Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees

[BeginnersMind]

3 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

So, you are bettering the board by shitting all over it? That is some ***** up logic there. ?

 

I attack some things I see as making the board less than it could be. I also post discussion. Don’t believe the story teller in chief. 

Edited May 16, 2019 by BeginnersMind

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, KRC said:

 

So, you are bettering the board by shitting all over it? That is some ***** up logic there. ?

 

He thinks he's a surgeon performing a duty. 

 

Because his masters (to whom he admitted he outsources his opinions and free thinking to because they're "experts" and "authorities") say anyone who doubts Trump/Russia is a Nazi/Putin Supporter/Deplorable, he has taken it on himself to expose these rascals to a public flogging -- because it's the kind thing to do. 

 

This despite the fact his masters have exposed themselves (once again) to be the tip of the propaganda spear in this (dis)information war, proven liars and pushers of baseless conspiracy which he fully believes (since they told him to believe it and he doesn't like thinking for himself). 

 

He's a sad person. A lonely, mentally challenged sycophant who -- when his ideas get exposed as the poison they are, runs away to a new screen name where he can start his medical practice all over again. 

 

I feel bad for him. 

[KRC]

2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

I attack some things. I also post discussion. Don’t believe the story teller in chief. 

 

When you ***** all over the board, while simultaneously call for a better board, you are a hypocrite.

[BeginnersMind]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He thinks he's a surgeon performing a duty. 

 

Because his masters (to whom he admitted he outsources his opinions and free thinking to because they're "experts" and "authorities")

 

Fiction. 

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

say anyone who doubts Trump/Russia is a Nazi/Putin Supporter/Deplorable,

 

Fiction. 

 

Just like all your other made up stories about me. 

 

 

1 minute ago, KRC said:

 

When you ***** all over the board, while simultaneously call for a better board, you are a hypocrite.

 

And when you attack me, you feel you’re doing the board a favor, no?

 

Mirror mirror

[Deranged Rhino]

https://www.amgreatness.com/2019/05/15/the-fisa-footnote-that-could-doom-collusion-hoaxsters/

 

The FISA court approved the FBI’s request, subsequently unleashing the most powerful government surveillance methods possible against Page: “It’s an order by the court to basically monitor that person 24/7, not just tap their phones but to plant microphones and cameras, whatever it takes, to capture their conversations,” explained Kevin Brock, a former FBI intelligence official, in an interview this week.

 

In other words, the FBI, at the behest of Comey, spied on Carter Page for one year.

 

But far from being a legitimate legal petition, the FISA application is an astonishing piece of political propaganda wielded for the most nefarious purposes. A February 2018 memo by Representative Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, revealed how Comey and company cited uncorroborated allegations in the dossier compiled by political operative Christopher Steele as evidence that Page was a traitor and working with the Kremlin to disrupt the election.

 

3 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

When you ***** all over the board, while simultaneously call for a better board, you are a hypocrite.

 

Correct. 

 

But it would take an honest person to admit that. 

 

Which Ben Franklin/BM has proven -- over and over again -- he is NOT. 

[KRC]

4 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

And when you attack me, you feel you’re doing the board a favor, no?

 

Mirror mirror

 

I am not the one calling for a better board. Try again.

Edited May 16, 2019 by KRC

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Correct. 

 

But it would take an honest person to admit that. 

 

Which Ben Franklin/BM has proven -- over and over again -- he is NOT. 

 

You are wasting your time DR

 

BiasedMindset knows whats best for the board.

 

 

 

 

Who Pushed the Dossier, Brennan or Comey?

 

 

 

Who’s going to cut a deal first in Spygate?

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

6 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Fiction. 

 

Fiction. 

 

 

See, it's not though. You change your screen name as many times as you wish -- but that's what you PROUDLY declared back in the early days of Trump Russia. 

 

(click on the linked quotes to go to the conversation -- funny how it's the same words used, the same insults lobbed -- but tell us again you're not BF.)

 

You're just a liar, bro. And you're too dishonest to even admit that. 

 

On 2/16/2017 at 12:16 PM, Benjamin Franklin said:

You don't get it boy blunder.

 

I've only EVER quoted the sources who have higher access than me (but not you amiright?). Neither of us knows 100% for sure if it happened. That's life.

 

I choose to believe the people with opposite motives, who had information access beyond ours, and who publicly reached the conclusion that there was hacking by the Russian government.

 

You choose to believe a limited public data set fueled by a back story of human squabbling in the intel community...to feed your narrative of a conspiracy whose motive is resuming the Cold War or at least the military industrial complex all to the benefit of your version of the Illuminati.

 

My conclusion is based on public record of statements by people who I can hope would know, backed by no personal motive. Your conclusion is backed with limited proof driven by your desire to unravel a conspiratorial story you yearn to believe.

 

On 2/16/2017 at 1:22 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And despite your self described discipline to only listen to people in authority, you still are getting basic facts of the situation wrong. You've wrongly stated that the election was hacked several times in this thread. That is false. Even the IC says so, the same unelected officials you are placing your trust in.

 

There is zero documented evidence that there were any hacks. In fact, the only documented evidence, first hand testimony in fact, says otherwise.

 

This is why you're making a fool out of yourself in these threads. You're uninterested in the facts, only your chosen belief system about what other people said about those facts.

 

That's piss poor researching and piss poor logic.

 

 

See, this is how everyone can tell you're desperate.

 

When I debate with you, I focus on the things you said. But you invent things I said and like to argue those.

 

It's a weak tactic utilized by a weak mind.

 

The facts are clear. And you're spouting falsehoods.

 

Words matter, remember? So either choose the proper words or do better research.

 

 

 

There ya go again. That's an unproven accusation with absolutely zero proof behind it.

 

None. Zip. Zero.

 

You're bad at this.

 

On 2/16/2017 at 3:13 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The clear difference between you and me is that you admit you believe things other people say without doing the due diligence yourself -- so long as they're authorities. So, you're willing to take the words of James Clapper, a man who perjured himself before Congress and who has a clear motive to mislead, as fact without asking for anything more. Me? I like to have evidence before I believe a proven liar. Especially when it comes to this topic which is heavily influenced by disinformation from all sides.

 

When you look for evidence that the DNC was hacked, rather than just taking the words of proven liars pushing an agenda, there is none offered outside unnamed sources citing unnamed methods. Assange has said several times the leaks came from US sources -- the speculation has long been it was Seth Rich. The reason the "hacked" meme is being pushed on the simple minded folk who believe what they're told blindly is because saying the DNC was hacked by a hostile nation not only suits their geopolitical agenda, it looks a hell of a lot better than if it came out that the emails were leaked by one of their own... who was then found murdered.

 

You keep proving over and over again that you do not have the discernment necessary for this discussion. You don't even have the vocabulary. All you are doing is making yourself look uninformed.

 

On 2/16/2017 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Franklin said:

You are in deep on the conspiracy stuff. I love that you dismiss so many accounts with ease then rely on the ever credible Assange.

 

Keep bragging about your deep credibility DR.

 

This groove is getting frayed. You won't respond to my requests for your 9-11 theories but I wish you would. Be proud of who you are DR.

 

[BeginnersMind]

1 minute ago, KRC said:

 

I am not the one calling for a better board. Try again.

 

So you’re just attacking to attack? What motivates you to talk to me? Mine comes with an end in mind: Trying to get away from one guy’s 67 tweets a day, and make some modicum of discussion and civility possible. You can always build your own board!

[Deranged Rhino]

No one attacks you. You're irrelevant down here. 

 

Irrelevant. 

 

People LAUGH at you.

 

Difference. 

[BeginnersMind]

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

See, it's not though. You change your screen name as many times as you wish -- but that's what you PROUDLY declared back in the early days of Trump Russia. 

 

(click on the linked quotes to go to the conversation -- funny how it's the same words used, the same insults lobbed -- but tell us again you're not BF.)

 

You're just a liar, bro. And you're too dishonest to even admit that. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can’t read two gud. 

 

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

No one attacks you. You're irrelevant down here. 

 

Irrelevant. 

 

People LAUGH at you.

 

Difference. 

 

That you have the ego to imply the importance of relevance here at PPP makes one of us sadder. 

 

Peace out brother. Post a tweet or two and keep up your stalking and theories about me. 

Edited May 16, 2019 by BeginnersMind

[KRC]

1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

So you’re just attacking to attack? What motivates you to talk to me? Mine comes with an end in mind: Trying to get away from one guy’s 67 tweets a day, and make some modicum of discussion and civility possible. You can always build your own board!

 

I attack hypocrisy. You are calling for a better board, while at the same time shitting all over it with your crusade. Step down off of your throne and prove that you truly want a better board.

[Deranged Rhino]

You just got exposed as a liar again -- and that's your comeback? 

 

No wonder you change screen names more often than most people change socks. If I had your record of being wrong, I'd run from it too. 

[McGee Return TD]

7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

See, it's not though. You change your screen name as many times as you wish -- but that's what you PROUDLY declared back in the early days of Trump Russia. 

 

(click on the linked quotes to go to the conversation -- funny how it's the same words used, the same insults lobbed -- but tell us again you're not BF.)

 

You're just a liar, bro. And you're too dishonest to even admit that. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You just earned BM/BF $15 by quoting his posts.

[Deranged Rhino]

Screen name switch -- check. 

 

So sad. 

[Buffalo_Gal]

53 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

This thread is worth the read: 

 

Highlighting certain sections: 

 

SOURCE E 

 

 

(snip)

 

(snip)

 

 

 

(snip)

 

 

(and my personal favorite: a Seth Abramson slam)

 

 

Felix Sater was given a plea deal in 2009 and kept out of jail by Loretta Lynch (while she was US attorney for the eastern district of NY).  The deal included sealing his records (for 10 years) and his becoming an FBI informant.  Robert Mueller was FBI director in 2009. 
 

He also had ties to President Trump via NYC real estate development. With friends like that...

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Felix Sater was given a plea deal in 2009 and kept out of jail by Loretta Lynch (while she was US attorney for the eastern district of NY).  The deal included sealing his records (for 10 years) and his becoming an FBI informant.  Robert Mueller was FBI director in 2009. 
 

He also had ties to President Trump via NYC real estate development. With friends like that...

 

You got that right. 

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

(and my personal favorite: a Seth Abramson slam)

 

 

Seth Abramson says a lot of things, most of which suffer from the crippling flaw of being said by Seth Abramson.  He's the Gatorman of Twitter.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

4 or 5 would be: 

Jim Comey

James Baker

Andrew McCabe

Peter Strzok

 

 

Nellie Ohr or Lisa Page (lean towards Ohr over Page). 

 

That's just the DOJ-IG. Durham and Huber have more scope and are looking into departments other than DOJ. Which means you'll likely see a second (and later a third) round of indictments in the summer.

[Buffalo_Gal]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

4 or 5 would be: 

Jim Comey

James Baker

Andrew McCabe

Peter Strzok

 

 

Nellie Ohr or Lisa Page (lean towards Ohr over Page). 

 

That's just the DOJ-IG. Durham and Huber have more scope and are looking into departments other than DOJ. Which means you'll likely see a second (and later a third) round of indictments in the summer.

I think 4 or 5 would be a low number. I can see those 6 plus a few more that may not be front page news right now.

[DC Tom]

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

4 or 5 would be: 

Jim Comey

James Baker

Andrew McCabe

Peter Strzok

 

 

 

I can't wait to see this weasely little ***** do some pound-me-in-the-ass hard time.  

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

I think 4 or 5 would be a low number. I can see those 6 plus a few more that may not be front page news right now.

 

Absolutely possible/likely: Yates, Kortan come to mind immediately for me, I'm not sure they'll do them all in one traunch though. I suspect they're going to space them out a bit, with the full declas coming in between rounds of indictments - but I'm guessing.  

 

I presume Comey will be first because that will be a "unifying" indictment since both the left and right despise him. The full IG report on Comey is going to be damning and leave both sides little room to argue the merits of the indictment. 

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

I can't wait to see this weasely little ***** do some pound-me-in-the-ass hard time.  

 

 

100000%

 

And I hope they do a 4am no-knock raid with Fox News cameras set up early. 

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And I hope they do a 4am no-knock raid with Fox News cameras set up early. 

 

I would laugh.  

 

It would be completely wrong.  But I would still laugh.

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

I would laugh.  

 

It would be completely wrong.  But I would still laugh.

 

Agreed it would be wrong -- but funny as hell. 

(and it was said with a smirk for those who lack senses of humor)

 

I was secretly hoping they'd make the Comey arrest as he left the CNN townhall (or during). That would have made for CNN's best ratings in years. 

[row_33]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Agreed it would be wrong -- but funny as hell. 

(and it was said with a smirk for those who lack senses of humor)

 

I was secretly hoping they'd make the Comey arrest as he left the CNN townhall (or during). That would have made for CNN's best ratings in years. 

 

More airports and morgues would tune in just for that?

 

Edited May 16, 2019 by row_33

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[BeginnersMind]

4 hours ago, KRC said:

 

I attack hypocrisy.

 

That’s weak sauce. Why not make the place better? And if you don’t like me, by all means chase me off. 

 

What I’d like is a somewhat civil discussion board where a quick retort isn’t dialog, made up stuff about posters by the conspiracy wing isn’t constantly repeated, and we discuss the state of things instead of just retweeting stuff. 

 

Like grown ups. 

 

Barring that, I get sucked into the muck too. I’m not better than you. I’m just fighting. 

 

Quote

 

You are calling for a better board, while at the same time shitting all over it with your crusade.

 

I post plenty. You just waded into a few days where I noted DR’s presence and when I do, he loses his mind. I can’t post here without him losing his marbles. 

 

I’ve  invited him out for beers. I’ve proposed we both post here in peace and give each other space. He can’t do it. That’s ok but maybe someday. 

 

Quote

 

Step down off of your throne and prove that you truly want a better board.

 

Step up onto the throne and make it better. I’m happy to follow your lead. 

Edited May 16, 2019 by BeginnersMind

[DC Tom]

2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

That’s weak sauce. Why not make the place better? And if you don’t like me, by all means chase me off. 

 

What I’d like is a somewhat civil discussion board where a quick retort isn’t dialog, made up stuff about posters by the conspiracy wing isn’t constantly repeated, and we discuss the state of things instead of just retweeting stuff. 

 

Like grown ups. 

 

Barring that, I get sucked into the muck too. I’m not better than you. I’m just fighting. 

 

 

I post plenty. You just waded into a few days where I noted DR’s presence and when I do, he loses his mind. I can’t post here without him losing his marbles. 

 

 

Step up onto the throne and make it better. I’m happy to follow your lead. 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

It's the same with him as it always was under his old handles: 

 

"I'm trying to make the board a place filled with conversations by not having any and shitting on anyone who attempts to do so using information I haven't had programmed into my brain by my pre-approved authorities and experts." 

BF/BM et al

[DC Tom]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's the same with him as it always was under his old handles: 

 

"I'm trying to make the board a place filled with conversations by not having any and shitting on anyone who attempts to do so using information I haven't had programmed into my brain by my pre-approved authorities and experts." 

BF/BM et al

 

It's not even that complex.  "I'm trying to make the board a place filled with conversations by telling everyone else they should be having them!"

[BeginnersMind]

 

40 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

It's not even that complex.  "I'm trying to make the board a place filled with conversations by telling everyone else they should be having them!"

 

I accept you for what you are Tom. Hugs.

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

 

I accept you for what you are Tom. Hugs.

 

 

You're an idiot.

[3rdnlng]

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

You're an idiot.

Yes, yes he is for many reasons, but wanting to hug you is over the top.

[Deranged Rhino]

Early glimpse of Barr's interview on Fox tomorrow morning... Barr uses the phrase "it doesn't hang together well" a lot. 

 

 

(meaning the story as to how the investigation began)

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Early glimpse of Barr's interview on Fox tomorrow morning... Barr uses the phrase "it doesn't hang together well" a lot. 

 

 

(meaning the story as to how the investigation began)

I saw that clip too. My take was that Barr is determined to get to the bottom of things.

[Deranged Rhino]

Who could'a guessed it? 

 

(I think this board did Halper work before almost any other place was talking about him btw)

 

 

 

Also: 

 

 

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Who could'a guessed it? 

 

(I think this board did Halper work before almost any other place was talking about him btw)

 

 

Sometimes it's hard to tell. I'll see "breaking news" and think to myself that we've been discussing that here for some time.

[Deranged Rhino]

6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Sometimes it's hard to tell. I'll see "breaking news" and think to myself that we've been discussing that here for some time.

 

 We've been ahead of the curve by well over a year by math. 

[Buffalo_Gal]

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Sometimes it's hard to tell. I'll see "breaking news" and think to myself that we've been discussing that here for some time.

Agreed. Some of this stuff has been out in the open for 18 months now, but these "reporters" are finally getting around to reporting it... or are finally allowed to report it.  A lot of it seems to be a recap, sometimes timelines nicely shown, sometimes, graphs of interconnections, but every once in a while, there really is new news. 

For people who have been following closely... all of about 5,000 people in the US (give or take a thousand) ... the scam has been obvious for quite some time. To the low-fos, this really is "new news". 

[Deranged Rhino]

27 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I saw that clip too. My take was that Barr is determined to get to the bottom of things.

 

Here's the clip: 

 

(posting for the clip)

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Agreed. Some of this stuff has been out in the open for 18 months now, but these "reporters" are finally getting around to reporting it... or are finally allowed to report it.  A lot of it seems to be a recap, sometimes timelines nicely shown, sometimes, graphs of interconnections, but every once in a while, there really is new news. 

For people who have been following closely... all of about 5,000 people in the US (give or take a thousand) ... the scam has been obvious for quite some time. To the low-fos, this really is "new news". 

 

Yup. It's the result of two things:

1) Due process (proper Due process) is slow by design. 

&

2) They had to strike all at once to make any of this stick/not smell of political persecution - not just the Russia investigation, but the spin off leak investigations as well. 

 

Lots of dominoes to align before you can trigger the reaction... but there's been a hell of an effort to get critical pieces of the puzzle out early to the people that's helped the cause as well. Because when this really does hit, it's still going to end up scaring/shocking some of the more asleep folk out there -- and it'll be up to those small pockets of folk who have been paying attention to help soothe/educate them as they come to terms with it all.