Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I'm not trying to be defensive at all and am not denying I posted it, I just don't remember which article you're referencing. If you point me to it, I can better answer your question about my take. :beer:

 

I knew you'd make me search.  It was that ridiculous piece by the former Soviet intelligence/military guy who's now working in a DC think tank.  He was praising Putin's military advances that are now superior to the USA's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

I knew you'd make me search.  It was that ridiculous piece by the former Soviet intelligence/military guy who's now working in a DC think tank.  He was praising Putin's military advances that are now superior to the USA's

:beer: 

No, don't bother, I'll go back through and find it when I get home. I post A LOT (obviously) but normally I remember them... this is more about me worrying that I'm forgetting my own posts :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GG said:

 

I knew you'd make me search.  It was that ridiculous piece by the former Soviet intelligence/military guy who's now working in a DC think tank.  He was praising Putin's military advances that are now superior to the USA's

 

Oh, that stupid ***** article?  I'd completely forgotten about that.  Probably because it was *****.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Interesting that he's been arrested in the past for attacking and intimidating Republican women. They only now 'fire' him. Pretty clear what his job duties are.

 

This guy is a hired thug, a coward, and a loser.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Interesting that he's been arrested in the past for attacking and intimidating Republican women. They only now 'fire' him. Pretty clear what his job duties are.

 

This guy is a hired thug, a coward, and a loser.

Yup. 

 

... We've been told these things never happen, they aren't part of the accepted norm... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

State department employee... (Foreign Services Institute):

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/former-state-department-employee-sentenced-producing-child-pornography

 

The darkness is real, and systemic. Thousands of hours. Thousands.

 

Most horrifying thing about that story is the name "Skydance MacMahon."

 

"Son, now that you're old enough, let me explain how you're life's going to unfold: you are going to be horribly bullied through school, so much so that you'll be unable to form real emotional connections to adults, but only children under the age of 12.  Eventually, this will get you arrested and you will die in jail an old man.  All because we named you 'Skydance.'"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

My takeaway was the incredibly childish worldview that if you close your eyes and wish for happy things the bad guys would go away.  Klion probably doesn't recognize how his article destroys Obama's legacy by affirming 44's indecisiveness and vacillations on critical foreign policy and military actions.  Sure, he had a goof heart and good intentions, but in the end, they failed miserably.

 

Quote

 

What, in short, would it mean to be a leftist in foreign policy?

 

In Rhodes’s memoir, we see occasional glimmers of what a left approach to foreign policy might look like. He describes in great detail the personal relationship that he developed with Alejandro Castro Espín (the son of Raúl and nephew of Fidel) while negotiating to restore relations with Cuba, offering a heartening glimpse of what US foreign policy might look like if it were entirely predicated on good-faith efforts to create a more peaceful, just, and open world. And everywhere Rhodes goes, he makes sure the president meets with people from all walks of life. He also tries to make amends for past US crimes; for instance, inspired by an episode of the late Anthony Bourdain’s Parts Unknown, he convinces Obama to pledge $100 million to cleaning up unexploded ordnance in Laos.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

 

My takeaway was the incredibly childish worldview that if you close your eyes and wish for happy things the bad guys would go away.  Klion probably doesn't recognize how his article destroys Obama's legacy by affirming 44's indecisiveness and vacillations on critical foreign policy and military actions.  Sure, he had a goof heart and good intentions, but in the end, they failed miserably.

 

 

 

 

Same happy horseshit the Clintons pushed, that gave us 9/11.

 

People in the world don't want the US to make amends for past US crimes.  They want to DESTROY us for them.  Of all people, American leftists should understand that, since the entirety of their domestic policy is founded on destroying people for past crimes.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RT source, but important: https://www.rt.com/news/441829-us-aircraft-carrier-arctic/

 

 

 

This is an important development for numerous reasons. The surface layer is the deterrent this serves to Russia aggression in the region (something we were told 45 wouldn't do), the deeper layer (more fringe) has to do with Antarctica itself. But that's for another time... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

RT source, but important: https://www.rt.com/news/441829-us-aircraft-carrier-arctic/

 

 

 

This is an important development for numerous reasons. The surface layer is the deterrent this serves to Russia aggression in the region (something we were told 45 wouldn't do), the deeper layer (more fringe) has to do with Antarctica itself. But that's for another time... 

 

So the military exercise in Scandinavia is meant to deter the Russians in Antarctica?

 

And I've got a feeling I know where you're going with this



Aliens.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boyst62 said:

That shows they are China's deep sea monitors. 

 

Correct. 

 

The idea being they aren't Canadian (or Chinese really) - and were put there to mark US subs coming out of the barn. 

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2169474/canada-installs-chinese-underwater-monitoring-devices-next-us

 

Remember this: 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

So yet proposen that the US blewn up dem robots? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boyst62 said:

So yet proposen that the US blewn up dem robots? 

 

(for those who are still new - I'm having some fun speculating...)

 

I think it's at the very least interesting that three large quakes - which could be something else entirely - happened right in the area where these devices were reportedly installed. It's an active area in terms of quakes, but the size of these are well above the normal range. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

(for those who are still new - I'm having some fun speculating...)

 

I think it's at the very least interesting that three large quakes - which could be something else entirely - happened right in the area where these devices were reportedly installed. It's an active area in terms of quakes, but the size of these are well above the normal range. 

 

 

All "strong quakes" are "well above the normal range."  The relative frequency of quakes by magnitude goes by 10^(-M), where M is the magnitude. 

 

The fault off the Pacific Northwest is a subduction zone that can generate quakes in the 8.5+ range.  6.5's are unexpected, but not unusual given the frequency distribution and nature of the fault line.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

All "strong quakes" are "well above the normal range."  The relative frequency of quakes by magnitude goes by 10^(-M), where M is the magnitude. 

 

The fault off the Pacific Northwest is a subduction zone that can generate quakes in the 8.5+ range.  6.5's are unexpected, but not unusual given the frequency distribution and nature of the fault line.

Insert bored face Jay Cutler meme here.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Insert bored face Jay Cutler meme here.

somehow, "Insert bored face Jay Cutler meme here." doesn't cut the mustard. the least you could do is to actually post the bored face Jay Cutler meme.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

All "strong quakes" are "well above the normal range."  The relative frequency of quakes by magnitude goes by 10^(-M), where M is the magnitude. 

 

The fault off the Pacific Northwest is a subduction zone that can generate quakes in the 8.5+ range.  6.5's are unexpected, but not unusual given the frequency distribution and nature of the fault line.

Ah phooey!!! It was more fun speculating that Trump had an Earthquake Machine to go along with the Cheney Weather Machine

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

All "strong quakes" are "well above the normal range."  The relative frequency of quakes by magnitude goes by 10^(-M), where M is the magnitude. 

 

The fault off the Pacific Northwest is a subduction zone that can generate quakes in the 8.5+ range.  6.5's are unexpected, but not unusual given the frequency distribution and nature of the fault line.

 

:ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...