leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Abortion isn't ever going to be the main issue in elections. It may have some people making a lot of noise about it but many of us conservatives have no problem with the libs killing off their own. I disagree on this issue, and strongly. I think many, many women who would describe themselves as conservative would be be very concerned about this R. V Wade issue. I include in that group women who would never consider having an abortion themselves, but who would likely see this as going backwards as it relates to women's rights. I have no hard data to back this up, just a hunch based on conversations and feedback with many women. I do not believe there is any serious threat to the abortion issue nationally, cannot see any party looking to pick a fight with women in general, and firmly believe this I'd a fight that will be a loser. Edited June 29, 2018 by leh-nerd skin-erd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 I suspect Don will nominate a soft punching bag for the D's to kick around and feel good about defeating before seriously nominating anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 29, 2018 Author Share Posted June 29, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Please be Judge Judy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 28 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Please be Judge Judy. Judge Wapner has a better chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 He should nominate Hillary. Wait, wasn't she disbarred or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 The issues of the judge ruling about self pardons, if the president can duck a subpoena and other issues associated with the investigation into possible criminal conduct by this president will also be important. Will she (it will be a she, I believe) recuse herself from ruling on such matters? If this court lets Trump skate by not having to testify, pardoning all his buddies and himself with 5-4 votes in the courts, then we are not a nation of laws anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 1 hour ago, westside said: He should nominate Hillary. Wait, wasn't she disbarred or something? He should nominate her just so the Senate can refuse to confirm her. Then she'll have been denied two of the three branches of government. 2 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The issues of the judge ruling about self pardons, if the president can duck a subpoena and other issues associated with the investigation into possible criminal conduct by this president will also be important. Will she (it will be a she, I believe) recuse herself from ruling on such matters? If this court lets Trump skate by not having to testify, pardoning all his buddies and himself with 5-4 votes in the courts, then we are not a nation of laws anymore. Coming from a liberal, this is just ??? Edited June 29, 2018 by Golden Goat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 29, 2018 Author Share Posted June 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Golden Goat said: Coming from a liberal, this is just ??? It's an amazing talking point. Harris, their only possible nominee in 2020, went on CNN and said Kennedy's retirement means the Constitution is about to be shredded... because Trump is going to appoint a constitutionalist to the court. The establishment DNC has no argument left but hyperbolic idiocy. Their platform right now is raising taxes, open borders or amnesty, and "working class" socialism. November will be a disaster for them. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 (edited) 51 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's an amazing talking point. Harris, their only possible nominee in 2020, went on CNN and said Kennedy's retirement means the Constitution is about to be shredded... because Trump is going to appoint a constitutionalist to the court. The establishment DNC has no argument left but hyperbolic idiocy. Their platform right now is raising taxes, open borders or amnesty, and "working class" socialism. November will be a disaster for them. Absolutely -- but the underlined part of his last sentence is what amused me. Edited June 30, 2018 by Golden Goat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 (edited) A SUPREME COURT NOMINEE BY JULY 10? The decision: Trump says he’ll announce SCOTUS pick on July 9, down to five candidates . THE TWO MINUTE HATE -- 2018 Edited June 30, 2018 by B-Man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 Amazing how Progressives, people that prided themselves on moving Forward!, are so freaked out about the retirement of an old white guy who has been there for over 30 years 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 29 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Amazing how Progressives, people that prided themselves on moving Forward!, are so freaked out about the retirement of an old white guy who has been there for over 30 years They'll all rejoice and sing about diversity and glass ceilings if Trump nominates a woman, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 Anyone have a horse in this race? My guess is Amy Barrett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandemonium Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 13 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm surprised the second part of this tweet hasn't been spun into "Trump announces intent to have threesome while discussing potential Supreme Court nominees" yet. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 12 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's an amazing talking point. Harris, their only possible nominee in 2020, went on CNN and said Kennedy's retirement means the Constitution is about to be shredded... because Trump is going to appoint a constitutionalist to the court. The establishment DNC has no argument left but hyperbolic idiocy. Their platform right now is raising taxes, open borders or amnesty, and "working class" socialism. November will be a disaster for them. Amazing how she can weigh in on ANY serious legal issues on behalf of the Communist Party USA/Democrat Party when she could not even pass the California Bar Exam 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 13 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's an amazing talking point. Harris, their only possible nominee in 2020, went on CNN and said Kennedy's retirement means the Constitution is about to be shredded... because Trump is going to appoint a constitutionalist to the court. The establishment DNC has no argument left but hyperbolic idiocy. Their platform right now is raising taxes, open borders or amnesty, and "working class" socialism. November will be a disaster for them. You weren't kidding about the D bench being shallow. Harris a possible, if not likely, nominee? Yikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 1 hour ago, BringBackOrton said: You weren't kidding about the D bench being shallow. Harris a possible, if not likely, nominee? Yikes. We saw far worse from the Dems from 1972 to 1988 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 3 hours ago, BringBackOrton said: You weren't kidding about the D bench being shallow. Harris a possible, if not likely, nominee? Yikes. Harris will make a big run because Planned Parenthood is completely beholden to her for raiding the house of David Dalaiden while she was AG in CA. They stormed the house, confiscated all his undercover videos, and basically shut him down to protect PP. Point being, she will do ANYTHING for money and support, so make no mistake about her chances to run in 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 Collins: Won't support SCOTUS pick hostile to abortion rights Washington (CNN)Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote in the coming Supreme Court confirmation fight, said Sunday she would not support a nominee hostile to the landmark abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade "The President really was soliciting my views on the type of nominee that I was looking for," Collins said. "I emphasized that I wanted a nominee who would respect precedent, a fundamental tenet of our judicial system." https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/01/politics/susan-collins-supreme-court/index.html McCain uncertain to be available to vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 1, 2018 Author Share Posted July 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 54 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: But I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these nutbags. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 20 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: But I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these nutbags. They’re not just nutbags, they’re dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 American exceptionalism is one thing, elite liberal American exceptionalism is getting roasted by the second.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 9 minutes ago, joesixpack said: They’re not just nutbags, they’re dangerous. I'm not afraid of people who genuinely don't believe in anyone owning a firearm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 They better hope it’s done when it 49-51, come 2019 it might be a GOP Senate supermajority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 6 hours ago, ALF said: Collins: Won't support SCOTUS pick hostile to abortion rights Washington (CNN)Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a key vote in the coming Supreme Court confirmation fight, said Sunday she would not support a nominee hostile to the landmark abortion ruling in Roe v. Wade "The President really was soliciting my views on the type of nominee that I was looking for," Collins said. "I emphasized that I wanted a nominee who would respect precedent, a fundamental tenet of our judicial system." https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/01/politics/susan-collins-supreme-court/index.html Bravo! We need more planned parenthood clinics in targeted areas. Margaret Sanger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 Quote Jeffrey ToobinVerified account @JeffreyToobin FollowFollow @JeffreyToobin See the new @USSupremeCourt clearly: Abortion illegal; doctors prosecuted; gay people barred from restaurants, hotels, stores; African-Americans out of elite schools; gun control banned in 50 states; the end of regulatory state. My @NewYorker column. Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? . But hey...I'm the pathetic one for laughing at these asshats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 21 minutes ago, B-Man said: Please remember that this hysterical lunatic is one of CNN’s primary Supreme Court analysts... Also.........is he saying that African Americans cannot be in elite schools except by the help of SCOTUS? . His twitter account has a banner that says "From the bestselling author whose book The Run of His Life inspired the FX drama "The People vs. O.J. Simpson..." Really? Like no one ever thought about a docu-drama about OJ until he wrote a book? Could he be any more of a self-centered little twerp? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 19 minutes ago, DC Tom said: His twitter account has a banner that says "From the bestselling author whose book The Run of His Life inspired the FX drama "The People vs. O.J. Simpson..." Really? Like no one ever thought about a docu-drama about OJ until he wrote a book? Could he be any more of a self-centered little twerp? In all fairness, if you work at CNN, it's a little hard to get attention...what with Jim Acosta yelling at everyone all the time. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 1, 2018 Share Posted July 1, 2018 Nice career you’ve got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it. Democrat Senator: Vote for Trump’s SCOTUS pick and your career is toast (video) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 ARE YOU NOW OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A MEMBER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? Democrats Are Increasingly Comfortable With Religious Tests. As another religion with its headquarters in Italy liked to say, “Tutto all’interno dello stato, niente fuori dallo stato, nulla contro lo stato.” https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/300977/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 The Federalist Society has picked its list for Trump. There needs to be a complete and transparent look at what this society is using to pick these people, what financial dealings the leaders of this society have before the courts, what discussions were had in relation to the pick. The pick also also needs to promise to recuse themselves from any matters relating to Trumps criminal investigation. A criminal cannot be allowed to choose the judges that might have to rule on self-pardons, ignoring subpoenas, pardoning his buddies and other issues of executive privilege. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The Federalist Society has picked its list for Trump. There needs to be a complete and transparent look at what this society is using to pick these people, what financial dealings the leaders of this society have before the courts, what discussions were had in relation to the pick. The pick also also needs to promise to recuse themselves from any matters relating to Trumps criminal investigation. A criminal cannot be allowed to choose the judges that might have to rule on self-pardons, ignoring subpoenas, pardoning his buddies and other issues of executive privilege. not necessary maybe not at all, dead wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: not necessary maybe not at all, dead wrong. You are a drunken POS who can't even ignore me correctly. You have said time and again I was on ignore, now put me on ignore and go drink yourself into another stupor and pass out of the park bench and don't reply to my posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 25 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are a drunken POS who can't even ignore me correctly. You have said time and again I was on ignore, now put me on ignore and go drink yourself into another stupor and pass out of the park bench and don't reply to my posts. you can't honestly be this sad of a human being God bless you anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 It amazes me that the fringe on both sides still gets anxious over Roe v. Wade in 2018. The Supreme Court isn't going to touch that case ever again, regardless of who is on it. They aren't in the business of overturning one of their own decisions. It'd be like rewriting a chapter of the Bible to "reflect modern viewpoints." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts