3rdnlng Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 She's taken on PPP as her mantra. Certain to give Gator a chubbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) Does Hillary stand for anything? Not being facetious but I've never seen a politician alter their statements/positions so often and seamlessly based on what they perceive as public opinion or for the appeasement of dominant lobby groups. Beyond a lack of character, I am seriously wondering if at the core she has any platform at all, or even worse any real understanding of global affairs and economics. Edited August 14, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Does Hillary stand for anything? Not being facetious but I've never seen a politician alter their statements/positions so often and seamlessly based on what they perceive as public opinion or for the appeasement of dominant lobby groups. Beyond a lack of character, I am seriously wondering if at the core she has any platform at all, or even worse any real understanding of global affairs and economics. Unfortunately the skills required to get elected and the skills required to govern well are not at all the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted August 14, 2014 Author Share Posted August 14, 2014 Does Hillary stand for anything? That's a silly question. She's entitled to be the President of The USA. She stands for Hillary, gaining wealth, power, and weight. Not necessarily in that order either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 (edited) Unfortunately the skills required to get elected and the skills required to govern well are not at all the same. Shed be an extreme example of that maxim Hillary's platform is simply Hillary. If she gets power she'd have no idea what to do with it. President Hillary = poof* = abyss Edited August 15, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 It's not just Hillary. Look who the dems have on their "A team": Obama Biden Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid Debbie Wassermann Schultz Can anyone picture a sorrier leadership of a party, ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Can anyone picture a sorrier leadership of a party, ever? With a bench that includes Wendy Davis and Fauxcahontas Warren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Will Biden run for President? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Shed be an extreme example of that maxim Dude never put Hillary and Maxim in the same sentence again. Please. It conjured up images that should never be conjured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Dude never put Hillary and Maxim in the same sentence again. Please. It conjured up images that should never be conjured. My thoughts exactly but don't worry, we're safe. The Maxim studio is on the 2nd floor. Hillary would never make it up the stairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Dude never put Hillary and Maxim in the same sentence again. Please. It conjured up images that should never be conjured. Maxim...machine gun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted August 15, 2014 Author Share Posted August 15, 2014 With a bench that includes Wendy Davis and Fauxcahontas Warren. Don't forget Tony Weiner, Gubenor Moonbeam Brown, and who could forget the one that people like... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 As per above........ “One of the many oddities of the English language,” it has been noted, “is the multitude of different names given to collections or groups, be they beasts, birds, people or things. Many of these collective nouns are beautiful and evocative, even poetic.” You’ve got your gaggle of geese. You’ve got your pack of dogs. You’ve got your stuck of jellyfish. You’ve got your colony of ants. And many, many more. To these I propose to add another: An embarrassment of Democrats. That they’re incapable of embarrassment is part of the equation, but just part. This is a party led by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi. Hillary Clinton stands in the wings. An embarrassment of Democrats. Admit it. It’s perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 An embarrassment of Democrats. Admit it. It’s perfect. It certainly is. I am not sure if it's funny or a shame that most Democrats will never get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/high-fashion-expense-hillary-travel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) Former CIA Director: "Mrs Clinton has blood on her hands everywhere" http://youtu.be/afQaIEQOr_I Edited August 17, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 An embarrassment of Democrats. Admit it. It’s perfect. to be honest, it seems to infect just about anyone taking up public office nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Former CIA Director: "Mrs Clinton has blood on her hands everywhere" http://youtu.be/afQaIEQOr_I And 24 months from now you will not only have justified your reason why you will vote for her, but also explained why those of us who do not support Hillary are misogynists and/or racists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Clinton/Warren vs Palin/Bachman This could be so much fun ... The comedic value would be priceless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Former CIA Director: "Mrs Clinton has blood on her hands everywhere" http://youtu.be/afQaIEQOr_I Never a CIA director, in fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 Clinton/Warren vs Palin/Bachman This could be so much fun ... The comedic value would be priceless No, we've had a circus for years now. There are no laughs left. It's time to elect a principled leader for President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 No, we've had a circus for years now. There are no laughs left. It's time to elect a principled leader for President. There are more laughs left than principled leaders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) There are more laughs left than principled leaders. Who are they on either side? Rand Paul was a real conservative now his message is starting to get diluted too as he wooes big money support. With him going down its just same old, same old from all of them. I couldnt tell you the difference between bachman, santorum, Perry, etc ... except that they all suck. Just spouting the same big money, special interest crap that's clearly not resonating with american voters. Edited August 17, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 and the nightmare begins .... Hillary Clinton heading to Iowa for first time since 2008 http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2014/08/18/hillary-clinton-iowa-harkin-steak-fry/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 (edited) I'm waiting for her peeps to announce her "listening tour" of the nation. She flogged that dog through NYS a number of years ago and it paid off for her then, so she'll undoubtedly ramp it up again. She'll feel our pain in Oh so many small towns across this great land.... Boots and Saddles, Hill'ry! Edited August 19, 2014 by Keukasmallies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Hillary is inevitable no longer by Tom Keane Hillary Clinton is no longer the inevitable next President of the United States, a summertime development that is not unexpected yet still surprises. Now the question is: Who will be the first to mount a challenge? Two potential challengers (although both deny they’ll run) hail from right here: liberal firebrand and US senator Elizabeth Warren and our cool and collected governor, Deval Patrick. The interest they’ve attracted is evidence of Massachusetts’ continuing influence in national affairs. What a difference six months has made. Back then, polls showed Clinton handily beating potential Republican rivals. A February 2014 McClatchy-Marist survey, for example, showed her with a 58-38 percent lead over former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, a 58-37 edge over New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, and a 58-38 advantage over Kentucky Senator Rand Paul. Her numbers were so strong it seemed possible that no serious figure would contest her for the Democratic nomination. More at the link http://www.bostonglo...4jUL/story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 (edited) More at the link http://www.bostonglo...4jUL/story.html well B-Man she will present a dilemma for you and other neocon kooks on the board.... Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Is A 'War Hawk' WASHINGTON (AP) — Calling Hillary Rodham Clinton "a war hawk," Sen. Rand Paul says that if the former secretary of state seeks the presidency, some voters will worry that she will get the U.S. involved in another Mideast war. Paul is a leading anti-interventionist in the GOP and is considering running for president. Last year he opposed President Barack Obama's call for military action in Syria. In an interview that aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," Paul predicted a "transformational election" if the Democrats nominate "a war hawk like Hillary Clinton." "I think that's what scares the Democrats the most, is that in a general election, were I to run, there's gonna be a lot of independents and even some Democrats who say, 'You know what? We are tired of war,'" Paul said. "We're worried that Hillary Clinton will get us involved in another Middle Eastern war, because she's so gung-ho." http://www.huffingto..._n_5704507.html Edited August 25, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 well B-Man she will present a dilemma for you and other neocon kooks on the board.... So we can add marketing to the ridiculously long list of things about which you know nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 and the nightmare begins .... Hillary Clinton heading to Iowa for first time since 2008 http://onpolitics.us...rkin-steak-fry/ You have to give Hillary some credit for knowing what a wreck the Obama 2nd term would be and for getting off that bus at a very good time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 So we can add marketing to the ridiculously long list of things about which you know nothing. What ?? you mean she's not a "war hawk" ? Even funnier of course, is jstp's wildly false belief that conservatives would automatically support war. not surprising really. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 (edited) What ?? you mean she's not a "war hawk" ? Even funnier of course, is jstp's wildly false belief that conservatives would automatically support war. not surprising really. . It's particularly funny to me that a man who so desperately wants to see all Jews wiped off the planet tries to peddle the idea that the problem with conservatives if that they just love going to war. Edited August 25, 2014 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 This would be an interesting primary challenger to Hillary... http://hamptonroads.com/2014/08/former-sen-jim-webb-raises-profile-iowa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 There's a growing feeling that Hilly won't run in 2016. I'm starting to believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 This would be an interesting primary challenger to Hillary... http://hamptonroads....es-profile-iowa Yeah, but what's his stance on Ferguson ?...the left needs to know. Point of No Return: Democrats Want Definitive Signal from Hillary Clinton .....In the past few months, Clinton has concluded a big book tour with dozens of news interviews; distanced herself (either in small or substantial ways) from her party’s currently unpopular president; and is now heading next month to Iowa, which traditionally holds the first presidential nominating contest. What’s significant about all of this activity, Democrats say, is that the more she walks and talks like a presidential candidate – effectively freezing out any other Democrats even contemplating a run – the more difficult it becomes to turn around and say no. “The longer it goes, the harder it becomes for her not to run, unless there is a significant reason she can't,”.... (Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 (edited) There's a growing feeling that Hilly won't run in 2016. I'm starting to believe it. Don't believe it. She's running. And we'll elect her. Because as a country, if we're too stupid to realize electing a black man president for the sake of electing a black man president was a horrible idea, we'll undoubtedly rush to elect a woman simply because she's a woman. Edited August 25, 2014 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 What ?? you mean she's not a "war hawk" ? Even funnier of course, is jstp's wildly false belief that conservatives would automatically support war. not surprising really. . True conservatives wouldn't, historically they were non-interventionist vs dems. But note I said "neocon" who's very creation was driven by an agenda to make the party rely heavily on foreign intervention and military might. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 25, 2014 Share Posted August 25, 2014 I'm sure the new TV series Madame Secretary won't hurt PR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 True conservatives wouldn't, historically they were non-interventionist vs dems. But note I said "neocon" who's very creation was driven by an agenda to make the party rely heavily on foreign intervention and military might. Every time I see someone reference neocons, I wait for them next to start discussing the breathable comfort of Zubaz. Get current, fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Finally ! !...........................(focus group results must have come back) Hillary Clinton Breaks Silence On Ferguson http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/28/hillary-clinton-ferguson_n_5731470.html?utm_hp_ref=politics Sure, what Hillary said was insipid. But it was always going to be. Which is why she should have said nothing . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Finally ! !...........................(focus group results must have come back) Hillary Clinton Breaks Silence On Ferguson http://www.huffingto...hp_ref=politics Sure, what Hillary said was insipid. But it was always going to be. Which is why she should have said nothing . But her handlers were smart enough to not let her mention it until it was largely over and off the front page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts