Rubes Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Lots of strong opinions out there on the top 6 QBs (Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Allen, Jackson, and Rudolph), and I get that. Some people desperately want a certain guy, and cringe at the thought of us drafting others. Some would be ready to throw in the towel if we don't get one of the top 4, and would see this as a complete disaster if we end up with Jackson or Rudolph. Am I the only one who would be excited to have any one of those 6 QBs? Each has intriguing qualities and each has their weaknesses. Sure, a few of them stand out more than the others, but I think the potential ceilings of all of them are quite high. Jackson could be electric to watch (and I'm not in the camp that thinks he would be just another TT), Allen has all the tools, and Rudolph excels in many areas and could end up being an outstanding QB. That's a lot of 'potential', but that's everyone in the draft, right? I just feel like any of those 6 could be a franchise QB, and all of them have features that would make them exciting to watch. Not trying to be a homer, I just don't think any of them strike me the same way that JP or EJ did when they were drafted. 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Agreed. A big part of being a Bills fan is "hope" and fans will be energized this fall no matter who the pick is. Usually, that's when reality kicks in and we get back to normal. But, there's always hope... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 All except one. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epstein's Mother Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 11 minutes ago, Rubes said: Lots of strong opinions out there on the top 6 QBs (Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Allen, Jackson, and Rudolph), and I get that. Some people desperately want a certain guy, and cringe at the thought of us drafting others. Some would be ready to throw in the towel if we don't get one of the top 4, and would see this as a complete disaster if we end up with Jackson or Rudolph. Am I the only one who would be excited to have any one of those 6 QBs? Each has intriguing qualities and each has their weaknesses. Sure, a few of them stand out more than the others, but I think the potential ceilings of all of them are quite high. Jackson could be electric to watch (and I'm not in the camp that thinks he would be just another TT), Allen has all the tools, and Rudolph excels in many areas and could end up being an outstanding QB. That's a lot of 'potential', but that's everyone in the draft, right? I just feel like any of those 6 could be a franchise QB, and all of them have features that would make them exciting to watch. Not trying to be a homer, I just don't think any of them strike me the same way that JP or EJ did when they were drafted. I'm with you. Whichever one the Bills end up with I trust that Beane has made the right decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 you seem easy to please. were you like that when picking who to date/marry? "i'll take any girl that likes me!" 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zevo Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I agree with this...just get a guy to develop....there is not one better than the other at this point....my personal favorite big swing would be Jackson... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 It's not six. It is four. And I would only take three of them. Darnold, Rosen, Allen. Jackson makes some sense with a huge upside. Rudolph is a wasted pick as he is a marginal talent who might be a serviceable back up. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I almost started my post with , "yes you're the only one!" Obviously I am wrong and others are fine with any QB. This is the freaking draft it is about picking your guy from all the other ones. As for the blind trust that we make the right choice. Been there , done that. Show me is my new motto. Until we get QB right I'll be skeptical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Agree - there doesn't seem to be one that has significantly greater odds of being a success that another.....don't give away the farm - but get one... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fridge Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I am close to this, except the ones I'm the most afraid of are Darnold and Allen. I don't mind the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 18 minutes ago, Rubes said: Lots of strong opinions out there on the top 6 QBs (Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Allen, Jackson, and Rudolph), and I get that. Some people desperately want a certain guy, and cringe at the thought of us drafting others. Some would be ready to throw in the towel if we don't get one of the top 4, and would see this as a complete disaster if we end up with Jackson or Rudolph. Am I the only one who would be excited to have any one of those 6 QBs? Each has intriguing qualities and each has their weaknesses. Sure, a few of them stand out more than the others, but I think the potential ceilings of all of them are quite high. Jackson could be electric to watch (and I'm not in the camp that thinks he would be just another TT), Allen has all the tools, and Rudolph excels in many areas and could end up being an outstanding QB. That's a lot of 'potential', but that's everyone in the draft, right? I just feel like any of those 6 could be a franchise QB, and all of them have features that would make them exciting to watch. Not trying to be a homer, I just don't think any of them strike me the same way that JP or EJ did when they were drafted. I tend to favor Rosen, but I have a similar opinion. I don't see much difference between those 6 guys, all have positives and negatives. I will be shocked if we don't draft any of them, but would be comfortable taking any of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: It's not six. It is four. And I would only take three of them. Darnold, Rosen, Allen. Jackson makes some sense with a huge upside. Rudolph is a wasted pick as he is a marginal talent who might be a serviceable back up. I actually feel the opposite. I think Jackson is a waste of a pick and Rudolph has some upside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 21 minutes ago, Rubes said: Lots of strong opinions out there on the top 6 QBs (Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield, Allen, Jackson, and Rudolph), and I get that. Some people desperately want a certain guy, and cringe at the thought of us drafting others. Some would be ready to throw in the towel if we don't get one of the top 4, and would see this as a complete disaster if we end up with Jackson or Rudolph. Am I the only one who would be excited to have any one of those 6 QBs? Each has intriguing qualities and each has their weaknesses. Sure, a few of them stand out more than the others, but I think the potential ceilings of all of them are quite high. Jackson could be electric to watch (and I'm not in the camp that thinks he would be just another TT), Allen has all the tools, and Rudolph excels in many areas and could end up being an outstanding QB. That's a lot of 'potential', but that's everyone in the draft, right? I just feel like any of those 6 could be a franchise QB, and all of them have features that would make them exciting to watch. Not trying to be a homer, I just don't think any of them strike me the same way that JP or EJ did when they were drafted. If that’s the case then why not just stay put at 12 and take one ? Or maybe even trade down few spots and get an extra 2nd round pick ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Just now, Canadian Bills Fan said: I actually feel the opposite. I think Jackson is a waste of a pick and Rudolph has some upside You are definitely entitled to that opinion, but I really can't understand how anyone could actually think this way. They are both so-so passers, Rudolph probably a bit better. They have terrible footwork. Jackson is a ridiculous athlete with great size. Rudolph has great size, but has small hands and limited arm strength. Both need lots of work, but the upside of Jackson, if you can develop him is exponentially higher than Rudolph. Rudolph's floor is something like Bryce Petty and his ceiling is probably something like Drew Stanton. Jackson's floor is "switch to another position," and his upside is a better Mike Vick. That is what I see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thandGoal Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 i would be okay with any one of them but the only one I would grab in the top 5 is Darnold and then picks 6-12 would be Allen, Rosen and Mayfield and I would wait to 22 to grab Jackson or Rudolph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Jackson would be fine with the Anthony Lynn playbook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnbillsbacker Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I'm only interested in two of the top 6 in round 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 I wish the Bills knew. Seriously, you think back to the old days when John Butler knew what teams were going to do and I just wish the Bills could know how things were going to fall. I am also OK with the top 6. I would love it if the bills were OK with it and KNEW they could get a guy (and great if it is "their" guy) at 12, because getting our QB and keeping our orgasmucopia of picks would make this an all time great draft. ...but yes, as long as we get one of them I would be OK with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 like Beane said... they all have flaws, it’s just a matter of where your threshold is as far as what flaws (and how deep those flaws are) you’re willing to accept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: You are definitely entitled to that opinion, but I really can't understand how anyone could actually think this way. They are both so-so passers, Rudolph probably a bit better. They have terrible footwork. Jackson is a ridiculous athlete with great size. Rudolph has great size, but has small hands and limited arm strength. Both need lots of work, but the upside of Jackson, if you can develop him is exponentially higher than Rudolph. Rudolph's floor is something like Bryce Petty and his ceiling is probably something like Drew Stanton. Jackson's floor is "switch to another position," and his upside is a better Mike Vick. That is what I see. I understand your opinion but Jacksons pro day wasn't that great. He missed a lot of throws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts