RochesterRob Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 9 hours ago, row_33 said: How many wrong and dumb posts can Tibs make in an 8 year Trump admin? roughly 35 a day and 365 days a year and 8 years.... that’s over 102,000 not even counting the wrong and dumb posts the whole 2016 campaign For what Soros is paying him that works out to a penny per post. I'd go looking for work elsewhere but I guess there is something to be said for job satisfaction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 (edited) 9 hours ago, row_33 said: How many wrong and dumb posts can Tibs make in an 8 year Trump admin? roughly 35 a day and 365 days a year and 8 years.... that’s over 102,000 not even counting the wrong and dumb posts the whole 2016 campaign You are low balling him I think, 35 a day? He has to do more than that lol And imagine if Trump wins re-election, he will be going bonkers that post count will sky rocket! Edited February 7, 2019 by Bray Wyatt 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 4 hours ago, Bray Wyatt said: You are low balling him I think, 35 a day? He has to do more than that lol And imagine if Trump wins re-election, he will be going bonkers that post count will sky rocket! i try to take the kind and high road on arguments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 On 2/5/2019 at 4:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said: https://thehill.com/regulation/administration/428582-ginsburg-not-expected-at-trumps-state-of-the-union?amp&__twitter_impression=true Who's shocked? Totally unsubstantiated gossip - but more than one person told me the "concert" last night was a memorial service. Does this sync up with what you have heard? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 Edited February 10, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 19 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 No way! Best time line ever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 how long until somebody files a FOIA on the health of RBG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 26 minutes ago, /dev/null said: how long until somebody files a FOIA on the health of RBG? They can file whatever they want, no one is getting her medical information, unless they perfect her clone enough to authorize it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Hard to say, they made a pact not to release medical records for 150 years due to what has to be on Slick Willie’s charts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 46 minutes ago, Koko78 said: They can file whatever they want, no one is getting her medical information, unless they perfect her clone enough to authorize it. jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling Roberts will gladly give the same opinion as a disabled RBG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 3 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 There is no blue checkmark on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? Edited February 10, 2019 by Crayola64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? File a lawsuit charging validation of the claim. Trust me. Whatever ruling comes next, if it is 5-4, will be primed for this debate. I'm betting every ruling to come will be 6-3 or greater. I'm betting every ruling will be this so they can protect themselves. That is until the gig will be up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling The court would lose all legitimacy if RBG was incapacitated and someone was voting in her stead. However, the problems with her being incapacitated are 1.) proving it; and 2.) appealing it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Just now, Koko78 said: The court would lose all legitimacy if RBG was incapacitated and someone was voting in her stead. However, the problems with her being incapacitated are 1.) proving it; and 2.) appealing it. It'd be incivility to arise. However, the current desire of the left having their positions - one is the abolishment of SCOTUS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? RBG is likely a member of at least one states Bar Association File a legal malpractice suit against her, requiring her to appear in court. When she refuses to appear, file an appeal with the Federal Appeals court on the grounds that the SCOTUS ruling is fraudulent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Just now, /dev/null said: RBG is likely a member of at least one states Bar Association File a legal malpractice suit against her, requiring her to appear in court. When she refuses to appear, file an appeal with the Federal Appeals court on the grounds that the SCOTUS ruling is fraudulent Judges have absolute immunity from lawsuits. Ethics complaints can be handled through counsel - if they even get that far. You don't think Justice Kavanaugh appeared before the 10th Circuit, do you? As an aside, judges can't actually commit "malpractice" because they are prohibited from practicing law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 27 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? I don't think it's out of the question to ask that an 85-year-old 27-pound US Supreme Court Justice who just had surgery for lung cancer, and who has not been seen in public since, is alive, alert and coherent. I don't care which side of the aisle she nods off on, If she is able to hear cases and rule on them, she should be able to do so from a live feed, no? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, /dev/null said: how long until somebody files a FOIA on the health of RBG? can't. HIPPA 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling conversely, if i am on the losing side of a 4-5 decision i am contesting the results. Edited February 11, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 The lefties went completely crazy when Melania Trump was out of sight for about a month in May 2018... Fantasizing that the president had done something to her and what not. And yet, not hardly a word from the left about Rbg. Odd indeed. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 On 2/8/2019 at 10:09 PM, Hedge said: Does this sync up with what you have heard? Why would they hold a secret memorial? I can't imagine them doing it for sentimental reasons, so why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Judge for yourself. This is the actual RBG event she supposedly attended. I have not watched much of it yet, and it is painful to watch because the performance is horrible (IMO). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Hedge said: Judge for yourself. This is the actual RBG event she supposedly attended. I have not watched much of it yet, and it is painful to watch because the performance is horrible (IMO). I have no idea if that was a memorial (I doubt it, though)...but what really has me shuddering, is that people really sit through this kind of *****. I can't figure out who would ENJOY this. I get that people would sit through it in tribute out of respect. But someone has to conceive this, and put it together, as some kind of "entertainment". Edited February 12, 2019 by OJ Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 3 hours ago, OJ Tom said: I have no idea if that was a memorial (I doubt it, though)...but what really has me shuddering, is that people really sit through this kind of *****. I can't figure out who would ENJOY this. I get that people would sit through it in tribute out of respect. But someone has to conceive this, and put it together, as some kind of "entertainment". The creator is RBG’s daughter in law, so let’s set our expectations are low. It’s not going to Broadway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 (edited) again, i can't speak to the veracity but it probably should be passed on here. https://twitter.com/IncarnatedET/status/1095728131409731585 it's been scrubbed? https://twitter.com/JasonAMasters1/status/1095733056810278913 Edited February 13, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 gotta wait 3 days to see if the Dems can claim a ressurection 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 26 minutes ago, Foxx said: again, i can't speak to the veracity but it probably should be passed on here. https://twitter.com/IncarnatedET/status/1095728131409731585 it's been scrubbed? https://twitter.com/JasonAMasters1/status/1095733056810278913 1) It hasn't been "scrubbed." I found it. 2) Fake. C'mon...searchquarry.com? Check it yourself, it's ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 39 minutes ago, Foxx said: again, i can't speak to the veracity but it probably should be passed on here. https://twitter.com/IncarnatedET/status/1095728131409731585 it's been scrubbed? https://twitter.com/JasonAMasters1/status/1095733056810278913 HQ troll... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 (edited) 26 minutes ago, DC Tom said: 1) It hasn't been "scrubbed." I found it. 2) Fake. C'mon...searchquarry.com? Check it yourself, it's ridiculous. i don't 'see' it? Edited February 14, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Foxx said: i don't 'see' it? PEBCAK 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 58 minutes ago, DC Tom said: PEBCAK PICNIC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just now, /dev/null said: PICNIC PACMAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 Ginsburg back at Supreme Court The Hill, by Lydia Wheeler Original Article Good. I wish her continued improvement. She needs to be in public, her fellow justices should be able to speak with her and assess how she is really doing, and not just through her handlers. Just like in any important position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Ginsburg back at Supreme Court The Hill, by Lydia Wheeler Original Article Good. I wish her continued improvement. She needs to be in public, her fellow justices should be able to speak with her and assess how she is really doing, and not just through her handlers. Just like in any important position. pics or it didn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 my cat could show up to the court and sit in a chair as well, for a few minutes as it realizes how boring it all is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 You didn't give me enough of the tuna water from those tins of solid tuna through the years, sentenced to 10-15 hard labor!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 ........................... The photograph of RBG that the New York Times used in their report yesterday about RBG returning to the Supreme Court was actually taken last November. We've still seen no current photo. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts