Jump to content

Pros and cons of keeping Rex next season


BillsFan130

Recommended Posts

The only pro to keeping Rex is having continuity. So far, his defense is nothing to write home about. We've invested pretty heavily on that side of the ball to accommodate Rex's scheme and it looks like it's going to continue when we have to invest even more in another CB once Gilmore leaves and both safety spots.

 

The offense will continue doing what it has been doing and we'll probably be a .500 team under Rex. Always good enough to never have a top pick but bad enough to never make the playoffs.

 

Realistically though, I don't think Rex gets fired after this year. He'll likely get at least 3 years to really prove he's an average at best HC in this league. When it comes to HCs and QBs, we don't have much luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I know the season isn't over, and of course if the bills make the playoffs Rex will probably stay. And on the other end, if the bills go 4-12 he will be for sure gone, but chances are the bills will go 7-9 roughly. So here are some of my pros and cons if the bills end up finishing with a middle of the pack record

 

Pros

 

1. A Lynn/ Tyrod development- I for one am not a Tyrod lover, but i do think he is an average NFL QB who can get better. Since A Lynn came in, the offence has been much better. He makes the o line better, QB better, and WRS better. If Rex is gone, A Lynn surely wouldn;t be back in Buffalo as the new head coach would want to bring his own guy in. Same as Tyrod, as he is owed 27 mil or something next year? There is no guarantee he would be back as well. Keeping Rex means keeping A Lynn and Tyrod, which looks somewhat promising

 

2. Continuity/improvement- I might get blasted for this one, but even though the bills defence is below average this year, they are better than last year . No A Williams, Ragland, Dareus and Lawson for the most part, and sack totals are way up. The biggest problem is obviously the secondary. Is it Rex's fault that Gilmore and Darby can't cover anyone this year? I would say partially because he does put them on a island a lot, but at the end of the day, those guys need to make way more plays. Rex has shown, if you can give him a good secondary, his defence goes to elite level. In saying that, there still looks to be a lot of confusion out there. That is a huge problem

 

Cons

 

1. No Accountability- Pretty obvious that the bills don't have much accountability on the team. Penalties again are ridiculous again. Guys can make stupid plays then will continue to play the rest of the game. I don't think that will ever change for Rex

 

2. History shows him to be mediocre coach- Since 2011 I believe Rex hasn't had made the playoffs? He is a below .500 coach, and chances are if he's back next year, he will hover around that record again

 

- My personal opinion, I don't think Rex is a great coach at all and has obvious flaws. In saying that, if the bills finish with a 7-9 or 8-8 record, I would bring him back as long as Tyrod and A Lynn keep showing signs of improvement. I truly believe Rex can fix the defence when he has playmakers and when healthy. We all know the most important thing is to have a franchise QB, so if there is even a chance Tyrod is like that under A Lynn, bring all 3 of them back next year and rip up the AFC

 

Rex isn't our problem.

 

1. What do people expect from a team missing most of the top players from this team most of the year? Missing our best DL. Missing our best WR. Missing our best S. Missing our young LBs (Shaq if finally back). Missed our top RB 1 week. Missing several other WR's. And now missing our best OL in Wood, and yes I say the best because he has been the most consistent and his loss was immediately felt against Seattle.

 

2. You can argue we are missing our DB's because I dont even recognize Gilmore and Darby. And by the way, all these people through the year have kept saying they love Ed Reed, he's a great coach, he is going to be a great HC, etc. Well he is the defensive backs coach, and the defensive backs have been literally, without debate, the worst performing unit on the entire roster this year and have MASSIVELY regressed from last year. The ONLY thing different, is the DB coach and that is Ed Reed. So what on Earth makes people think he is doing a good job and its Rex fault more than his? Rex didn't change the D, just the DB coach.

 

3. Roman - I can't help but wonder if we get 2 more wins to start the year, at the very least the Balt game, if Lynn had been the OC day 1. The offense is light years better, and even in a game where our DB's made Fitz look like Brady, we still had a chance to win that game. Yes we put up points in that game, but the offense was mostly bad except for a couple long scoring plays.

 

4. Seattle - Cant deny the Refs stole that game for us. I never complain about losses because of Refs, but we were screwed in that game.

 

IMO Rex has done a good job this year...people want to hate Rex because of the defensive struggles, but he can't make the plays on the field. Guys like Gilmore, Darby, our Safeties are not doing THEIR jobs. And I think what its been in the past more than anything, is that the rest of the defense has masked their short comings, and now teams have seen the weakness and attack them constantly. I compare it to when Tyson lost to Douglas...once that happened, he was exposed and no one was worried anymore. Gilmore has this myth about him that we was an Elite shut down corner and teams never attacked him like they are this year. Once he got exposed, they have aggressively gone after him. Even Carrol said he was going to attack the weakness of the Bills D, our 2 starting corners...and not only did he say it, he did it, and it worked.

Every team gets injures we just get bone crushing injuries to our best players.

 

AWill 3gms

Cordy 3gms

Sammy 7gms

Dareus 8gms

Woods 1gm

McCoy 2gms

Lawson 7gms

Ragland IR

 

I challenge anyone to show me a team that's winning with these types of injuries.

 

This times 1000. The issue on this board, is they dont care about facts. The only fact they care about is 16 years. So logic and reason goes out the window. Teams DO NOT continue to win when they lose that many CRITICAL players to a teams success...they just dont. I dont want to hear this factless, pointless, and irrelevant blanket statement of "all teams have injuries" because not all teams are equal, not all teams lose the same important players, etc.

 

Dallas and Balt were supposed to be SB and playoff contenders last year...they lost a couple of key people and combined to win LESS games than we did even though we lost MORE key people.

 

Look at the loss of Wood last week...the offense immediately felt that impact and it dramatically affected us trying to win the game the Refs screwed us on. Its utterly stupid to disregard our injury situation both last year and this year. We aren't losing backups, we are losing our best starters at key positions...and then in some cases losing their backups too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen enough where I can support sticking with him for Year 3.... barring the bottom falling out and them finishing 1-6 or something

 

Yes, agreed...if we go like 1-6 with uninspired football then I think his time will have come. But I really can't see that happening, especially with Sammy (hopefully) coming back, having Shaw back, Dareus back, McCoy healthy, etc over the next couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Rex isn't our problem.

 

1. What do people expect from a team missing most of the top players from this team most of the year? Missing our best DL. Missing our best WR. Missing our best S. Missing our young LBs (Shaq if finally back). Missed our top RB 1 week. Missing several other WR's. And now missing our best OL in Wood, and yes I say the best because he has been the most consistent and his loss was immediately felt against Seattle.

 

2. You can argue we are missing our DB's because I dont even recognize Gilmore and Darby. And by the way, all these people through the year have kept saying they love Ed Reed, he's a great coach, he is going to be a great HC, etc. Well he is the defensive backs coach, and the defensive backs have been literally, without debate, the worst performing unit on the entire roster this year and have MASSIVELY regressed from last year. The ONLY thing different, is the DB coach and that is Ed Reed. So what on Earth makes people think he is doing a good job and its Rex fault more than his? Rex didn't change the D, just the DB coach.

 

3. Roman - I can't help but wonder if we get 2 more wins to start the year, at the very least the Balt game, if Lynn had been the OC day 1. The offense is light years better, and even in a game where our DB's made Fitz look like Brady, we still had a chance to win that game. Yes we put up points in that game, but the offense was mostly bad except for a couple long scoring plays.

 

4. Seattle - Cant deny the Refs stole that game for us. I never complain about losses because of Refs, but we were screwed in that game.

 

IMO Rex has done a good job this year...people want to hate Rex because of the defensive struggles, but he can't make the plays on the field. Guys like Gilmore, Darby, our Safeties are not doing THEIR jobs. And I think what its been in the past more than anything, is that the rest of the defense has masked their short comings, and now teams have seen the weakness and attack them constantly. I compare it to when Tyson lost to Douglas...once that happened, he was exposed and no one was worried anymore. Gilmore has this myth about him that we was an Elite shut down corner and teams never attacked him like they are this year. Once he got exposed, they have aggressively gone after him. Even Carrol said he was going to attack the weakness of the Bills D, our 2 starting corners...and not only did he say it, he did it, and it worked.

 

Can't say I disagree too much with you sir. Good post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dareus and Williams are losses. Same with Watkins. But outside of Dareus are they unexpected injuries? Did Whaley/Rex do anything for insurance purposes for these injuries? Nope.

 

 

As Ive said many times, I find the scheme asinine if it relies on a fragile, one hit away from retirement safety.

 

Rex needs all stars at every position for his defense to be successful is what you are saying.

 

Are Darby and Gilmore being put in position to make plays? Leaving them on an island with new safety help is a lot to ask of your corners in today's NFL. Get ready for a corner heavy draft to help Rex finally get to the 2014 Shwartz defense when he arrives.

 

First of all, you left off our starting offensive tackles, McCoy, Shaq, Ragland, etc...you think those injuries dont matter to this team? If you say yes, you are not being truthful and just trying to support your theory.

 

You do realize you dont wave a magic wand in the offseason and fill every hole among the starters and also stack the deck with talent behind him them right? Whaley took over a team severely lacking talent all across its roster. He has done a great job of adding a lot of talent to this team. But to expect to upgrade our starters and then stack the depth behind them with quality players to sustain the loss of those starters is completely unrealistic.

 

Going into the off season, LB and pass rush was a big need, and we used the draft to fill it...and it looks like we did a really good job as Shaq looks like the real deal and Rags was having a great camp before the injury. We dont get to add 20 really good players every year, we can't fill every position. Whaley can't build 2 full rosters in case the starting one gets hurt.

 

MOST TEAMS dont have many good players behind their starters, because good players usually go on to start for them or someone else. Again, we have done a LOT BETTER than MOST teams who lose the QUALITY and AMOUNT of starters that we have lost...yet, just like last year, Rex has us holding ground for a potential playoff spot still while weathering the storm while most teams barely win any games.

 

No offense, but you have a very skewed perception of our injury situation and you down play it in almost every thread. You seem to think teams should just magically have #1 WR's sitting there in there 3rd and 4th spots...quality OL sitting there to fill in at a moments notice...good DL and LB's sitting on the bench waiting for someone to get hurt...starting quality safeties sitting on the bench. It just doesnt happen...sure, there are young guys or sleeper guys that emerge every year after injuries, but to expect to have enough to withstand the loss of your best WR's, best RB, best OL, best DT, best S, etc etc is unbelievably unrealistic. But guess what...Whaley has done a great job finding quality guys to fill in off the street, in unhearlded FA signings, mid to low draft picks, after thought veterans, etc. But you can only sustain so many injuries before it becomes unsurmountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team gets injures we just get bone crushing injuries to our best players.

 

AWill 3gms

Cordy 3gms

Sammy 7gms

Dareus 8gms

Woods 1gm

McCoy 2gms

Lawson 7gms

Ragland IR

 

I challenge anyone to show me a team that's winning with these types of injuries.

Like I stated in an earlier post the Patriots only had three players that started in all 16 games last year and still went to the AFC Championship. Injuries happen to every team and if Bills fans will look at the offseason many fans were saying the biggest problem with the team was depth at several positions. It's like Bills fans can't stop making excuses for bad coaching year after year. Jauron's teams were also always injured and he got to 7-9 with Edwards and JP at QB.

 

 

My post was more about what the heck is up with the defense that failed to fully utilize the all pro D-line last year and this year it's making the secondary look inept. These things are easily understandable as last year the defense ran mostly a two-gap defense to stop the run and is the biggest reason for the lack of sacks. Conversely, this year the team is running more of a one-gap scheme that is more of a quick penetrating style like Denver runs and now we see the team leading the league in sacks. Also, the secondary playing poorly at times can be explained as the team is leaving the CB's in man coverage while the safeties cheat up to help stop the run. This leaves the CB's on an island and not many CB's can play man in coverage all game and survive it.

 

Even if you don't care to believe this is it really doesn't matter as the main point is defense isn't playing anywhere near the level it was playing just two short years ago with mostly the very same players. In actuality that 2014 defense had less talent at the CB position. Now go back to 2014 and look at all the injuries and only 7 starters out of 22 played in all 16 games.

 

 

Coaching is the problem and most Bills fans can't see that because the last time this team had a head coach and coaching staff that made the playoffs was in 1999!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I stated in an earlier post the Patriots only had three players that started in all 16 games last year and still went to the AFC Championship. Injuries happen to every team and if Bills fans will look at the offseason many fans were saying the biggest problem with the team was depth at several positions. It's like Bills fans can't stop making excuses for bad coaching year after year. Jauron's teams were also always injured and he got to 7-9 with Edwards and JP at QB.

 

 

My post was more about what the heck is up with the defense that failed to fully utilize the all pro D-line last year and this year it's making the secondary look inept. These things are easily understandable as last year the defense ran mostly a two-gap defense to stop the run and is the biggest reason for the lack of sacks. Conversely, this year the team is running more of a one-gap scheme that is more of a quick penetrating style like Denver runs and now we see the team leading the league in sacks. Also, the secondary playing poorly at times can be explained as the team is leaving the CB's in man coverage while the safeties cheat up to help stop the run. This leaves the CB's on an island and not many CB's can play man in coverage all game and survive it.

 

Even if you don't care to believe this is it really doesn't matter as the main point is defense isn't playing anywhere near the level it was playing just two short years ago with mostly the very same players. In actuality that 2014 defense had less talent at the CB position. Now go back to 2014 and look at all the injuries and only 7 starters out of 22 played in all 16 games.

 

 

Coaching is the problem and most Bills fans can't see that because the last time this team had a head coach and coaching staff that made the playoffs was in 1999!

 

So that means you think if BB was our coach we would have won the SB by your logic. I mean you are basically saying its coaching, then use the Pats as the example as if the only reason they won it was because of better coaching. So do you honestly believe this team with the exact roster, exact injuries, etc would have not only won the SB last year but would also be wining this division this year?

 

And what about Dallas last year? They lost 2 key players and barely won any games. What about Balt last year? They lost a couple of key players (even BEFORE Flacco) and barely won any games last year...both were SB and playoff contenders going in. We WON more games then them COMBINED last year and we had a worse injury situation. So to cherry pick a team with arguably the best coach in history, the best QB in history, and the best TE in history...none of which missed any games last year...is bit of a silly comparison.

 

Which FURTHERS my point...no injury situation is the same and the Pats did NOT lost their very BEST players to injury that make that team win.

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I said the Dareus and now Williams injury have hurt us.

 

Starting Tackles? Glenn missed two games and Sentral was never our starting tackle nor is he any better than Mills.

 

Shaq and Reggie? Two rookies, two unknowns.

 

McCoy missed two games. One that really didn't matter because we got destroyed.

 

Your making excuses and your reaching badly.

 

Lol, how long does it take to build a good team?

 

Your right, you can't wave a wand and fill holes. Look at all the holes Rexs defense is creating for this team.

 

Last year we needed better linebackers and defensive linemen. Now we need safety's and corners.

 

Does anyone remember how many holes the defense had before Rex got here?

 

No offense, but you have a real skewed perception of the job Rex is doing.

 

You dont think losing our top 2 picks was a loss? Shaq is proving his value already in limited reps. Rags was having a great camp. How can you say McCoy not being there didn't matter then follow it up with we got destroyed...whcih is EXACTLY the point, you get destroyed when you dont have your best players, I mean come on.

 

Glenn missed 2 games...so do those 2 games not count in our record? So because its 2 games, those 2 games dont matter?

 

You also left off Watkins, so now I know you are crazy if you think him and the OTHER injuries to WR havent hurt us.

 

The fact you are ONLY willing to acknowledge 2 players, when the others you are ignoring are KEY starters, and some are either our best players or best young players is, for a lack of a better word, absurd. Just because they werent out for the season doesn't mean it didn't impact us in the games they missed, many of which we lost and were mostly winnable despite them being out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So that means you think if BB was our coach we would have won the SB by your logic. I mean you are basically saying its coaching, then use the Pats as the example as if the only reason they won it was because of better coaching. So do you honestly believe this team with the exact roster, exact injuries, etc would have not only won the SB last year but would also be wining this division this year?

 

And what about Dallas last year? They lost 2 key players and barely won any games. What about Balt last year? They lost a couple of key players (even BEFORE Flacco) and barely won any games last year...both were SB and playoff contenders going in. We WON more games then them COMBINED last year and we had a worse injury situation. So to cherry pick a team with arguably the best coach in history, the best QB in history, and the best TE in history...none of which missed any games last year...is bit of a silly comparison.

 

Which FURTHERS my point...no injury situation is the same and the Pats did NOT lost their very BEST players to injury that make that team win.

First off, Dallas lost Tony Romo after four games and they had no adequate backup plan at QB as Matt Cassell went 1-6, Kellen Moore went 0-2, Branden Weeden went 0-3 and only Romo did anything at 3-1. So their problem in its entirety was at quarterback! This year they are starting a rookie at QB after Romo went on IR and because he is winning the team is 7-1!

 

Baltimore lost a couple of players? How about a record setting 19 players on IR and before QB Joe Flacco went on IR he was playing injured for most of the 10 games he played in as the team went 3-7 under him. Alas, this was another team with bad backup QB problems. Ryan Mallett 1-1, Jimmy Clausen 0-2, Matt Schaub 1-1.

 

 

The Buffalo Bills have had QB Tyrod Taylor the entire year and he isn't nursing any injuries. The main problem with Buffalo is that they are a run first team that is primarily dependent on one particular running back to be able to make that run game work or should I say even attempt to make their run game work! When the Buffalo run game isn't working the entire offense and defense don't play as well. The 2016 Buffalo Bills offense is basically one dimensional and run first teams usually don't win many games without a stout defense to help them out.

 

This goes on to point out that if Bill Belichick were the Buffalo Bills head coach he wouldn't even attempt to enter a season as one dimensional as the Bills currently are on offense. The Patriots don't have as much talent on defense as the Bills have and I could see the defense so much better under him because he adapts and schemes his defenses to fit each opponent each week. He doesn't run the same lame scheme week after week while taking away players from one area to bolster another area like the Bills have done the last two seasons.

 

Lastly, the 2015 Patriots lost their starting RB in Dion Lewis after 6 games who was tearing things up at 4.8 YPC while also being a big threat out of the backfield. The Patriots then went to Blount, White, and Boulden to take up the slack. ( it pays to have solid depth) The Patriots also lost their starting star possession receiver in Julian Edelman after 9 games who Brady always looked to for a first down. The Patriots entire offensive line was in disarray most of the season as we all saw in that second game against Buffalo with Brady screaming at his linemen on the sidelines. No Patriots O-linemen went on to play a full 16 games

 

On the defensive side Jerod Mayo only played in 8 games, Jamie Collins played in 12 games as did Dont'a Hightower only played in 12 games. Ryan, Chung and McCourty each played in 14 games.

 

Injuries are just an excuse Bills fans embrace to feed their denial about their 4-5 team. Rex Ryan has 7 games to go to prove he is worth keeping! The 2016 Buffalo Bills could finish 11-5... or what's more likely is 7-9 because Ryan's defense can't seem to slow down even average QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And replace him with who?

 

This is as good a team as the Bills have fielded in many years. They are restricted on offense by the limitations of their QB and quality of their WRs and they are figuring out how to manage that -- and they did pretty well last night against a very good defense.

 

On defense their starting CBs have under-performed, their top two draft picks were hurt, and their best player decided to take the year off. Despite that they have held it together.

 

They are not that far away; 7 more yards last night and this morning we're calling this the best win for the franchise since Fitz beat NE. The last thing they need is another big upheaval.

Best post I've seen in weeks. Thank you. Lets just stop posting about starting over again. I can't take another 3 year rebuilding process , new schemes, learning curves, roster upheavals, etc etc. No.

 

They looked great Monday night. Really great. Had the best D in NFL running in circles.

Edited by 8and8-->NoMore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best post I've seen in weeks. Thank you. Lets just stop posting about starting over again. I can't take another 3 year rebuilding process , new schemes, learning curves, roster upheavals, etc etc. No.

 

They looked great Monday night. Really great. Had the best D in NFL running in circles.

 

So essentially we will be a one-sided team who is always up and down, never making the playoffs and a perpetual 6-10 or 7-9 team.

 

RIDICULOUS. Status quo to prevent change for mediocrity is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I said the Dareus and now Williams injury have hurt us.

 

Starting Tackles? Glenn missed two games and Sentral was never our starting tackle nor is he any better than Mills.

 

Shaq and Reggie? Two rookies, two unknowns.

 

McCoy missed two games. One that really didn't matter because we got destroyed.

 

Your making excuses and your reaching badly.

 

Lol, how long does it take to build a good team?

 

Your right, you can't wave a wand and fill holes. Look at all the holes Rexs defense is creating for this team.

 

Last year we needed better linebackers and defensive linemen. Now we need safety's and corners.

 

Does anyone remember how many holes the defense had before Rex got here?

 

No offense, but you have a real skewed perception of the job Rex is doing.

You make good points. I think that Rex will be gone unless he makes the playoffs. Whaley also hinders this team from getting better. He doesn't completely suck, but he continues to trade away our draft picks and sign players to huge contracts that don't appear to be worth the resources.

We would be way better off without these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...