Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

https://amgreatness.com/2019/05/20/why-did-obama-allow-comey-to-brief-trump-on-the-russian-prostitute-story/#.XOP75AXiI44.twitter

 

Not one journalist has posed a single question to Obama about what officials in his White House knew—or when they knew it—despite multiple ongoing investigations by the Justice Department and on Capitol Hill. The more than decade-long media swoon for the 44th president continues unabated.

 

But Attorney General William Barr might do the work that the news media refuses to do.

 

In an interview with Fox News host Bill Hemmer on Friday, Barr indicated his office is looking into “some very strange developments” that occured between the election and Inauguration Day.

 

One of these events, Barr told Hemmer, was the meeting on January 6, 2017 between President-elect Trump, his transition team, and Obama’s top intelligence chiefs, including former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers.

 

One question that Barr and his team should press is why did President Obama, in a meeting the day before, apparently give his blessing for the FBI director to warn the incoming president about the most outlandish accusation contained in the Steele dossier, one that remains unproven to this day. And it could lead to more questions about the handling of the dossier in the Obama White House weeks before Donald Trump was sworn in as president.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

It's a poll, so, grain of salt: 

 


 <_< I'm not sure "most Americans" know what "FISA" is. 

Still, if the Hill is printing this, the internals taken vis-à-vis people who have had enough of government corruption, overreach and spying may be telling the Democrats and/or Republicans something they cannot ignore (although some are trying!). 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/444884-christopher-steeles-nugget-of-fools-gold-was-easily-disproven-but-fbi#.XOSIkSsZDXM.twitter

 

 

In other words, before the FBI and its director, James Comey, swore to the FISA court on Oct. 21, 2016, that they had verified the FISA warrant application and deemed Steele a credible informant with no known derogatory information, the government knew:

  • Steele had told senior Justice official Bruce Ohr he was “desperate” to defeat Trump and was working in some capacity for the Clinton campaign;
     
  • he leaked his dossier to the news media;
     
  • he offered demonstrably false intelligence, such as the Alfa pings and an allegation given to Kavalec that Russian hackers were being paid by a nonexistent Russian consulate in Miami.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric, You're driving down the highway using your rear view mirror to figure out how to stay in your lane. 

Whatever you do, don't look ahead through the windshield to see what's coming. 

You'll do fine just knowing where you've been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Correct: 

 

Each also is dealing with an elephant that’s not just in the room but sitting uncomfortably in their laps. Christopher Steele’s dossier is clearly a Russian intelligence operation (“active measure” in IC-speak) that took advantage of a cooperative outreach by the Hillary Clinton campaign.   

 

If these IC leaders didn’t recognize it as such, then it truly was amateur hour at the top. The more troubling scenario would be if each made a conscious decision to ignore the obvious Russian interference attempt and, instead, wring political value out of the dossier.  

 

This is a key area that deserves Durham’s attention. After all, this Russian active measures operation was used to further an FBI counterintelligence investigation against American citizens, and even secure a court order to electronically intercept former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

You mean, "Don't obfuscate with facts and details?"  @Tiberius

Yes, that's what I meant but I wanted to use words that even HAHA Gator might have a chance of understanding.

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

I think I'm going to order some chicken wings 

What, to go along with your chicken heart, bird brain and chickenshit?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

That's why we need the investigation. To see what he is covering up? Duh!!

I love that this is all getting put off so all the hearings in the House with Mueller, McGhan, Hicks etc can take place closer to November 2020. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nanker said:

Eric, You're driving down the highway using your rear view mirror to figure out how to stay in your lane. 

Whatever you do, don't look ahead through the windshield to see what's coming. 

You'll do fine just knowing where you've been.

i think that is part of the problem, he really doesn't understand where he's been.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump’s covering up for not having the funds to bankroll the infrastructure plans that they had in the works. 

 

Of course, Nancy holds the “purse strings” and President Donald J. Trump only can sign legislation that both houses pass. So obviously he’s covering up that he refuses to usurp the Legislature’s duty to pass funding for our nation’s needs. The fiend!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Does anyone know what the esteemed Nancy Pelosi was referring to in cover-up?  That Trump is covering up for colluding with Russia or is there something else rattling around in that dormant organ of a brain she has?


There ain't nuthin' rattling around in Nancy's brain except for a few old dust bunnies. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And probably residual botox. 

I take exception to that. For Botox to have traveled to her brain it would mean that it sunk in. We all know It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for something to sink into Pelosi's brain.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...