Jump to content

Impeachment Hearings Open In House Of Representatives


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Because she is trying to outrun a jail cell herself?

If she wasn't prosecuted over this why would she ever be prosecuted for anything?

 

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/nancy-pelosi-starkist-tuna/

 

No more StarKist Tuna for me …..

SNOPES” VALIDATES THE FACTS BELOW :

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s home district includes San Francisco .

 

Report this ad

 

StarKist Tuna’s headquarters are in San Francisco , Pelosi’s home district.

StarKist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.

StarKist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force.

Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, owns $17 million dollars of StarKist stock.

In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25,

Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase

So Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage.

This would make Del Monte products less expensive than that of its competitors.

Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,

Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill

adding $33 million dollars for an “economic development credit in American Samoa ”

Pelosi has called the Bush Administration “CORRUPT” and many other things !!!

How do you spell “HYPOCRISY” ?

SHE’S SHAMELESS….

EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD GET THIS E-MAIL.

PASS IT AROUND …!!!

I’ll buy the other brands now. I’m not putting another dollar in Pelosi’s bank account.

 
 
Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...But... But Schiff has said for years he has evidence of treasonous collusion between Trump and Russia. 

 

 

 

Why the focus on this (non story) if he has such damning evidence to share with the world (which he did not share with Mueller, his own committee, or the Senate's so far)?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

...But... But Schiff has said for years he has evidence of treasonous collusion between Trump and Russia. 

 

 

 

Why the focus on this (non story) if he has such damning evidence to share with the world (which he did not share with Mueller, his own committee, or the Senate's so far)?

 

The goalposts keep moving.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's so transparent now even those who bought fully into the Trump/Russia hoax should be able to see it by now. 

 

Probably not. TDS is a powerful force.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 12:03 PM, B-Man said:

Lol, it's more like Trump has done so many things that are impeachable that they can't decide which is the worst. Heck, we have argued over a few of them. 

32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's so transparent now even those who bought fully into the Trump/Russia hoax should be able to see it by now. 

When you say Russia Hoax, what do you mean? 

 

That's kind of outrageous to say it's a hoax. Hard to believe how you guys just completely ignore facts that are well known and documented

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

Lol, it's more like Trump has done so many things that are impeachable that they can't decide which is the worst. Heck, we have argued over a few of them. 

 

 

 

LOL...............someone didn't read the article again.

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Isn't that caused by Josh Allen's arm strength?

 

?

 

Post reported. Stop bringing that football crap on to this board. 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2019 at 6:35 AM, B-Man said:
lu·na·tic
/ˈlo͞onəˌtik/
noun
  1. 1.
    a mentally ill person (not in technical use).
    synonyms: maniac, madman, madwoman, psychopath, psychotic; More

 

Image result for Democratic Party    ...........Pelosi tells Dems she wants to see Trump ‘in prison’

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/05/pelosi-impeachment-1355435

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2019 at 9:04 AM, Tiberius said:

Have we ever had an election marked by hacked information that was weaponized and used against a candidate by a foreign power before? Mr Secret Trump went against a candidate who had all her information--private information--hacked and weaponized against her.

 

That was an attack on our system like no other. And almost certainly changed votes or suppressed some. 

 

The Russuans also at the very least tried hacking voting systems, voting machine companies and election officials. 

 

That deserved investigation free of obstruction, do you agree? 

The answer to your question is hidden in plain sight. They are everywhere.  

IMG_0313.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Democrats Give John Dean Another ‘Big Thrill.’

Dean’s misconduct hardly began with Watergate. In 1966 he was fired from the Washington law firm of Welch & Morgan for “unethical conduct” that was “grounds for disbarment,” columnist Jack Anderson reported in April 1973. Dean had apparently tried to make a private deal for a TV broadcast license when he was supposed to be negotiating it on behalf of one of the firm’s clients.

 

During the Reagan Administration, seeking a new thrill, Dean — by now apparently beholden for life to the liberal Democrats who bestowed both 15 minutes of fame and a Get Out Of Jail Free card — declared in Newsweek that “The Iran-Contra inquiries involve matters of national security,” while “Watergate, on the other hand, involved the political security of Richard Nixon. These are Major-league matters versus Little League.”

 

In 2004, his big thrill was claiming that the crimes of President George W. Bush — chiefly liberating Iraq — were worse than Nixon’s, warranting Bush’s impeachment.

 

 

Read the whole thing.

 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Democrats to begin fake impeachment hearings

 

Everybody knows that impeachment is not popular with the voters and a majority want to move on from the RUSSIAN collusion political soap opera. But what do you do when your political base is a bunch of blood-thirsty, camera-*****, anti-Trump hotheads? You hold fake impeachment hearings: all of the spectacle with none of the political damage. We'll see how that works out, but today, Nadler will begin the fake impeachment hearings in the Judiciary Committee with Nixon-era sleazebag John Dean front and center.

For what reason John Dean? Who knows. 

 

 

 

Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Chairman Jerry Nadler about his plans for fake impeachment.

 

In light of Monday’s hearing entitled, “Lessons from the Mueller Report: Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes,” I am compelled to remind you— and request you remind the Majority Members of the Committee — the Rules of the House prohibit Members from “engag[ing] in personalities” with Members of Congress, Senators, or the President. This appears to be part of a strategy to turn the Committee’s oversight hearings into a mock-impeachment inquiry rather than a legitimate exercise in congressional oversight. Conducting such hearings inevitably sets this Committee on a collision course with the longstanding Rules of the House, which you have apparently alluded to as recently as this week.

 

 

Here are some of the points Collins reminds Nadler of:

 

  • Personal abuse, innuendo, or ridicule of the President is not permitted.
  • It is not in order to call the President a ‘‘liar’’ or accuse such person of ‘‘lying’’.
  • It is not in order to cast aspersions on the ethical behavior of the President.
  • Accusations that the President has committed a crime, or even that the President has done something illegal, are unparliamentary.
  • Language impugning the patriotism or loyalty of the President is not in order
  • Personally disparaging the manner in which the President carries out the duties of the office can constitute a personality, such as when the remarks suggest that the President is an undemocratic leader akin to a dictator.
  • A Member may not read in debate extraneous material personally abusive of the President that would be improper if spoken in the Member’s own words, such as material labeling the President’s statement a lie.

 

Collins provides examples for each one of these things that have been ruled out of order in the past because they do not follow House rules.

 

More at the link:  https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-morning-briefing-house-democrats-start-fake-impeachment-hearings/

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 House Democrats’ Hearing Recycles Anti-Trump Felon. 

 

“Remember, the point of these hearings is to put on a show, have selected segments air on television and disseminated on the internet, hope the public turns to support impeachment and then go forward with impeachment.

 

Sadly for Fat Jerry, the NYC helicopter crash directed media coverage away from the Judiciary’s freak show so he didn’t get the intended media coverage.”

 

 

 

 

Showbiz is like that sometimes.

 

 

 

 

Republicans shred Dean’s record: 'How many presidents have you accused of being Richard Nixon?'

by Susan Ferrechio

 

Original Article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

In the wake of the John Dean Circus,

 

Democrats announce more Spirit of '72,

 

- they are excited about the launch of the new Chevy Vega.

 

?

I'm going to pop the cork screw off the cap on a bottle of Boones Farm and watch this groovyshit. Fvcking A, man.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Telling the White House counsel to lie on one’s behalf in order to defeat an inquiry into his own wrongdoing is illegal conduct. 

 

I just wonder if Trump can/will be prosecuted for this when he leaves office. That is classic witness tampering and its all in the Mueller report 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2019 at 8:59 AM, B-Man said:

In the wake of the John Dean Circus,

 

Democrats announce more Spirit of '72,

 

- they are excited about the launch of the new Chevy Vega.

 

?

 

On 6/11/2019 at 11:04 AM, 3rdnlng said:

I'm going to pop the cork screw off the cap on a bottle of Boones Farm and watch this groovyshit. Fvcking A, man.

Is it really bad that I've had both? Only difference, my Vega was a '74 but man, that strawberry Boones Farm taste like champagne while sitting in it! ? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Dean was a rat and convicted and served a cushy time in sentence, but barely 1/10th of what he probably shoulda done

 

perfect role model in 2020 for the Dems!!

 

happy days are here again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

 

 

This will rile up the usual idiots

It won't rile anyone up so why don't you just sit back down.... ?

I heard Acosta on the radio on the way home also say he's had many "backroom" (his own term for "off the record") conversations with Sarah and Kellyanne too where he claims they told him #orangemanbad stuff 

Acosta is the biggest bullsh1t artist (liar) in the WH press corps... 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...