Jump to content

New gun control thread!


Recommended Posts

Three year old shoot father in the ass with mother's gun. :lol:

 

Bullet exits father's ass and hits 8-month pregnant mother in the shoulder. :(

 

Father treated and released. Mother currently hospitalized and in stable condition. Status of the unborn child is unknown.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/01/new-mexico-toddler-shoots-pregnant-mother-father-police-say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three year old shoot father in the ass with mother's gun. :lol:

 

Bullet exits father's ass and hits 8-month pregnant mother in the shoulder. :(

 

Father treated and released. Mother currently hospitalized and in stable condition. Status of the unborn child is unknown.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/01/new-mexico-toddler-shoots-pregnant-mother-father-police-say

I'm guessing that if it hit Momma in the shoulder that there should be no physical issue for the child. Let's all pray that is the case. :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Whew, at least they aren't acting like MSNBC and the other MSM outlets. Darn that one-sided ol' Fox News Network anyway! I'll bet Rachael Maddow has a full 360° view of the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three year old shoot father in the ass with mother's gun. :lol:

 

Bullet exits father's ass and hits 8-month pregnant mother in the shoulder. :(

 

Father treated and released. Mother currently hospitalized and in stable condition. Status of the unborn child is unknown.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/01/new-mexico-toddler-shoots-pregnant-mother-father-police-say

 

 

Almost a triple Darwin award.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I thought progressives didn't care about unborn globs of greasy, grimey fetal guts.

 

Oh, wait. A gun was involved. Nevermind.

The status changes based on the whims of the woman carrying it. If the woman doesn't want it, it's nothing more than an unformed mass of cells with the potential for human life; however, if the woman want's it, it's an unborn child.

 

This status can also be in a constant state of flux, depending on if the woman changes her mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three year old shoot father in the ass with mother's gun. :lol:

 

Bullet exits father's ass and hits 8-month pregnant mother in the shoulder. :(

 

Father treated and released. Mother currently hospitalized and in stable condition. Status of the unborn child is unknown.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/01/new-mexico-toddler-shoots-pregnant-mother-father-police-say

Anyone else visualizing why the mother's shoulder was in line with the father's ass?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't live in Ney York, so your absurd laws aren't my problem. However, my state also has a law making "high-capacity magazines" illegal, which is just about the dumbest thing imaginable.

 

I'm only allowed to protect my family with ten shots, then we're obligated to surrender to those who wish to do us harm within our own home?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY_SAFE_Act

 

I see all this signs screaming bloody murder over safe act, then I looked at its provisions. Which part do you right wingers freak out the most over?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY_SAFE_Act

 

I'm not in NY either and the high capacity magazine rule is the same here in CA. What's the point of that? What does it accomplish? I guess it just makes the bad guys and us better at reloading? Also how do they define "assault weapons"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY_SAFE_Act

 

I see all this signs screaming bloody murder over safe act, then I looked at its provisions. Which part do you right wingers freak out the most over?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY_SAFE_Act

 

 

The fact that the entire thing is an infringement on my right to own the weapons that I decide I want.

 

And before you start with the whole they didn't know about ARs when they wrote it, they knew they wanted the people to be as equally armed as the government.

 

And yes I would love an RPG!!!!

 

They didn't know about satellite TV, cell phone cameras and the internet when they wrote the first amendment.

Edited by Gary M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is it wrong?

 

in·fringe
inˈfrinj/
verb
  1. actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
    "making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
    synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; More
    • act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
      "his legal rights were being infringed"
      synonyms: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; More
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

in·fringe
inˈfrinj/
verb
  1. actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
    "making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
    • act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
      "his legal rights were being infringed"
      synonyms: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; More

 

The Second Amendment, by itself, does not apply to the States, but rather to the Federal Government, which is why the Washington DC gun ban was ruled unConstitutional.

 

Combined with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states: " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.", you certainly have a case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...