YoloinOhio Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Yup. And we also would have to do it at the same time as we were trying to replace Mario and find a compliment to Watkins. Plus other needs like LB and RT. That's a tough shopping list for one offseason. That's a good point. You very well may be right, although I'd say that up until this season Haden was the better player. haden was so good before this year. One of the best IMO. He got hurt, and concussed, but even before early in the season he just looked bad. Wonder what happened there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 haden was so good before this year. One of the best IMO. He got hurt, and concussed, but even before early in the season he just looked bad. Wonder what happened there. No idea. Concussions? Or some other injury maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Yup. And we also would have to do it at the same time as we were trying to replace Mario and find a compliment to Watkins. Plus other needs like LB and RT. That's a tough shopping list for one offseason. That's a good point. You very well may be right, although I'd say that up until this season Haden was the better player. Agreed--I think ultimately he'll a slot between Haden and Maxwell at $11M AAV It wouldn't surprise me if the order of signing went Richie-Gilmore-Glenn. Unfortunately the first domino needs to fall in the next week or so, and the next in rapid succession Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 It would be good if they reworked contracts to free up space as they go...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 It would be good if they reworked contracts to free up space as they go...... You have to be careful about that. It can lead to some real problems in future years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalonian Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Anyone else notice the "LAR" for "LA Rams" in his career history? Kind of sickening how fast St. Louis had their team stripped from them. I'm old enough to remember the old LA Rams, but still feel bad for the St. Louis fans. I think that when a team moves it should be treated like a new franchise in terms of record, statistics, etc. I inderstand that it is essentially the same organization that existed in the old city, but there is nothing more important to the identity of a sports franchise than its location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Anyone else notice the "LAR" for "LA Rams" in his career history? Kind of sickening how fast St. Louis had their team stripped from them. I'm old enough to remember the old LA Rams, but still feel bad for the St. Louis fans. So St Louis has lost 2 NFL teams, and so has LA. I wouldn't be surprised if St Louis gets another chance in a few years, maybe close to the same time the new LA Rams fail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills!Win! Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Anyone else notice the "LAR" for "LA Rams" in his career history? Kind of sickening how fast St. Louis had their team stripped from them. I'm old enough to remember the old LA Rams, but still feel bad for the St. Louis fans. I don't feel for their multiple championships in baseball and their one super bowl win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) The mistake you are making is that you are giving credibility to Wells who in reality is not conducting an independent investigation. It is acting on behalf of the league. Wells knows what outcome the league wants before he starts his investigation. He then delivers it. He gets handsomely paid for delivering what the league wants delivered. The Wells report in this case had as much credibility as the Wells report did in deflategate. The Wells report in the Brady case was shredded and mocked in court. Incognito certainly didn't act appropriately in the Miami case but the portrayal of him was not a fair portrayal. The players in Miami sided with Incognito. Martin was a troubled person who couldn't handle and deal with the juvenile locker-room antics. Incognito certainly wasn't an angel in the Miami situation. He acted as a dense ranting juvenile. As idiotic as he behaved he didn't act out of malice. Which is the underpinning of bullying. The players in Miami did not side with incognito. Many players who were interviewed in the report said that Incognito acted inappropriately and that it was obvious that he was offensive to Martin. You don't like the Wells report. Fine. Issue your report with your sources and we can compare credibility, Edited February 7, 2016 by vincec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dulles Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 He didn't report anything that I heard. He was speculating on Twitter what might happen. I think Rotoworld is click-baiting. They do that!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 The players in Miami did not side with incognito. Many players who were interviewed in the report said that Incognito acted inappropriately and that it was obvious that he was offensive to Martin. You don't like the Wells report. Fine. Issue your report with your sources and we can compare credibility, That's what they said in public but in private they sided with Incognito. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 That's what they said in public but in private they sided with Incognito. What were you, a spot on the wall or their "tighty whities" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 What were you, a spot on the wall or their "tighty whities" That's what reports from behind the scenes were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMan Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 That's what they said in public but in private they sided with Incognito. I've been in a lot of locker rooms. That's how they talk. That whole thing was PC BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 That's what they said in public but in private they sided with Incognito. You spoke to them? What were they saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 If Glenn chases big LT money, he's probably the expendable one. He's good, but he might be able to find "great" money, which won't be the right choice for the bills amongst other priorities. Then you add LT to those priorities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 If Glenn chases big LT money, he's probably the expendable one. He's good, but he might be able to find "great" money, which won't be the right choice for the bills amongst other priorities. No He can be franchised for the amount that he'll likely get with a new deal Don't let him walk; that would be stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Agreed--I think ultimately he'll a slot between Haden and Maxwell at $11M AAV It wouldn't surprise me if the order of signing went Richie-Gilmore-Glenn. Unfortunately the first domino needs to fall in the next week or so, and the next in rapid succession That seems like a reasonable order. Richie seems the most logical choice for the first deal. It'll be the smallest of the three contracts and he probably has the fewest options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 If Whaley had to choose between keeping Glenn and Kyle Williams, I would stay with Glenn. This draft is deep in DTs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmotionallyUnstable Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 If Whaley had to choose between keeping Glenn and Kyle Williams, I would stay with Glenn. This draft is deep in DTs Glenn trumps all IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts