Jump to content

"The Culture of Failure"


PromoTheRobot

Recommended Posts

 

 

I know, right? It's like they just couldn't WAIT to get their first opportunity to squat and drop all over everything.

while I don't completely disagree with everything in the article. I completely agree with this. Without a doubt you are correct.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Illogical thought process through that article IMO.

 

He starts out showing how us Bills fans are used to losing.....and he's right. His comments on EJ trying to rev up the crowd were likely spot on. Us fans have been following loss after loss with no playoffs for 13 years........and Hell Yes, we just KNOW that we are going to lose the lead at the end of the game to the Pats & it will take a while of winning to stop naturally believing that that will be the case.

 

He then follows to suggest that the same mentality is endemic in the players. The thing is though, the players haven't experienced loss after loss with no playoffs for 13 years. In fact, a vast majority of our players have not seen 4 seasons with the Bills.....and over half of our starters have only seen 2 or less seasons with the team.

 

He could argue the logic of a loser mentality being run through the Bills system(which may or may not be the case)......but that would be a vastly different loser mentality to the one he describes for us fans.

 

In short, I see no reason for his comments apart from simply wanting to rev up people's emotions by calling the Bills losers.......but I guess that's just what the modern day media does.

My thoughts exactly - well played Dibs. :thumbsup:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the parachute guys dropping in on the stadium before the players even come out of the tunnel is a joke. It's nothing close to a plane or chopper flying overhead at the end of the National Anthem. It brings tears to my eyes every time. This time I said "eh"

 

Since the sequestration, there has been flyovers. Pretty sure I constantly see them at NASCAR events. Pretty sure they've been at many other sporting events as well.

 

I see planes from the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Base flying around town all the time.

 

whatever their budget allocates for training and certification.....are you telling me that just one of those missions couldn't be scheduled and coordinated to fly over the ralph on a sunday at 1 pm ?......sequestration is a total nonsense excuse.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I see planes from the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Base flying around town all the time.

 

whatever their budget allocates for training and certification.....are you telling me that just one of those missions couldn't be scheduled and coordinated to fly over the ralph on a sunday at 1 pm ?......sequestration is a total nonsense excuse.

this x1,000,000,000

 

Absolute joke and I don't believe it because I've seen other sporting events do them since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want reporters to write something different? Then do something different as an organization, win more than you lose. Hire a GM who can draft guys who make the pro-bowl first team, better yet draft some HOFers. Hire a coach who can win and who hires a OC and DC who are competant(seems like we've had one or the other but not both for a long time).

Didn't they do all those things this offseason?

 

Manage the salary cap. Anybody care to add up what we spent on wastes like Merriman, Anderson, Kelsay, Fitz, Brad Smith, etc
Those players didn't work out as well as hoped, but that happens a lot in free agency. If you don't believe me, ask somebody from DC.. Besides, it's not like you're the one signing checks at One Bills Drive, so who cares how much money they got paid...

 

As for the players, make a play a crucial time. Over these 13 years Ive never seem a team so clutch at finding ways to blow games(McKelvin fumble against the Pats, Stevie's drop against the Steelers, the on-side kicks against Dallas, and on and on). This Sunday was more of the same, drive killing penalties, a couple of key drops, finding ways to lose a game that was there for the win. If Im an employee and I'm in the bottom third of my peers, I wouldnt expect my boss to write a glowing performance review of me
I agree with this paragraph. It was frustrating to watch, but I'm encouraged that they finally seem headed in the right direction and hopefully they'll turn it around.

 

I dont think he was writing anything about not giving Marrone and Co a chance or running anybody out of town. Yes there was some positives in their performance last Sunday, there is potential. However potential just means you've havent done it yet. Reporters could write about how great the Bills are but they wouldnt be reporters, they would be fiction writers.
And writing that the players on 2013's team are somehow impacted by the 2000-2012 versions isn't fiction?

 

Even for the most optimistic fans I wonder, when exactly can we expect to get to the playoffs and respectability? Next year, the year after that, exactly when?
Marked improvement this year, playoff contention next year... But I might be different than most Bills fans - I don't need or crave the validation of my team winning. I watch because it's fun, it entertains me; I love being a Bills fan. I obviously want them to do well, but since it's out of my control, I enjoy it for what it is: a good time with friends.

 

Defending the article is essentially defending that notion that a 24 year old man who was driven enough to set and achieve a goal millions of others can only dream of, will suddenly cave because of his team's history.

 

About the only thing this incarnation of the Bills has in common with any of the teams over the last 13 years is the name and stadium.

 

GO BILLS!

Edited by Campy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I see planes from the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Base flying around town all the time.

 

whatever their budget allocates for training and certification.....are you telling me that just one of those missions couldn't be scheduled and coordinated to fly over the ralph on a sunday at 1 pm ?......sequestration is a total nonsense excuse.

At least once a week those giant C-130's fly over my house so low you think they're going to scrape the tree tops. And every time I come running out of the house to see them because it never gets old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the parachute guys dropping in on the stadium before the players even come out of the tunnel is a joke. It's nothing close to a plane or chopper flying overhead at the end of the National Anthem. It brings tears to my eyes every time. This time I said "eh"

 

Since the sequestration, there has been flyovers. Pretty sure I constantly see them at NASCAR events. Pretty sure they've been at many other sporting events as well.

 

Thats funny you said that..me and the fellas i was with joked that we get the parachute guys at Ricmond games...for a crowd of 6,000!(btw, we almost beat NC State last week)

 

In terms of the noise, i thought it was loud. I was in 2nd row Upper deck, and it had to louder in lower bowl. One guy with us for first Bills game, he thought it was the loudest he had ever heard a stadium, and he has prolly been to about 20 games he thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you kidding? You don't think this franchise has had a culture of losing for the last 13 years? Did you even read the article, or just the headline? The point of the article is not that Manuel, Marrone et al are failures; his point is that they have to overcome an expectation and acceptance of failure that is embedded in a franchise that has known little else for a generation. He contrasts that with expectations and history in New England. How can you dispute any of it?

 

From various eyewitnesses, I can disagree with the "poignant moment" "at the end of the third quarter, when the rookie quarterback walked toward the sideline with a 21-17 lead over the Patriots and pleaded with a subdued crowd to provide a boost". By accounts of those that were there, the stadium was plenty loud with the usual football-knowledgeable fans, the stadium was quiet because we normally don't make noise when the O has the ball, and it seemed to those present that by his demeanor EJ was just excited and they humored him by getting loud when they normally wouldn't. When the Pats took over it was "jet engine time" again.

 

I think the point that a culture of losing must be overcome is OK, but to lead off with an apparently specious "poignant" vignette about our poor draftee QB who has to exhort the fans to cheer for him and a critique of the loudness of the stadium, made the whole article disagreeable. We still have one of the loudest stadiums in the league with the most knowledgeable fans as long as the team is playing hard and not "phoning it in" or buried. The fact that it could be even louder in more exciting games, is really irrelevant.

 

I live in St Louis, where they publish crap about how and when to cheer for the football team in the newspaper!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing inspires greatness like being told that your team has always been a failure and you'll probably fail too.

 

PTR

 

Someone writes the standard pedestrian column of the Bills' sordid history and record. Do you honestly believe that what is written has an affect on how the team performs? The Bills succeed and fail on their own actions. It has nothing to do with what is written about them. Why do you get so unhinged over something that is so inconsequential? What's next? Blaming the fans for mounting losses?

 

Let's face it in its recent history the Bills are more noted for failures than they are for its successes. Do you expect the commentary to be glowing when the team has had losing seasons in nine out of the past ten seasons? Do you expect the commentary to be radiantly positive for a team that has gone 13 consecutive years and still counting out of the playoffs? Do you expect warranted media skepticism to immediately vanish after a loss in the opening game of the season?

 

You can make the argument that this year is separate and different from the prior years. That may be true to a certain extent but the context for the column dealing with franchise and fan mind-set is much wider. Whether you like it or not there is a historical record that does influence perception. If you want to change the perception then win more. The issue isn't about the outsiders; it is about the performers.

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the parachute guys dropping in on the stadium before the players even come out of the tunnel is a joke. It's nothing close to a plane or chopper flying overhead at the end of the National Anthem. It brings tears to my eyes every time. This time I said "eh"

 

Since the sequestration, there has been flyovers. Pretty sure I constantly see them at NASCAR events. Pretty sure they've been at many other sporting events as well.

One long-standing tradition that will be missing from Jaguars games — and from all NFL games — is military flyovers. Because of federal budget cutbacks, they’ve been discontinued. They were a great way to honor the role of the military in the local community

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Some perspective on the word "culture"-- From Wikipedia: "Organizational culture is the behavior of humans who are part of an organization and the meanings that the people attach to their actions. Culture includes the organization values, visions, norms, working language, systems, symbols, beliefs and habits. It is also the pattern of such collective behaviors and assumptions that are taught to new organizational members as a way of perceiving, and even thinking and feeling."

 

Does anyone REALLY believe the people in the organization value failure? Do you believe they have visions of building a losing team? Do you believe Doug Marrone is attempting to instill habits conducive to losing? Neither do I. A culture of failure would be evident by not trying to do something different. Dick Jauron would still be the head coach. JP Losman would still be our starting QB. Doug Marrone would start off his pre-game speeches with "Well, guys, we're probably going to lose today, but go out there and make a good showing". People throw around the word "culture" like it's something that is locked in the closet in Russ Brandon's office.

 

"History of mediocre results" is factually accurate; "Culture of failure" is the author's opinion.

 

2) Gleason's job is to write articles to generate revenue and internet eyeballs to the Buffalo News. Preaching patience and hope doesn't sell. Provocation sells. Communicating in extremes sells. And we react to provocative things because we either share the belief, or we disagree strongly with the belief and are afraid other people will be influenced, weakening our position.

 

Think for yourself. Trust your own eyes. GO BILLS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen them since that BB. That's all I'm saying. Almost 100% positive I've seen then at NASCAR races. And at other football games too. Off the top of my head I couldn't tell you which ones but in sure I've seen them.

 

 

 

Thats funny you said that..me and the fellas i was with joked that we get the parachute guys at Ricmond games...for a crowd of 6,000!(btw, we almost beat NC State last week)

 

In terms of the noise, i thought it was loud. I was in 2nd row Upper deck, and it had to louder in lower bowl. One guy with us for first Bills game, he thought it was the loudest he had ever heard a stadium, and he has prolly been to about 20 games he thought.

again, I never said it wasn't loud. It was. Just not as loud as I've heard other openers, or other games in the regular season louder than last Sunday.

 

Considering all that was going on with new coaches, new QB, 2nd half lead against the Pats. I expected more. I was left unimpressed honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the game on television.

 

I noticed that when the Patriots were driving for their game winning field goal there were a lot of empty lower seats.

 

And I could swear I heard booing from the fans after the came finished.

there wasn't much booing from where I sat, but boy your right about the empty seats. As soon as we punted and gave them the ball with a few minutes left, everyone knew it. Which IMO, makes Buckys article completely believable and proven. Edited by mrags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Illogical thought process through that article IMO.

 

He starts out showing how us Bills fans are used to losing.....and he's right. His comments on EJ trying to rev up the crowd were likely spot on. Us fans have been following loss after loss with no playoffs for 13 years........and Hell Yes, we just KNOW that we are going to lose the lead at the end of the game to the Pats & it will take a while of winning to stop naturally believing that that will be the case.

 

 

According to TBD'ians who were there, EJ was revving up the crowd when the O had the ball and they'd normally be quiet, and "just excited", not "poignant"

So not "spot on"

Although the fans expecting to lose to the Pats part is probably correct

 

Someone writes the standard pedestrian column of the Bills' sordid history and record. Do you honestly believe that what is written has an affect on how the team performs? The Bills succeed and fail on their own actions. It has nothing to do with what is written about them. Why do you get so unhinged over something that is so inconsequential? What's next? Blaming the fans for mounting losses?

 

Er, except it wasn't about the "sordid history and record", it was titled "Bills fighting a losing battle with culture of failure".

 

In other words, not only is our history and record sordid, we're sordid now and going to stay that way because we're losing the battle.

After one game.

 

Donkey Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you kidding? You don't think this franchise has had a culture of losing for the last 13 years? Did you even read the article, or just the headline? The point of the article is not that Manuel, Marrone et al are failures; his point is that they have to overcome an expectation and acceptance of failure that is embedded in a franchise that has known little else for a generation. He contrasts that with expectations and history in New England. How can you dispute any of it?

 

It's not a matter of dispute. It's a matter of whether it's necessary to write the piece, which it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Meh. Whaley picked a QB who looks like he is gonna be a good one. It's the single most important thing that has happened to this team in more than a decade. Let's see how that plays out before condemning everyone...

 

Spot on. This team has been overhauled top to bottom in the past year. Let's see what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so I know I got this straight, you're calling for firing the GM, college scouts, pro personnel staff, coaching staff, Brandon & Overdorf(sp?)?

 

Uh no thats not what Im saying, The new GM and coaching staff will be given their opportunity. Some changes have been made in the scouting department. Overdorf going wouldnt bother me. My whole post was just about this----you want reporters to write something different--simple-----win more than you lose. Because if you dont, instead of the Bills havent made the playoffs in 13 years, the only thing that will change is that number, as in next year it will be the Bills havent made the playoffs in 14 years.

Edited by billsfan714
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny how pieces like this upset some Bills fans. If all you want to read about is the feel-good moral victories and "upside" of this team, go straight to a Chris Brown article on BB.com. It amazes me when people on this board pout about ANY media piece that doesn't praise the team for playing "good enough" not to get blown out.

 

The Gleason article validates itself with every hurt feeling it produces.

There is a loser mentality when fans are ok with the moral victory acheived by losing a two point home opener to your biggest rival.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on. This team has been overhauled top to bottom in the past year. Let's see what we got.

 

The on-field people have changed but promotions in the front office ensure some of the same faces remain.

 

There's a LOT of season left to begin formulating opinions on everyone. But giving someone a new title that's been a part of the organization doesn't clear them from criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there wasn't much booing from where I sat, but boy your right about the empty seats. As soon as we punted and gave them the ball with a few minutes left, everyone knew it. Which IMO, makes Buckys article completely believable and proven.

 

Bucky never talked about the end of the game.

 

He was trying to construct an argument that EJ needed to implore the Bills fans to be louder at the end of the 3rd quarter.

 

The Bills were on offense when the 3rd quarter ended.

 

I'm not defending idiot fans who leave early when they should be contributing to crowd noise but you're wrong about Bucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny how pieces like this upset some Bills fans. If all you want to read about is the feel-good moral victories and "upside" of this team, go straight to a Chris Brown article on BB.com. It amazes me when people on this board pout about ANY media piece that doesn't praise the team for playing "good enough" not to get blown out.

 

The Gleason article validates itself with every hurt feeling it produces.

There is a loser mentality when fans are ok with the moral victory acheived by losing a two point home opener to your biggest rival.

 

It's funny how some TBD posters have this binary attitude: we're either pining for "feel good moral victory" pieces and crapping our drawers for anything that doesn't praise the team, or we have to be down with craptastic "fighting a losing battle with culture of failure" pieces which (per eyewitnesses) inaccurately describe the actions of a rook QB and the crowd during the 1st game of the season. This wonderful binary attitude allows them to dismiss and condemn anything that they disagree with.

 

How about this: most of us do just fine with accurate and reasoned criticism, as can be seen by non-reaction to a number of articles that fairly describe negative aspects of the team's play on Sunday, and positive response to pieces on this board like "a few thoughts on the game in no particular order". Critique is fine. But our sense of fair play and accuracy is outraged by an article that puffs an inaccurate description of the crowd and the promising rookie into a sweeping negative generalization? That article is a prime example of a loser mentality on the part of the writer, and should get lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Dallas Monday night was loudest I've ever heard it.

 

It was ear hurting loud.

 

Just awesome.

 

I agree, that's was my first game and I got season tix the next year... It also helped it was the first Monday night game in Buffalo in forever, and it was after 1pm, so people had PLENTY of time to shock their liver!!! Was a great time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was there sunday.The old guy with the Kiko jersey.The crowd is not even close to the 90`s.Cell phones have made the youngsters,....bland. No social skills. No energy.

 

While I don't disagree with your comment about cell phones, the seating capacity at the stadium is far smaller than it was during the Super Bowl years.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wilson_Stadium#Seating_capacity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see planes from the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Base flying around town all the time.

 

whatever their budget allocates for training and certification.....are you telling me that just one of those missions couldn't be scheduled and coordinated to fly over the ralph on a sunday at 1 pm ?......sequestration is a total nonsense excuse.

 

Well, yes, I'll tell you that. Training missions take place over designated training areas and (with some exceptions) at higher altitude (of course the plane has to take off and get to said area flying over the city per usual). Flying over a public stadium at low altitude poses a different level of risk, and a different level of planning and training by pilots with special certification is required to earn the exception to the relevant federal regulations.

 

If a pilot, military or other, without said training and inadequate (low altitude, densely populated area) planning was sent on a flyover, had a mechanical and put the plane into the crowd, y'all would be first in line to barbeque the officials for allowing it.

 

Hopeful, pilot

Edited by Hopeful
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take on the crowd:

 

It was the home opener of a new regime. One would expect a very loud crowd.

 

Was the crowd noise above average? I would say yes.

 

Was it as loud as I was hoping/expecting? I would say no.

 

Am I ever satisfied with the level of crowd noise at the stadium? No (however I wasn't at the Dallas MNF game).

 

Does it bother me that I have to shame other Bills fans into making noise during key junctures of the game by turning around and encouraging them when I'm simultaneously shouting/screaming AND clapping my hands or banging on a loud object? Yes it bothers the crap out of me.

 

Has my voice yet recovered from Sunday's game? It was more or less back to normal by Thursday.

 

 

Do I believe that fans can affect the outcome of games if they can generate enough noise? Obviously yes.

 

Does it bother me when fans leave early when our opponent is driving down the field for a potential game-winning score? What do you think?

 

Do I think that a fanbase that is honored as "The 12th Man" on the stadium ring have a greater obligation to make as much noise as they can during certain times in a game? Yes.

 

Do I agree with Bucky Gleason? No. To criticize the crowd for not being loud enough for his liking at the end of the 3rd quarter is silly, IMO.

 

Moreover I don't think the "culture of losing" has/had anything to do with the crowd performance.

Edited by San Jose Bills Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entry : I went in a little after 11:30, no problem, only 4 people ahead of me to get wanded, the slow down was the old (70's? 80's?) guy emptying his pockets.

 

Noise : Was not as loud as previous games I've been to, but there were a lot of Patriots fans there, the was a large group in my section. So that didn't help. But there was a lot more sit/stand/sit going on during the 2nd half than the 1st half.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay close attention to Gleason's bolded interpretations of the crowd.

 

Gleason is saying that the crowd is expecting to lose and that is why we weren't as loud as he thought we should be.

 

That is the thesis of his article:

 

The most poignant moment during EJ Manuel’s debut Sunday didn’t come after his first touchdown pass or after his first loss. It emerged at the end of the third quarter, when the rookie quarterback walked toward the sideline with a 21-17 lead over the Patriots and pleaded with a subdued crowd to provide a boost.

