Jump to content

Here we go again - The Start Peterman faction is emboldened


Recommended Posts

This is just how pathetic this organization has become when some people are actually defending start peterman again....never seen or heard anything more out of this world than this??  Dear God what this organization has become.......Im not one for "fire everyone" however at the current state of our offense McD needs to be kicked to the curb now.....why waste year 3 on this crap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kevin1778 said:

 

He gets paid nothing. As a 3QB his job isn't to get in games but to prepare the team. He should have been a 3rd QB last year, not a backup. 

He shouldn’t have been on the roster. You could sign a guy tomorrow (Landry Jones for example) that can walk in the door and be better. Peterman doesn’t belong on a roster. He isn’t one of the top 100 QBs in then world (and there are only like 75 rostered QBs). He’s a total scrub that and an embarrassment to all of us. He makes us a bigger joke than we already are. Just cut him and let him start on his next career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

No, he isn’t a “great 3rd QB.” He’s an insurance salesman. He has thrown 9 INTs in 79 passes. He is a complete failure as a QB. You could throw a rock and get better QB play. He is literally the worst QB of all-time. The fact that some people still defend the guy is mind-blowing!!

 

?

 

I have to admit I want the Peterman to start on Monday. If i am going to be there and be cold, i need some entertainment. The Peterman playing has two outcomes

 

1) he wins and it is the greatest comeback/redemption story in the history of sports and he goes on to have a productive career in the NFL!!!!

 

2) he continues his trainwreck of a career, and who does not like to stop and look at trainwrecks?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

He shouldn’t have been on the roster. You could sign a guy tomorrow (Landry Jones for example) that can walk in the door and be better. Peterman doesn’t belong on a roster. He isn’t one of the top 100 QBs in then world (and there are only like 75 rostered QBs). He’s a total scrub that and an embarrassment to all of us. He makes us a bigger joke than we already are. Just cut him and let him start on his next career. 

 

Call me crazy, but I'm starting to think that you don't care for Nate Peterman.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

No, he isn’t a “great 3rd QB.” He’s an insurance salesman. He has thrown 9 10 INTs in 79 82 passes. He is a complete failure as a QB. You could throw a rock and get better QB play. He is literally the worst QB of all-time. The fact that some people still defend the guy is mind-blowing!!

I can understand you forgetting his playoff appearance. It was something most fans should have blocked out for their own sanity.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:

 

Way better than Peterman? Peterman threw a TD and had a much higher rating.

It’s a mirage. His noodle arm leads him to throw pick sixes on demand. Anderson pretty much sucks, but Peterman is a whole new level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mead107 said:

And or Brady ?

Yeah that would be a bonus, but I'd rather watch Brady lose to us, that would be more fun.

 

But I want Gronkowski taken out. That cheap shot on Tre'Davious White should never be forgotten.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, row_33 said:

what difference does it make who starts Monday?

 

 

LMAO! This .

I think Christ could be our qb and we'd lose by 17.

23 minutes ago, fridge said:

 

Yeah! Derek Anderson came in off the street and totally outplayed him. ?

 

Kirby, it turns out we're just terrible. Peterman a little more maybe than the others, but this is basically the darkest hour for our offense. It truly does not matter. We're dangerously close to, "hey, at least we have a team" territory.

Not close ....There. I have been a fan for 28 years. I can't remember a more putrid offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

Call me crazy, but I'm starting to think that you don't care for Nate Peterman.

I mean it is hard enough to be a Bills fan. We don’t need to give everyone else more ammo. There isn’t another team in the league that would employ him and we continue to play him!! Some fans are like, “I don’t know, I need to see more.” We are the only ones stupid enough to advocate for that scrub. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the right decision was to start Peterman even this past week against the Colts. It will give Beane/McDermott no excuses to keep him on the roster next year if he flames out. There is no benefit to starting Anderson as we are probably going to lose regardless. Hopefully Allen heals up quick and the Peterman experiment ends if he can't turn things around.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

Listening to WGR and many calling for Peterman.....  The Poll actually shows how ridiculous it is.  Early on the Poll was 24-1 for Anderson.....  Petermaniacs have since skewed the results.  

 

The fact it is now 31% is scary.

 

This should not be a debate.

Ridiculous is the situation we are in.    But feel free to call people out.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

It’s a mirage. His noodle arm leads him to throw pick sixes on demand. Anderson pretty much sucks, but Peterman is a whole new level. 

 

Yeah but why give this FO and McDermott any reason to keep Peterman on this roster beyond this season? If he flames out cut him once Allen is healthy. Anderson won't be here next year so I see no reason why Peterman shouldn't be playing. A L is still a loss at the end of the day and I rather lose with Peterman vs Anderson at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me a glutton for punishment, but since we are going to lose anyway, it's kind of fun to watch the worst quarterback in NFL history do his thing.  It's not like watching your regular boring bad quarterback do his thing.  The mere fact that every single snap brings the distinct possibility of a pick six adds some excitement.   

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

He did (as bad as that sounds). He was much better than Peterman. 

 

I agree though that that it doesn’t matter. This MAY be the worst offense ever when you factor in the rules. This league is set up for teams to score 30+ points. We have 2 TDs in 18 quarters. We have 3 games without a TD. It is just an abomination. 

Why, because KB actually caught 4 of 5 passes instead of 2 of 6 to 9?  

 

It was ugly and it will remain ugly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...