Jump to content
njbuff

Does Shaq Lawson for Martavius Bryant make sense?

Recommended Posts

Does it make sense for the Steelers?

 

Does it make sense for the Bills?

 

What do you guys think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Bryant is not a process guy, I don't like him

Edited by kdiggz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kdiggz said:

Bryant is not a process guy

They tried to trade for him last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kdiggz said:

Bryant is not a process guy

 

They reportedly tried to trade for him last season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, No Place To Hyde said:

Makes sense for Buffalo. Pittsburgh may laugh and hang up the phone.

 

Really? I think they might accept that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

They tried to trade for him last year.

yes that's why I edited to say I don't personally like him.  i think last year they were in a playoff push and were desperate for WR help.  long term i don't like him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was talk about a 4th for Bryant. Can Shaq Lawson get a 4th (same return as Ragland)? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually it may, although Lawson has said he feels better playing with his hand on the ground.  Is he heavy enough to play line in a 3-4?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like it at all.  It opens a huge hole at DE and creates a situation where we have two UFA WR's next year.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jamie Muellers Ghost said:

This is not fantasy football my friend.

 

That's why I asked the question? I never said that either team WILL do it. All I said is it possible? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, FeelingOnYouboty said:

 

Really? I think they might accept that.

An edge setter coming off injury for a guy that is a bonafide playmaker? 

 

If you were Pittsburgh would you take that deal? Be a daisy if ya do...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Shaq is a great fit for Pittsburgh, otherwise I'd say yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

They tried to trade for him last year.

I would love to have Bryant on this roster. He's about the best option to fill that role.I doubt Lawson would be involved.  It may be something the Bills try to revisit with PIT. 

Edited by Boatdrinks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, N.Y. Orangeman said:

I don't like it at all.  It opens a huge hole at DE and creates a situation where we have two UFA WR's next year.  

 

Not for Bryant. But i'd make this trade all day for a good player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lawson has been a disappointment, but come on. Give him a third year in the system. Players do get better, and while he's never going to be that explosive, he has some skills/assets that are valuable. Also, he came out as a junior, so he's still young (23). And he's missed time in both seasons with small-ish injuries. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

There was talk about a 4th for Bryant. Can Shaq Lawson get a 4th (same return as Ragland)? 

 

 

#96 for Bryant wouldn't be bad value to spend at all and better than anyone offering a #4.    WR market is HOT.   After seeing what Eagles and Rams did now everyone wants WR to put around their young QB.    Maybe Steelers throw in a 2019 6th.    They are bereft of draft picks this year.

 

I think Beane is trying to talk Tampa into taking Shaq to move up to #7 though.    THAT would be a helluva deal if he can pull it off.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, N.Y. Orangeman said:

I don't like it at all.  It opens a huge hole at DE and creates a situation where we have two UFA WR's next year.  

 

Not Huge hole... Lawson was just good. Sets edge well, didn’t reall terrorize the backfield 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it would be enough for PIT to trade him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

Not Huge hole... Lawson was just good. Sets edge well, didn’t reall terrorize the backfield 

I am in the minority, but I expect him to take a jump next year.  Regardless, the depth behind him, the FA market and our need for flexibility in the draft make this incredibly risky IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Does it make sense for the Steelers?

 

Does it make sense for the Bills?

 

What do you guys think?

 

Is a frog's a$$ watertight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×