 

Manuel spread his arms wide, with his palms turned toward the heavens, waving his hands and urging reluctant fans to get involved. It was as if he begged them to forget about the past and fight through their fears, to climb aboard and join him in a new era that would be better than those in recent years.

Bills fans politely obliged with shallow enthusiasm, the way they do when players plead for support or the Jumbotron tells them it’s time to cheer. A few moments later, they returned to their natural thought process of wondering when and how – not if – Buffalo would blow another one to New England.

“This is my first year here,” Manuel said the other day during his weekly news conference, “so I’m not used to losing.”

You couldn’t help but appreciate his youthful innocence, but he obviously hadn’t been around long enough to understand the thinking in this town. Manuel thought fans were quiet going into the fourth quarter because they were being respectful of the Bills’ offense, which was on the field.

Actually, what he saw was 65,000 fans whose collective impulse was hoping for the best and bracing for the worst. The game was following a script all too familiar. Their restraint was part of a communal defense mechanism passed down for generations through years of disappointment.

 

http://www.buffalone...two-bills-drive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Bucky never talked about the end of the game.

 

He was trying to construct an argument that EJ needed to implore the Bills fans to be louder at the end of the 3rd quarter.

 

The Bills were on offense when the 3rd quarter ended.

 

I'm not defending idiot fans who leave early when they should be contributing to crowd noise but you're wrong about Bucky.

no offense, but your wrong. It was far from the loudest I've ever heard that place.

 

Ill say it again, and in assuming that Bucky feels the same way, considering all the "New Hope" we have right now, and a 2nd half lead of the Pats, the stadium was very mild considering what it could/should have been.

 

The Pats comeback game a few years ago was deafeningly loud. This game was nothing compared to it. Not even close. It felt almost no different than a regularly hyped game.

 

 

This is just my opinion. I know what others here are saying. But as my experience in going to games since 2006, It really wasn't that loud.

 

My take on the crowd:

 

It was the home opener of a new regime. One would expect a very loud crowd.

 

Was the crowd noise above average? I would say yes.

 

Was it as loud as I was hoping/expecting? I would say no.

 

Am I ever satisfied with the level of crowd noise at the stadium? No (however I wasn't at the Dallas MNF game).

 

Does it bother me that I have to shame other Bills fans into making noise during key junctures of the game by turning around and encouraging them when I'm simultaneously shouting/screaming AND clapping my hands or banging on a loud object? Yes it bothers the crap out of me.

 

Has my voice yet recovered from Sunday's game? It was more or less back to normal by Thursday.

 

 

Do I believe that fans can affect the outcome of games if they can generate enough noise? Obviously yes.

 

Does it bother me when fans leave early when our opponent is driving down the field for a potential game-winning score? What do you think?

 

Do I think that a fanbase that is honored as "The 12th Man" on the stadium ring have a greater obligation to make as much noise as they can during certain times in a game? Yes.

 

Do I agree with Bucky Gleason? No. To criticize the crowd for not being loud enough for his liking at the end of the 3rd quarter is silly, IMO.

 

Moreover I don't think the "culture of losing" has/had anything to do with the crowd performance.

damn it. I agree with this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me boil it down to this:

 

I think that Gleason's theory that it's a "culture of failure" which causes the paid attendees to not cheer more loudly is baloney.

 

BTW, I hadn't read Promo's topic until a few minutes ago and didn't realize it's the same topic so I hadn't read many of the valid opinions stated in that topic which also apply to this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay close attention to Gleason's bolded interpretations of the crowd.

 

Gleason is saying that the crowd is expecting to lose and that is why we weren't as loud as he thought we should be.

 

That is the thesis of his article:

 

The most poignant moment during EJ Manuel’s debut Sunday didn’t come after his first touchdown pass or after his first loss. It emerged at the end of the third quarter, when the rookie quarterback walked toward the sideline with a 21-17 lead over the Patriots and pleaded with a subdued crowd to provide a boost.

 

Manuel spread his arms wide, with his palms turned toward the heavens, waving his hands and urging reluctant fans to get involved. It was as if he begged them to forget about the past and fight through their fears, to climb aboard and join him in a new era that would be better than those in recent years.

Bills fans politely obliged with shallow enthusiasm, the way they do when players plead for support or the Jumbotron tells them it’s time to cheer. A few moments later, they returned to their natural thought process of wondering when and how – not if – Buffalo would blow another one to New England.

“This is my first year here,” Manuel said the other day during his weekly news conference, “so I’m not used to losing.”

You couldn’t help but appreciate his youthful innocence, but he obviously hadn’t been around long enough to understand the thinking in this town. Manuel thought fans were quiet going into the fourth quarter because they were being respectful of the Bills’ offense, which was on the field.

Actually, what he saw was 65,000 fans whose collective impulse was hoping for the best and bracing for the worst. The game was following a script all too familiar. Their restraint was part of a communal defense mechanism passed down for generations through years of disappointment.

 

http://www.buffalone...two-bills-drive

the bolder parts are pretty much what I agree with here. It was great seeing EJ get into the game and pump up the crowd. And IMO it was nothing more than that. Pumping up the crowd, showing that he's pumped and excited.

 

Did I think it was to make it louder, giving the impression that we weren't loud enough? No, not really. We weren't the loudest I've ever heard the place, but we were plenty loud.

 

At the same time, do I feel like there is a huge disconnect between the fans and the gameplay? Yes. Do I feel like many of the fans in the stadium need reminders on the Jumbotron, or for players to flail their arms in the air to get loud? Absolutely. It disgusts me that we aren't, or can't be loud at the right times. People are stupid enough to stand up and cheer and get obnoxiously loud even when were in offense. At the same time, people don't start to get loud until the ball is almost snapped on defense. You know what makes a difference on defense? Being loud when the opposing team is in the huddle. Being loud when they take a time out and are in the sidelines. Being loud while setting up on the LOS. Waiting until the ball is snapped is useless. As anyone that's played a sport can tell you that while in the heat of the play/race/moment in the game, almost everything else disappears. I ran track for 4 years in high school. I couldn't remember a single thing that happened in the middle of a race. I blocked everything else out. I have no doubts that these players block out the crowd noise once the ball is snapped b

 

Let me boil it down to this:

 

I think that Gleason's theory that it's a "culture of failure" which causes the paid attendees to not cheer more loudly is baloney.

 

BTW, I hadn't read Promo's topic until a few minutes ago and didn't realize it's the same topic so I hadn't read many of the valid opinions stated in that topic which also apply to this one.

i can tell you that I was deflated when the Bills punted with just a few minutes left. I absolutely KNEW that the Pats would match down and win the game. I was officially done at that point. Did I leave? No. Did I stop being loud? No. But that's the kind of person I am. But to all the "between the 20s" fans that only go because they got free tickets from their work, I firmly believe they left early or stopped cheering because that's who they are.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^

 

You know, the times I'm quietest during a game is when we score.

 

Because I know the crowd doesn't need my "help" at this point and I'm satisfied to be happy within (and let my vocal chords recover).

 

As you know, I sat in the first row upper deck in the first half and at the 40 yard line in row 21 on the Bills sideline in the 2nd half.

 

In the upper deck there were a lot of younger fans who didn't seem to understand the game and when to make noise.

 

In the lower bowl, there were a bunch of older "tired" fans who wanted us to sit down so they could watch the game.

 

As I said upthread, I'm never satisfied with the crowd noise level at the stadium but I don't think it has anything to do with a "culture of losing" that's making the fans quieter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So Bucky can read minds and knew exactly what everyone was thinking?

if you didn't think they would or at least think they might blow it then I don't really know what to say. Sure it's a completely new regime, but with 13+ years of "blowing leads" how could you not think about it? I'm so tired of being worried even if its 3rd and 20 when were in defense it makes me sick.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...