Jump to content

Civil War


Recommended Posts

So with the fracturing of the country the past few years this term has been thrown out there a lot (quite flippantly I might add) lately.  I have no idea if we'd ever come to blows but here are my questions.  What would it look like?  What would be the outcome? What would the country look like if the left won and what would the country look like if right won.  I really don't this this would ever happen but it is scary that it's even bandied about.  Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

Nobody would "win" if there was a Civil War

 

Agreed. It would be ugly and there would be no winners. Regardless of who "won," the outcomes would be pretty similar. Suppression of the other side. Forcing their ideology on the other side. No wiggle room. No compromise.

 

However, if I were to pick a side, I would pick the side with the guns.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KRC said:

 

Agreed. It would be ugly and there would be no winners. Regardless of who "won," the outcomes would be pretty similar. Suppression of the other side. Forcing their ideology on the other side. No wiggle room. No compromise.

 

However, if I were to pick a side, I would pick the side with the guns.

 

Well that is my thought as well.  Not only are many of the gun owners right leaning so is much of the military.  

 

And "won/win/winners" is likely not a great concept as yes this would be horrible and one one wins in a horror.  However what I was getting at was what might the end results look like?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

Agreed. It would be ugly and there would be no winners. Regardless of who "won," the outcomes would be pretty similar. Suppression of the other side. Forcing their ideology on the other side. No wiggle room. No compromise.

 

However, if I were to pick a side, I would pick the side with the guns.

 

I'd pick the side with the media.

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

However what I was getting at was what might the end results look like?  

 

A lot of destruction. The left has shown that they are willing to literally burn everything down to get back in power. The right would ***** them up with superior weaponry. I think that the escalations now are a result of the right finally showing a backbone and standing up to the bullying of the left. They are used to people backing down. Then they ran into Trump and he is not going to put up with it. That is emboldening the right to fight back against the bullying.

 

End result: scorched earth.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

 

However, if I were to pick a side, I would pick the side with the guns.

No, the pen is mightier than the sword. How would this happen? Terrorist acts. No one, left or right, is going to support terrorism. It will begin and end with idiots blowing something up and the law putting them in jail while the terrorists look weak, stupid and isolated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, the pen is mightier than the sword. How would this happen? Terrorist acts. No one, left or right, is going to support terrorism. It will begin and end with idiots blowing something up and the law putting them in jail while the terrorists look weak, stupid and isolated. 

 

Antifa and BLM say 'Hi!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

They have not committed acts of terrorism. 

 

The Nazis, "You won't replace us" crowd and Trump supporters have. Tim McVeigh 

 

They absolutely have committed multiple acts of terrorism.   {Wonders why he is even wasting his time with TOC}

Edited by KRC
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Antifa and other leftist extremists will likely be the flashpoint.

 

There would be a short and bloody response, with many killed.

 

and a quick response by the elite media (as Tom mentions)  condemning all things American.

 

 

 

Wait a few years..................Lather, rinse, repeat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are likely to just fracture.  Stronger states rights and limited federal powers could get us there incrementally.  With remote white collar work being such a potential equalizer, I can see big expensive cities being hollowed out and States getting further and further apart culturally and politically.  I think that would be the best possible outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

Agreed. It would be ugly and there would be no winners. Regardless of who "won," the outcomes would be pretty similar. Suppression of the other side. Forcing their ideology on the other side. No wiggle room. No compromise.

 

However, if I were to pick a side, I would pick the side with the guns.

 

John Brown Gun Club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RochesterRob said:

  Explain your line of reasoning so I can understand.

 

The war's not going to be fought by large units of well-equipped ground troops engaged in high-tech Clausewitzian-style fighting.  It'll be more Maoist in style.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

The war's not going to be fought by large units of well-equipped ground troops engaged in high-tech Clausewitzian-style fighting.  It'll be more Maoist in style.

  OK, but should it not be easy for the military to silence the media in the early stages of a civil war?  Maybe I should not assume this but most likely the military will align with a right wing political body?  Will it be a matter that the rank and file of the military really is not right wing in nature and will resist orders that puts them at odds with non-rightists.  Thinking of people who joined out of high school because they have no place to go or ones that are using it for college purposes or general civilian trades.  Ones that look at the military as an avenue as opposed to an ideal or a way of life.  I'm far enough removed from youth that I don't get a lot of cross talk on new enlistments/ROTC anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  OK, but should it not be easy for the military to silence the media in the early stages of a civil war?  Maybe I should not assume this but most likely the military will align with a right wing political body?  Will it be a matter that the rank and file of the military really is not right wing in nature and will resist orders that puts them at odds with non-rightists.  Thinking of people who joined out of high school because they have no place to go or ones that are using it for college purposes or general civilian trades.  Ones that look at the military as an avenue as opposed to an ideal or a way of life.  I'm far enough removed from youth that I don't get a lot of cross talk on new enlistments/ROTC anymore.

To destroy the first amendment (free press) you'd have to knock out all the power in the country because the media is everywhere. Not sure how'd you'd get an organized national force together to take on law enforcement, the national guard and the military. Unless it's a revolution from. Within the government, like Trump tells his supporters there will be no more elections! Rise up my brothers!! Rise up!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  OK, but should it not be easy for the military to silence the media in the early stages of a civil war?  Maybe I should not assume this but most likely the military will align with a right wing political body?  Will it be a matter that the rank and file of the military really is not right wing in nature and will resist orders that puts them at odds with non-rightists.  Thinking of people who joined out of high school because they have no place to go or ones that are using it for college purposes or general civilian trades.  Ones that look at the military as an avenue as opposed to an ideal or a way of life.  I'm far enough removed from youth that I don't get a lot of cross talk on new enlistments/ROTC anymore.

 

I think if the conservatives just sit tight the progs will eat their own, and the problem will fix itself.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

Who attached the detention center, who attacked Andy Ngo, ?

 

https://nypost.com/2019/07/17/liberals-cheer-as-antifa-violence-escalates/

That's a long way from Tim McVeigh the synagogue shooting in Pittsburg, the church shooting in South Carolina and the sending of bombs by a Trump supporter

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Whatever happens, I just don't want to be stuck with the side that gets NYC. ?

Ya, remember 9-11 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

I think if the conservatives just sit tight the progs will eat their own, and the problem will fix itself.

  I see the progressives splinter into factions based on their personal objectives and an unwillingness to work with others under the auspices of a single party.  Too divided to spark a civil war but who knows for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

To destroy the first amendment (free press) you'd have to knock out all the power in the country because the media is everywhere. Not sure how'd you'd get an organized national force together to take on law enforcement, the national guard and the military. Unless it's a revolution from. Within the government, like Trump tells his supporters there will be no more elections! Rise up my brothers!! Rise up!! 

  There are so many avenues for a civil war to follow who knows.  I'm not talking about destroying the First Amendment but selected trimming at first such as blocking the letter networks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

No, the pen is mightier than the sword. How would this happen? Terrorist acts. No one, left or right, is going to support terrorism. It will begin and end with idiots blowing something up and the law putting them in jail while the terrorists look weak, stupid and isolated. 

 

Wanna put it to the test? You bring a pen and I’ll bring a sword. 

 

 

 

The real winners of a shooting civil war in this country is the Chinese or whoever comes to mop up what’s left. 

 

 

A real and true civil war would have to  start with some big shocking thing like nuclear explosions, or an EMP- has anyone seen Jericho? It could be something like that. 

Edited by whatdrought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Wanna put it to the test? You bring a pen and I’ll bring a sword. 

 

 

 

The real winners of a shooting civil war in this country is the Chinese or whoever comes to mop up what’s left. 

 

 

A real and true civil war would have to  start with some big shocking thing like nuclear explosions, or an EMP- has anyone seen Jericho? It could be something like that. 

In a war, information is just as important, if not more so, than weapons. 

 

And if you mean personally, no I'd use the gun and get you before you had any information about where I was, lol 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

That's a long way from Tim McVeigh the synagogue shooting in Pittsburg, the church shooting in South Carolina and the sending of bombs by a Trump supporter

Ya, remember 9-11 

 

The difference is the perp was inept thankfully.  Had he been able to explode that propane tank it would be a different story.

 

What about the congressional baseball field shootings.  Were they terrorism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

In a war, information is just as important, if not more so, than weapons. 

 

And if you mean personally, no I'd use the gun and get you before you had any information about where I was, lol 

 

 

 

Information is only important if you have the recourses to use it. 

 

 

14 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

The difference is the perp was inept thankfully.  Had he been able to explode that propane tank it would be a different story.

 

What about the congressional baseball field shootings.  Were they terrorism?

 

No- according to tibs that was just some random occurrence. Not terrorism at all because it doesn’t fit the narrative. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...