......

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...and if Ginsberg unfortunately passed prior to Barry's re-election, the Dems would have waited, right?......give us your Scalia line.....fraud.......

 

Well, the idiots on the left didn't like it when the Biden rule was used in 2016, so McConnell should placate them by not invoking it again, should the unfortunate happen.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
45 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


All this is true, stents are replaced  if need be, but it not as routine as they make it. 
 

In a very elderly patient you would try to avoid 

ANY replacement unless you needed to,
to avoid possible infection. 
 

It sounds like she had some blockage which necessitated the revision 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/politics/presiding-justice-rbg-officiates-family-friends-wedding/ar-BB18ySpv?ocid=uxbndlbing

 

This just goes to show that if RBG can officiate a wedding after treatment for cancer at her age, there is no reason why you cannot vote in person. She is the definition of "at risk" with her age and her health issues.

Edited by KRC
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KRC said:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/politics/presiding-justice-rbg-officiates-family-friends-wedding/ar-BB18ySpv?ocid=uxbndlbing

 

This just goes to show that if RBG can officiate a wedding after treatment for cancer at her age, there is no reason why you cannot vote in person. She is the definition of "at risk" with her age and her health issues.

 

And Pelosi is 80 and her stint to the salon sans-mask shows that the people in power don't believe Covid is a threat. 

 

Anyone still locking themselves down after these two examples are happy being serfs. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2020 at 3:44 PM, Tiberius said:

Exactly, no honor on your side at all. Do as you clowns say not as you do. 

 

Republicans are just classless 

 

This is why Dems should move quickly and add PR and DC as states, 

If DC became a state, would they need to elect a governor? How would you parse out duties between the governor and the mayor of a 1 city state? This was legitimately my shower thought this morning 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

If DC became a state, would they need to elect a governor? How would you parse out duties between the governor and the mayor of a 1 city state? This was legitimately my shower thought this morning 😂

Well, glad you showered off that dirty thought. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

If DC became a state, would they need to elect a governor? How would you parse out duties between the governor and the mayor of a 1 city state? This was legitimately my shower thought this morning 😂

It would be a City-State, so governor and Mayer would be one and the same, maybe. ?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...