wppete Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) QB, Josh Allen score was 37 Anyone wants to try it for fun here you go..... https://samplewonderlictest.com/ Edited April 22, 2019 by wppete 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 i got all 15 right on the mini-quiz, i wouldn't make a good QB though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Are their bigger cowards than anonymous sources? These guys talk real reckless about 21 years old when they can’t even put their name on it. You can hear the bitterness of how these guys lives turned out in this comments. And it’s overrated but I’m really starting to like Butler. I hope he makes it to the 2nd. 13 hours ago, whatdrought said: JJ Arcega-Whiteside is a guy who, if he was there in the third, I’d be happy with. Just seems like a poor mans AJ Green where you know you’re gonna get 50-60 catches, 800 yards, and a couple great contested TDs each year. Seens like a perfect fit for what we have right now. Do you know about his times in the shuttle? I love Stanford guys but he seemed more like a jump ball guy than actual starting nfl receiver. 13 hours ago, Turk71 said: I don't think it is off base to be skeptical of Metcalf and the hype surrounding him. The game of football is not being played at the combine or in the weight room. This is where I’m at at. I just saw a show with him and he seems like a great dude but I think people are in love with stuff that doesn’t matter in being a successful receiver. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 14 hours ago, Logic said: I always love reading this stuff, and I'm sure there are plenty of kernels of truth. On the other side of the coin, though, is this: That may apply 98% of the time to the rubes and Rodaks of the world--but McGinn's the 2% exception to the rule. He's a bonafide legend and probably the best guy in the business for getting scouts to spill the real beans off the record. Are some still blowing smoke up his chimney? Probably, but he's savvy enough to know when that's happening... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Formerly Allan in MD Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 15 hours ago, Gugny said: Wonderlic only matters when it comes to QBs. All of these QBs scored well. Wrong! If you're not too bright you may not be very coachable. And everyone needs to know the playbook, aside from quarterbacks. Conversely, if quarterbacks must do well on Wonderlic to be successful, how does one explain someone like Terry Bradshaw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Just now, Formerly Allan in MD said: Wrong! If you're not too bright you may not be very coachable. And everyone needs to know the playbook, aside from quarterbacks. Conversely, if quarterbacks must do well on Wonderlic to be successful, how does one explain someone like Terry Bradshaw? Different era. Also, Steel Curtain defense, Franco Harris, Lynn Swann, and John Stallworth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 15 minutes ago, Formerly Allan in MD said: Wrong! If you're not too bright you may not be very coachable. And everyone needs to know the playbook, aside from quarterbacks. Conversely, if quarterbacks must do well on Wonderlic to be successful, how does one explain someone like Terry Bradshaw? There is a clear cutoff between 2000-present and 1999 and earlier, with regard to the ability for the Wonderlic to be somewhat predictive when it comes to POSSIBLE quarterback success. Bradshaw, Marino and Kelly were collectively about as smart as a piece of driftwood. It was a different NFL, then. I agree that a very low score for, say, a CB, would be troublesome. I've only looked into QBs' scores and whether they've been successful. I haven't looked at other positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 39 minutes ago, eball said: Different era. Also, Steel Curtain defense, Franco Harris, Lynn Swann, and John Stallworth. He was before my time and I know he was the QB of 4 SB winners, but his numbers kinda sucked. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTe00.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 15 hours ago, Turk71 said: I don't think it is off base to be skeptical of Metcalf and the hype surrounding him. The game of football is not being played at the combine or in the weight room. In fairness, Metcalf was considered a 1st or 2nd round prospect even before the season.........if you follow it he had adamant supporters from the get-go..........he didn't jump up 3-5 rounds because of his combine workout. In HIS case the 40 time just explained and verified the kinda' ridiculous tape where he is just blowing DB's away on deep routes. The clean bill of health was the most important thing.............because the biggest question with him has to be durability. His "floor" is "can't stay healthy". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: In fairness, Metcalf was considered a 1st or 2nd round prospect even before the season.........if you follow it he had adamant supporters from the get-go..........he didn't jump up 3-5 rounds because of his combine workout. In HIS case the 40 time just explained and verified the kinda' ridiculous tape where he is just blowing DB's away on deep routes. The clean bill of health was the most important thing.............because the biggest question with him has to be durability. His "floor" is "can't stay healthy". But wasn’t it more because of his physical attributes? He had 39 catches last year. He was having a better season this year but broke his neck. I’m not totally against him but there are a ton of red flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: But wasn’t it more because of his physical attributes? He had 39 catches last year. He was having a better season this year but broke his neck. I’m not totally against him but there are a ton of red flags. No doubt he is a huge risk based on what we know right now. While there are cautionary tales for sure about workout warriors not all low producing freak talents fail. Josh Allen is one we obviously hope doesn't. But for Metcalf the more apt comparison to me is Jevon Kearse. I had him as the second best player in the 1999 draft. He played LB and didn't produce much in a scheme that wasn't suited to his skills. I see Metcalf the same way. The system and QB's he had didn't really mesh with his strengths so you have to project. I was sweating bullets as Kearse fell toward the Bill but to my devastation the long-middling Tennessee Titans snatched him up at pick #16 and he went on to help propel that lifeless franchise to a SB appearance and another year with the best record in the AFC. A freak talent like that can be the difference between staying on the porch and running with the big dogs. Antoine Winfield was a nice consolation prize and had a long, quality career but he never had near the impact on the league that "The Freak" had in those first 3 years where he was arguably the most feared defensive player in football. Imagine him playing in Wade Phillips 3-4 instead of as an undersized DE in Greggo's D. We have a lot of folks on here who worry about "not making a profit" with the first round pick. But the objective isn't to be 9-7...........you might save your job for a year or two doing that as a HC but you will most certainly go broke if you don't do A LOT better. The objective is to be great. I've long believed that the Bills will only break thru by force of talent.......and I certainly don't expect McD to ever be able to match wits with BB............an overwhelming roster with a lot of matchup winners is the best chance to get there. Edited April 22, 2019 by BADOLBILZ 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Formerly Allan in MD said: Wrong! If you're not too bright you may not be very coachable. And everyone needs to know the playbook, aside from quarterbacks. Conversely, if quarterbacks must do well on Wonderlic to be successful, how does one explain someone like Terry Bradshaw? what exactly do you mean about Terry? He has done a great job playing his role on football panels for decades now, almost completed a full smacking of Letterman's face one night (too bad he held back....) he called his own plays as well, that eliminates another party yelling at you and you having to figure out what they really meant when the shotclock was winding down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 4 hours ago, row_33 said: i got all 15 right on the mini-quiz, i wouldn't make a good QB though Sure ya did. No pic then it didn’t happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: "Rashan Gary whose started his Own Agency" In a tweet about a low Wonderlic score? Chad must be going for a Darwin award... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk71 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 8 hours ago, wppete said: QB, Josh Allen score was 37 Anyone wants to try it for fun here you go..... https://samplewonderlictest.com/ 48. https://samplewonderlictest.com/result/636249 That wasn't really that much fun.? You have to go really fast. They should have all the questions on the same page. My QB days are long over, maybe I could be a clock management consultant. 1 hour ago, Lurker said: "Rashan Gary whose started his Own Agency" In a tweet about a low Wonderlic score? Chad must be going for a Darwin award... He thinks whose is a contraction for 'who has'. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdamit Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: my nephew played with him in high school. every one said he was a good team mate. also said he was cocky and really wants to be a giant . he also told a funny story about the time during his freshaman year they let him play running back for one play. He was so much bigger then everyone else he ran for 85 yards on his first carry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Since we don’t need a QB, I really am not too concerned about these scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 10 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said: No doubt he is a huge risk based on what we know right now. While there are cautionary tales for sure about workout warriors not all low producing freak talents fail. Josh Allen is one we obviously hope doesn't. But for Metcalf the more apt comparison to me is Jevon Kearse. I had him as the second best player in the 1999 draft. He played LB and didn't produce much in a scheme that wasn't suited to his skills. I see Metcalf the same way. The system and QB's he had didn't really mesh with his strengths so you have to project. I was sweating bullets as Kearse fell toward the Bill but to my devastation the long-middling Tennessee Titans snatched him up at pick #16 and he went on to help propel that lifeless franchise to a SB appearance and another year with the best record in the AFC. A freak talent like that can be the difference between staying on the porch and running with the big dogs. Antoine Winfield was a nice consolation prize and had a long, quality career but he never had near the impact on the league that "The Freak" had in those first 3 years where he was arguably the most feared defensive player in football. Imagine him playing in Wade Phillips 3-4 instead of as an undersized DE in Greggo's D. We have a lot of folks on here who worry about "not making a profit" with the first round pick. But the objective isn't to be 9-7...........you might save your job for a year or two doing that as a HC but you will most certainly go broke if you don't do A LOT better. The objective is to be great. I've long believed that the Bills will only break thru by force of talent.......and I certainly don't expect McD to ever be able to match wits with BB............an overwhelming roster with a lot of matchup winners is the best chance to get there. Eh you may be right. Some of us (myself included) probably need to stop opining that McBeane can’t afford to be taking risks - you’re probably more correct in saying that they can’t afford NOT to... Kearse is an interesting comp - freak was a great name for him - I remember him chasing down receivers 25 yards downfield, he played with his hair on fire when he came into the league. If only Clowney had Kearse’s mentality... But back to Metcalf, man I don’t see it. I see the explosiveness sure, but he is so stiff and has decent (at best) hands... if they’re focused on adding an explosive playmaker on offense why not take Hollywood Brown, he can take the top off of a defense and has shown legit production... Metcalf just doesn’t seem built for the modern game, to me. But you’re right about the concept - a bunch of Jonah Williams or Christian Wilkins drafts will get you fired, ultimately, even if you get to join the Dick Jauron Genial Ex-Coach Alumni Group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avisan Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 8 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Sure ya did. No pic then it didn’t happen. They aren't particularly difficult questions, the majority of the difficulty comes from the time crunch and the wonkiness of some of the word association questions For the most part it's like 7th grade level algebra with the equation setup packaged in a cute little paragraph with a red herring or two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts