Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, realtruelove said:

Can someone elaborate on who wants to keep Assange silent and who wants him to testify?

 

Comey, McCabe, and Brennan definitely want Assange to stay silent -- as well as the Clinton machine and everyone involved in the fake dossier. Remember, Comey had a deal to bring Assange to the states WILLINGLY in 2017. Assange offered NOT to release the Vault 7 data taken from CIA in exchange for coming in from the cold and giving the FBI information on who gave Wikileaks the DNC, DCC and Podesta emails. Comey -- working with Senator Warner on the Senate intel commission -- SPIKED this deal... at the cost of releasing the CIA cyber-warfare toolkit into the wild. 

 

That's how scared of what Assange has to say Comey, the establishment DNC, and the Obama White House was. 

 

Assange is the only person in the world who can confirm where he got the "hacked" documents from. And if he can prove that it wasn't a hack, wasn't from a Russian or a Russian proxy -- and was, say, a leak from within the DNC by a deceased staffer -- that would be catastrophic to the entire media/DNC/establishment narrative they've been pushing for four years. 

 

Assange must never be allowed to talk if you're in the Clinton, Obama, or establishment camp. 

 

Trump wants him here, protected and talking. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Imagine spending your time logging onto an unofficial NFL team fan forum, anonymously, to call a woman a cow because you disagree with her political opinions.


He's something else. Take a look at his posting history down here. 

I put him on ignore. He's clearly :wacko:.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


Facebook will not take new political ads a week out, but they are allowing the #fakenews networks to spread whatever stories they put out (wanna bet the anti-Trump ones are amplified?!?) Because everyone knows the major "news" networks are totally fair, balanced, on the up-and-up and have no agenda. :rolleyes:  Facebook is claiming the ads need to be submitted by October 27th to run.  The politicians can front load them.  This is a softening of the original ban considered. All this is of course to "stop the spread of misinformation." Uh huh

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2020 at 9:01 PM, njbuff said:

Why even have an Election Day if these idiots want to delay the results?

 

Get the F out of my face with that bvllshit.

 

Get the votes in on ELECTION DAY and live with whatever the results are.

 

SMH, SMH, SMH

Word is the Dems already have an army of lawyers all set to litigate the crap out of the election...they want to delay Trump winning as long as possible...and even attempt to pick off some electors of states he has won...

 

Federal law states that if a prez has not been selected by January 20, the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi) becomes interim prez, with all the powers that go along with it...

 

Their goal is to delegitimize the results if Trump wins- much like the fake Russia collusion conspiracy...

 

Even though Dr. Fauci and Burks have said it is safe to go to the polls, Dems are pushing mail in voting to take advantage of ballot harvesting...This is also why they are against voter ID laws...lol...any sane person would want their vote protected by having state ID/driver’s license required so no one can claim to be them- just like at the bank when funds are being withdrawn from an account...it’s just common sense.

 

Democrats have truly sold out their country for power...this is why so many lifetime party members are leaving...sad...

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shocker :rolleyes:

Declassified doc
 

National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules

The largely secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court identified 'widespread violations' concerning improper searches for information on American citizens
 

</snip>
 

The pattern was revealed while searching through emails that were gathered without a warrant, according to a December ruling declassified Friday.
 

Additionally, the ruling stated that despite identifying "widespread violations" by analysts conducting these searches, a judge still approved the warrantless surveillance program for another year.
 

Outlined in a heavily redacted, 83-page document, the ruling was part of the regular certification process for the use of surveillance techniques enabled by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
 

Those techniques included the warrantless surveillance program that allows the government to collect emails and phone calls from noncitizens abroad even while they are communicating with Americans.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Word is the Dems already have an army of lawyers all set to litigate the crap out of the election...they want to delay Trump winning as long as possible...and even attempt to pick off some electors of states he has won...

 

Federal law states that if a prez has not been selected by January 20, the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi) becomes interim prez, with all the powers that go along with it...

 

Their goal is to delegitimize the results if Trump wins- much like the fake Russia collusion conspiracy...

 

Even though Dr. Fauci and Burks have said it is safe to go to the polls, Dems are pushing mail in voting to take advantage of ballot harvesting...This is also why they are against voter ID laws...lol

 

Democrats have truly sold out their country for power...this is why so many lifetime party members are leaving...sad...

if election results nation wide are being contested, how can Congress be seated by Jan 20 to elect Pelosi as Speaker.

sounds more like Pompeo takes over as sitting Sec of State

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, spartacus said:

if election results nation wide are being contested, how can Congress be seated by Jan 20 to elect Pelosi as Speaker.

sounds more like Pompeo takes over as sitting Sec of State

You may be right...not sure of the details as this would be unprecedented territory...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some truly evil people working against this country.
 

Meet Norm Eisen: Legal Hatchet Man and Central Operative in the “Color Revolution” Against President Trump
 

In our report on Never Trump State Department official George Kent, Revolver News first drew attention to the ominous similarities between the strategies and tactics the United States government employs in so-called “Color Revolutions” and the coordinated efforts of government bureaucrats, NGOs, and the media to oust President Trump.
 

Our recent follow-up to this initial report focused specifically on a shadowy, George Soros linked group called the  Transition Integrity Project (TIP), which convened “war games” exercises suggesting the likelihood of a  “contested election scenario,” and of ensuing chaos should President Trump refuse to leave office. We further showed how these “contested election” scenarios we are hearing so much about play perfectly into the Color Revolution framework sketched out Revolver News’ first installment in the Color Revolution series.
 

This  third installment of Revolver News‘ series exposing the Color Revolution against Trump will focus on one quiet and indeed mostly overlooked participant in the Transition Integrity Project’s biased election “war games” exercise—a man by the name of Norm Eisen.
 

As the man who implemented the David Brock blueprint for suing the President into paralysis and his allies into bankruptcy, who helped mainstream and amplify the Russia Hoax, who drafted 10 articles of impeachment for the Democrats a full month before President Trump ever called the Ukraine President in 2018, who personally served as DNC co-counsel for litigating the Ukraine impeachment, who created a template for Internet censorship of world leaders and a handbook for mass mobilizing racial justice protesters to overturn democratic election results, there is perhaps no man alive with a more decorated resume for plots against President Trump.
 

Indeed, the story of Norm Eisen – a key architect of nearly every attempt to delegitimize, impeach, censor, sue and remove the democratically elected 45th President of the United States – is a tale that winds through nearly every facet of the color revolution playbook. There is no purer embodiment of Revolver’s thesis that the very same regime change professionals who run Color Revolutions on behalf of the US Government in order to undermine or overthrow alleged “authoritarian” governments overseas, are running the very same playbook to overturn Trump’s 2016 victory and to pre-empt a repeat in 2020. To put it simply, what you see is not just the same Color Revolution playbook run against Trump, but the same people using it against Trump who have employed it in a professional capacity against targets overseas—same people same playbook.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

Today, Attorney General William P. Barr and Drug Enforcement Administration Acting Administrator Timothy J. Shea announced the results of Operation Crystal Shield, a DEA–led effort targeting the command and control elements of Mexican cartels that operate major methamphetamine “transportation hubs” throughout the United States.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Supposedly Reliable Steele Acted 'Crazy,' His FBI Handler Says: 'People's Ears Were Bleeding.'


</snip>
 

“Crazy” was the term the FBI agent used to describe the behavior of Christopher Steele, author of the now-debunked Trump-Russia dossier. “I've seen crazy source-related stuff in 20 years in New York and this was one of the craziest," the veteran agent testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
 

</snip>
 

The previously unreported testimony of FBI agent Michael Gaeta is found on page 900 of the fifth and final volume of the Senate committee’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. It raises new questions about the basis of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, Crossfire Hurricane, and the declarations it made to the FISA court in four separate applications submitted to spy on American citizens.
 

</snip>
 

The willingness of the assistant director for counterintelligence to misrepresent essential information is important because it was Priestap who was responsible for the official launch of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation in the first place.
 

Gaeta explained to senators just how serious and irrevocable a break it was to “close” a source: ''Once he's closed, nobody is allowed – we can't talk to him.”

In this case, that practice was not followed. Priestap’s apparent rationale was that the decision to close Steele as a source was not made because he offered unfounded claims but because he had violated confidentiality agreements by sharing them with the press. And so, the FBI continued to gather new “reporting” by Steele. One of channels was David Corn, the Mother Jones reporter who had written the article about Steele’s accusations. Corn was a longtime friend of then-FBI General Counsel James Baker. Their children had gone to the same school years before and carpooled. Corn gave Steele memos to Baker and then Baker passed them on to Priestap. Thus the strange situation in which an assistant director of the FBI forbade agents from talking to Steele because of the source’s indiscretion with Mother Jones and then proceeded to gather Steele materials through a back-channel relationship with Mother Jones.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2020 at 9:57 AM, Buffalo_Gal said:

Shocker :rolleyes:

Declassified doc
 

National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules

The largely secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court identified 'widespread violations' concerning improper searches for information on American citizens
 

</snip>
 

The pattern was revealed while searching through emails that were gathered without a warrant, according to a December ruling declassified Friday.
 

Additionally, the ruling stated that despite identifying "widespread violations" by analysts conducting these searches, a judge still approved the warrantless surveillance program for another year.
 

Outlined in a heavily redacted, 83-page document, the ruling was part of the regular certification process for the use of surveillance techniques enabled by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
 

Those techniques included the warrantless surveillance program that allows the government to collect emails and phone calls from noncitizens abroad even while they are communicating with Americans.
 

</snip>

 

 

...and to think we thought J Edgar was THE "bad guy".........bet he's pissed the current crop is stealing his thunder.....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

What does this mean in the grand scheme of things?


They want what Fox knew, and when they knew it. 🤷‍♂️  Will Rich's parents will take a payout with a NDA?  Will Assange being extradited change anything? (His hearing is on pause until Monday.)

Hopefully, our resident legal eagles can tell you what it actually means.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If she has the data, share it. This would be proof positive...

 

“The genome sequence is like a human finger print,” she told the talk show. “So based on this you can identify these things. I use the evidence … to tell people why this has come from the lab in China, why they are the only ones who made it.”

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...