Jump to content

With the emergence of QBs like Case Keenum do GMs need to re-evaluate things?


Big Turk

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Keenum got lucky on a miracle play vs New Orleans then got stomped in Philly.

 

He was just OK this season in my opinion.

 

Saints were the best team in the NFC, tough luck on that epic moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think he is the best of that bunch because he is the most accurate of that bunch but he is not suddenly a franchise saviour.  He is a serviceable placeholder. I think we have one of those too. 

Keenum is better than Tyrod and would likely do a lot better than him with Daboll's system...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Keenum got lucky on a miracle play vs New Orleans then got stomped in Philly.

 

He was just OK this season in my opinion.

I think he was better than just OK, but the overall point is well taken: this year was an aberration for Keenum rather than some indicator of untapped potential. He still makes those weird backfooted throws that are begging to be picked off, lucky to be playing in a weak division with a great defense, has two All-Pro caliber wideouts who really, really help out...I wouldn't use this year, in which I thought he was borderline terrific, to define him. It's a highlight but unlikely to be repeated IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

 

Yup.. at the time I figured that missed tackle handed Brady his 6th ring. But after really studying the Eagles I feel a lot better.

 

as with every Super Bowl I hope it is interesting into the 4th quarter...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other end of the spectrum, there are still those QBs who come in day 1 (or close) and do well. I think most GMs/HCs want to pretend it's a league of grooming a guy, but the pressure dictates get a guy, find out if he's got it, and if he doesn't fairly soon, move on. Nothing can change that. It's up to the guys like Keenum to do all they can to work on their flaws and hope they land in the right opportunity before it's too late. I'm sure there have been many guys with enough talent who never got their shot. Oh well. Literally...that's life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any light finally clicked. Keenum just ended up in an ideal circumstance on an incredibly talented team with excellent wide receivers and a spectacular OC who earned himself a HC gig with the work he did with Keenum.

 

He is very likely coming crashing back to earth next year.

 

 

 The thing people might need to reevaluate is how much of an impact a great OC can have on a QB's game. So whoever we have under center next year, I hope Dabol is great. If he's as bad as Dennison, I don't know how much our QB can really do.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

As was pointed out, lets see how he does over a couple of seasons and maybe without a great defense around him.  You could make the same argument for Fitz. (and others)  He looked good for awhile too until teams figured him out.

 

I subscribe to the view that nobody cares about unheralded rookies or scrubs who get a shot after a few years of clipboard

 

if they pan out then a book is written on them

 

the saddest book is "let's make him be a QB"

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is the owners who need to think differently. The way GMs and Coaches get fired every 2 or 3 years, there is no time to take the long view for them.

 

If I am a GM who picks a QB in the second round so he will develop in 3 or 4 years, I am lowering my odds of having a job in two years. I will never be there to see it.

 

Same with the coach. He doesn't want a guy on the roster who might be good in 3 years. He wants that spot for someone who can play now.

 

That is not their fault it is the owners fault.

 

The only one who can and does do that, is Bellichick. 

 

 

I think the owners should be responsible for long term planning when it comes to QB and the O-line. Because otherwise, as we have seen,  it doesn't get done.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dalton said:

Agree but a team will make him right I suspect - hopefully not the Bills.

As long as it’s not an overpay, I don’t mind. As long as a QB is drafted in the first. I’m sure some team will throw a bunch of money his way. 

 

He’d be an upgrade over Taylor. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kdiggz said:

Keenum is just the latest in the "journeyman QB's" to have some success.  they all have a blip on the radar at some point but when put in the position of being "the man" they regress and you realize that their small window of success was just an outlier.  let's face it, if you throw enough passes in this league you are bound to get on a hot streak every now and then.  guys like Keenum, Fitz, McCown, Hoyer...those guys are who they are.  if you think they are all of a sudden good then you are just fooling yourself

Excellent post, right on man

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DCOrange said:

If a guy is going to take 7 years to develop like Keenum, he just isn't worth a draft pick. That's far too long to wait.

In 2011 we drafted;

     Round 1 Marcell Dareus

     Round 2 Aaron Williams

     Round 3 Kelvin Sheppard

     Round 4 Da'Norris Searcy

     Round 4 Chris Hairston

     Round 5 Johnny White

     Round 6 Chris White

     Round 7 Just Rogers

     Round 7 Michael Jasper

 

I would say, having a QB on the roster this year that played as well as Keenum did would be worth any one of those draft picks, considering none of them are even on the team any longer or (aside from Dareus) even making a meaningful contribution to a team in the NFL.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DisplacedBillsFan said:

I would say, having a QB on the roster this year that played as well as Keenum did would be worth any one of those draft picks, considering none of them are even on the team any longer or (aside from Dareus) even making a meaningful contribution to a team in the NFL.

6 years in means we'd have already given him a 2nd contract and he'd be at least 2 years into that one. In his first 3 years in Houston he started 10 games and the Texans went 2-8 in those games. Thinking he'd have lasted beyond his rookie contract is foolish. If a player isn't going to contribute within the duration of their rookie contract then they aren't worth the draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...