BuffaloBillyG Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8374 And before you ask..NO he is not worth being brought in, mentioned as a bridge, gap or in any way or for associated with the Buffalo Bills QB position. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 No, no, no, no..... NO. I'd rather re-sign EJ. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted February 14, 2018 Author Share Posted February 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: No, no, no, no..... NO. I'd rather re-sign EJ. Only way I sign Glennon is if the NFL awards points for winning a Geoffrey Giraffe look alike contest. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 21 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: No, no, no, no..... NO. I'd rather re-sign EJ. If he can run a pro offense and throw the ball down the field I would have no problem with him as a bridge qb. He would be a dramatic upgrade from what we currently have. Let me remind you that the Bills scored three points in its playoff loss in which the qb play was dreadful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Only if he pays the dead money of Dareus so we can get that back on the cap would i sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JohnC said: If he can run a pro offense and throw the ball down the field I would have no problem with him as a bridge qb. He would be a dramatic upgrade from what we currently have. Let me remind you that the Bills scored three points in its playoff loss in which the qb play was dreadful. Glennon a dramatic upgrade? No, Nope, Nein, and Nyet. Edited February 14, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted February 14, 2018 Author Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 minute ago, JohnC said: If he can run a pro offense(he can't) and throw the ball down the field(not well) I would have no problem with him as a bridge qb. He would be a dramatic upgrade from what we currently have(No, he really wouldn't be). Let me remind you that the Bills scored three points in its playoff loss in which the qb play was dreadful.(Let me remind you that the Bears paid Glennon 16 million dollars to not be running their offense last year. He is one of a small handful of guys that would be a downgrade on Taylor in every football aspect) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 1 minute ago, MAJBobby said: Only if he pays the dead money of Dareus so we can get that back on the cap would i sign him. Why would he agree to that? Is it even allowed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 (edited) 32 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Why would he agree to that? Is it even allowed? No its not allowed. And never would agree to it. But those would be the conditions i sign him Edited February 15, 2018 by MAJBobby 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: No its not allowed. And never would agree to it. Bit those would be the conditions i sign him So you're suggesting the Bills tell him to cheat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 He’s a terrible football player. Hard Pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted February 14, 2018 Author Share Posted February 14, 2018 Just now, 4merper4mer said: So you're suggesting the Bills tell him to cheat? Yes, I would fully endorse him becoming a Patriot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 He’s so bad that Chicago replaced him before he even took a snap for them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Just now, Seanbillsfan2206 said: He’s so bad that Chicago replaced him before he even took a snap for them It was only a matter of time once they drafted Trubisky. Glennon's butt ugly awful play last season expedited matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 He’s not good. but he lit up Marrone’s Bills team in 2013. Fwiw the Bears signed him last year as a bridge but the contract wasn’t that detrimental for them. They didn’t know if they could get Trubisky at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 29 minutes ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: Tyrod Taylor being the starting qb next year is unacceptable. Whatever option is available needs to be taken. If a bad option is better than what our current situation is I'm for it. If its not Glennon then let it be someone else. I'm no longer receptive to watching a pop warner offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, JohnC said: Tyrod Taylor being the starting qb next year is unacceptable. Whatever option is available needs to be taken. If a bad option is better than what our current situation is I'm for it. If its not Glennon then let it be someone else. I'm no longer receptive to watching a pop warner offense. People actually banging the table for Glennon JUST to get rid of Tyrod OMFG 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billieve420 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, John from Hemet said: People actually banging the table for Glennon JUST to get rid of Tyrod OMFG For some people on this board any QB not named Tyrod would be better regardless of how good or bad they are. No point in arguing it won't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, John from Hemet said: People actually banging the table for Glennon JUST to get rid of Tyrod OMFG I'm not banging the table for any particular qb. However, I'm banging the table for another option at qb. Odds are that the organization is going to move on from Taylor. If you don't believe that then you are going to be disappointed when it happens this offseason. I'm open to any option other than the status quo. It's as simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, JohnC said: I'm not banging the table for any particular qb. However, I'm banging the table for another option at qb. Odds are that the organization is going to move on from Taylor. If you don't believe that then you are going to be disappointed when it happens this offseason. I'm open to any option other than the status quo. It's as simple as that. so........like I said? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, JohnC said: I'm not banging the table for any particular qb. However, I'm banging the table for another option at qb. Odds are that the organization is going to move on from Taylor. If you don't believe that then you are going to be disappointed when it happens this offseason. I'm open to any option other than the status quo. It's as simple as that. Not a prudent approach if the option is to start a worse QB like Mike FN Glennon or some of the other bums I have seen proposed on TSW. No sale! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 not that desperate. maybe arizona will pick him up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Not a prudent approach if the option is to start a worse QB like Mike FN Glennon or some of the other bums I have seen proposed on TSW. No sale! Whaley was ready to move on before he lost his authority. I'm confident that McBeane will move on. What options they will pursue I can't say for sure. But I'm very confident that they will find a viable option. Taylor was recently asked if he had heard anything from the organization about his status. He stated no. Many people are resistant to that obvious reality. I'm not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 19 minutes ago, JohnC said: Tyrod Taylor being the starting qb next year is unacceptable. Whatever option is available needs to be taken. If a bad option is better than what our current situation is I'm for it. If its not Glennon then let it be someone else. I'm no longer receptive to watching a pop warner offense. I fully expect every option to be looked at for improving every position. QB, OL, RB. Whatever. Just understand 2 things. ONE- They are worse options than Taylor. There are better, for sure but change for the sake of change just ruins team chemistry. TWO-Making the statement that Glennon could be a "dramatic upgrade" on anything makes anything else you have to say on the matter completely irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JohnC said: Whaley was ready to move on before he lost his authority. I'm confident that McBeane will move on. What options they will pursue I can't say for sure. But I'm very confident that they will find a viable option. Taylor was recently asked if he had heard anything from the organization about his status. He stated no. Many people are resistant to that obvious reality. I'm not. No doubt about that and that's not a problem for me. If Whaley were in charge, Tyrod would have been gone in 2017 and the Bills would have maybe had Trubisky or Watson. It's pretty obvious that Beane and McDermott want to move on too, but if they bring in a Glennon or McCown type that's a step backwards IMO. I hope they can find a rookie to start like Rosen or Mayfield. Barring that a bridge like Bradford with a developmental 1st round QB would be fine as well. Edited February 15, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 17 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: No doubt about that and that's not a problem for me. If Whaley were in charge, Tyrod would have been gone in 2017 and the Bills would have maybe had Trubisky or Watson. It's pretty obvious that Beane and McDermott want to move on too, but if they bring in a Glennon or McCown type that's a step backwards IMO. I hope they can find a rookie to start like Rosen or Mayfield. Barring that a bridge like Bradford with a developmental 1st round QB would be fine as well. After Whaley was dismissed he was asked in an interview if he had it to do over what would he have done differently? Without hesitation he said he wished he would have been more aggressive in addressing the qb position. As far as bringing in a rookie qb to start that isn't a big issue with me. My priority is to get the high end prospect on the roster and then take it from there. If the qb takes time to get ready, then so be it. If a qb shows that he can play right away or sometime during his rookie season, then so be it. His readiness will be the determining factor. I'm not hung up on the bridge qb issue as others are. My criteria are limited. The qb has to be able to run a pro offense and be able to throw the ball down field. 27 minutes ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: I fully expect every option to be looked at for improving every position. QB, OL, RB. Whatever. Just understand 2 things. ONE- They are worse options than Taylor. There are better, for sure but change for the sake of change just ruins team chemistry. TWO-Making the statement that Glennon could be a "dramatic upgrade" on anything makes anything else you have to say on the matter completely irrelevant. Any qb who can run a pro option offense and throw the ball down the field is an upgrade over what Taylor can do. Not only do I firmly believe that but I also believe the McBeane duo also believe that. There are good reasons why he will not be on our roster when the season starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProcessTheTrust Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Tyrod sucks. Glennon sucks. I'm heading back to the new trainer and video director squabble. #offseason 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Tyrod > Glennon Draft a QB, sign a bridge, cut Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillyG Posted February 15, 2018 Author Share Posted February 15, 2018 27 minutes ago, JohnC said: After Whaley was dismissed he was asked in an interview if he had it to do over what would he have done differently? Without hesitation he said he wished he would have been more aggressive in addressing the qb position. As far as bringing in a rookie qb to start that isn't a big issue with me. My priority is to get the high end prospect on the roster and then take it from there. If the qb takes time to get ready, then so be it. If a qb shows that he can play right away or sometime during his rookie season, then so be it. His readiness will be the determining factor. I'm not hung up on the bridge qb issue as others are. My criteria are limited. The qb has to be able to run a pro offense and be able to throw the ball down field. Any qb who can run a pro option offense and throw the ball down the field is an upgrade over what Taylor can do. Not only do I firmly believe that but I also believe the McBeane duo also believe that. There are good reasons why he will not be on our roster when the season starts. Ok, now Glennon can run a pro option offense? Have you ever actually watched him play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, KelsaysLunchbox said: Ok, now Glennon can run a pro option offense? Have you ever actually watched him play? Obviously not if he's advocating for him as a replacement for Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said: He’s a terrible football player. Hard Pass And I’m willing to bet that if Glennon and Tyrod are both available ( free agents ) we all know who gets picked up first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 hour ago, billieve420 said: For some people on this board any QB not named Tyrod would be better regardless of how good or bad they are. No point in arguing it won't matter. It’s true. Anyone but Tyrod sounds great until a guy like Nate Peterman starts and shatters the interception record in a 16 game season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, billsfan11 said: It’s true. Anyone but Tyrod sounds great until a guy like Nate Peterman starts and shatters the interception record in a 16 game season The odds are substantially higher that Peterman will be on next year's roster and Taylor won't be. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, JohnC said: The odds are substantially higher that Peterman will be on next year's roster and Taylor won't be. And your point is?... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 5 minutes ago, Putin said: And I’m willing to bet that if Glennon and Tyrod are both available ( free agents ) we all know who gets picked up first Tyrod (assuming that the price is right) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, JohnC said: The odds are substantially higher that Peterman will be on next year's roster and Taylor won't be. Bridge QB + 1st/2nd round rookie increases the likelihood that Peterman is waived or on the Practice Squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baskingridgebillsfan Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 ABT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Bridge QB + 1st/2nd round rookie increases the likelihood that Peterman is waived or on the Practice Squad. I stated that Peterman was more likely to be on the roster next season than Taylor would. Do you disagree with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Bridge QB + 1st/2nd round rookie increases the likelihood that Peterman is waived or on the Practice Squad. Ya it will all depend if they decide to carry 3 QBs or not. I think at best Peterman is the 3rd stringer next year Just now, JohnC said: I stated that Peterman was more likely to be on the roster next season than Taylor would. Do you disagree with that? What’s your point though? I still don’t know where you’re going with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, JohnC said: I stated that Peterman was more likely to be on the roster next season than Taylor would. Do you disagree with that? I don't care one way or the other, he's not the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts