B-Man Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 For kicks, here’s a round-up of tweets from the We Demand More Gun Control crowd. With self-righteous gusto, they automatically assumed that a firearm was involved in the Ohio State attack, and then immediately politicized the horrible event. The group really outdid themselves in looking more awful than usual, especially as the “weapon” used in today’s attack was an automobile, and a knife… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 (edited) For kicks, here’s a round-up of tweets from the We Demand More Gun Control crowd. With self-righteous gusto, they automatically assumed that a firearm was involved in the Ohio State attack, and then immediately politicized the horrible event. The group really outdid themselves in looking more awful than usual, especially as the “weapon” used in today’s attack was an automobile, and a knife… Yet the gun control crowd remains stunningly silent with regard to police officers being executed. edit: did I say 'stunningly'? I meant to say 'predictably". Edited November 29, 2016 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Heh................. David Burge @iowahawkblog Thoughts and prayers for all the evening news editors who had to scrap all those 10-minute gun violence segments 1:54 PM - 28 Nov 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Welcome one. Welcome all. Discuss your hate of guns. Discuss why you can't defend yourself with a gun unless someone else has one too. Else wise, if you defend yourself with a gun you're a kitty. And the rest of you. Don't miss the show in the rip joe McKnight thread. Liberal gun hating meltdown http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/190294-rip-joe-mcknight/page-4?do=findComment&comment=4144389 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Yet the gun control crowd remains stunningly silent with regard to police officers being executed. edit: did I say 'stunningly'? I meant to say 'predictably". You do know that the NRA is a leader in LEO firearms training and safety instruction, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You do know that the NRA is a leader in LEO firearms training and safety instruction, right? I'm not seeing your point. Could you clarify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Yet the gun control crowd remains stunningly silent with regard to police officers being executed. edit: did I say 'stunningly'? I meant to say 'predictably". You mean we should have tighter gun controls so these cop killers can't get guns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You mean we should have tighter gun controls so these cop killers can't get guns? should we disarm police to any degree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I'm not seeing your point. Could you clarify? They support the LEOs by teaching them how to shoot back. What was your point? They should release a statement every time a bad guy uses a gun? If you don't already know their stance on CRIME, a press release won't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sig1Hunter Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 should we disarm police to any degree? Disarm? They barely arm me! Unless you consider my Vietnam era government surplus M-16 as legit armament in today's world. I swear it has hash marks on it from the Charlies it killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 should we disarm police to any degree? no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 no But we should disarm everyone else right? Go ahead. Say it. It's okay. You can't run the US like a true progressive until you disarm the people, amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 But we should disarm everyone else right? Go ahead. Say it. It's okay. You can't run the US like a true progressive until you disarm the people, amirite? The question was about the the shooting of police officers and what gun control people thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 (edited) They support the LEOs by teaching them how to shoot back. What was your point? They should release a statement every time a bad guy uses a gun? If you don't already know their stance on CRIME, a press release won't help. My point was that the gun control crowd comes out of the woodwork whenever citizens kill each other, but don't seem to give a crap about police officers being killed. I thought my post was pretty clear. But I'm interested to learn what exactly you thought I was saying. I don't know the polices' stance on CRIME? Really? Press releases? Seriously? Is there actually something I posted that gives you the impression that I have anything against the police? If so, then what? Edited December 3, 2016 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You mean we should have tighter gun controls so these cop killers can't get guns? You really think that anyone who has the mindset to murder a cop (or anyone for that matter) is a) legally able to own a firearm now and b) going to follow any additional gun laws put in place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You really think that anyone who has the mindset to murder a cop (or anyone for that matter) is a) legally able to own a firearm now and b) going to follow any additional gun laws put in place? The problem is killers get guns too easily. Easy access to guns helps cop killers. That's my only point. You banging your head in frustration to your own straw man is funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 The problem is killers get guns too easily. Easy access to guns helps cop killers. That's my only point. You banging your head in frustration to your own straw man is funny So how do you propose to make it more difficult for cop killers to get firearms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 So how do you propose to make it more difficult for cop killers to get firearms? You can't think of anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You can't think of anything? I'm asking you. You're the one that brought it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I'm asking you. You're the one that brought it up I didn't start the thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 (edited) I didn't start the thread You posted this: The problem is killers get guns too easily. Easy access to guns helps cop killers. That's my only point. You banging your head in frustration to your own straw man is funny He asked you how you would do that. Stop being such a !@#$ing twerp. Edited December 2, 2016 by DC Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You posted this: He asked you how you would do that. Stop being such a !@#$ing twerp. Because he simply doesn't have the guts to openly admit here what he believes: that the second amendment should be abolished and all guns should be confiscated except from police and military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I didn't start the thread I see so the game now is you only answers questions in threads you started. And you wondered why I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I see so the game now is you only answers questions in threads you started. And you wondered why I Well, more guns won't stop the shooting of the police Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Well, more guns won't stop the shooting of the police So I assume the converse of that is true in your mind. If so how do you propose to fix that? (he's asks knowing he won't get a straight answer) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 So I assume the converse of that is true in your mind. If so how do you propose to fix that? (he's asks knowing he won't get a straight answer) Assume away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Assume away! I have to assume because you're either to dumb, chicken or both to tell us what you're thinking with regard to reducing criminal gun violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I have to assume because you're either to dumb, chicken or both to tell us what you're thinking with regard to reducing criminal gun violence. My point went over your head. I was basically arguing that if you are going to have a society flooded with guns, cops are obviously going to be shot. You agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 CIVIL RIGHTS: Democrats promise to kill any national conceal carry reciprocity agreement in the senate. Imagine having this debate over which places you could speak freely in, and in which other places you had better watch yourself. Oh, wait… . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 My point went over your head. I was basically arguing that if you are going to have a society flooded with guns, cops are obviously going to be shot. You agree? Was society flooded with 50% more guns in 2016 than 2015? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Was society flooded with 50% more guns in 2016 than 2015? Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick? Wow that's deep. So what's your solution the gun issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) Wow that's deep. So what's your solution the gun issue? I've always been partial to this solution: (NSFW due to language) Edited December 3, 2016 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) I've always been partial to this solution: (NSFW due to language) How very Progressive If ammo is affordable, how does a new shooter learn to aim and handle a firearm safely? Then again, if something like that happened I'd be sitting on a gold mines worth of 22, 38, 5.56, and 30-06 Edited December 3, 2016 by /dev/null Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Do i get to laugh my ass off when McKnight was high on PCP and charging the guy before shot. Then on the ground and trying to bite the guys ankles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 How very Progressive If ammo is affordable, how does a new shooter learn to aim and handle a firearm safely? Then again, if something like that happened I'd be sitting on a gold mines worth of 22, 38, 5.56, and 30-06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Buffalo Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Guns are much like political parties: the ideal amount of either is zero, but given the reality of both's existence, the next best amount is "billions". I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Too many people in this world anymore for guns. Unless they use those guns for mass genocide then the answer is zero. Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick? Depends if you set it for one second or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted. What state do you live in? What are its gun purchasing requirements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted. There are already background checks and now here in California there are going to be background checks to buy ammo. How the hell is that going to work? What they need to do is have gun permits renewed every few years with a new background check some at that time. I'd have no problem with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts