major Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Just saw this article. Enjoy. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/322688/20120402/oj-simpson-innocent-son-committed-murders-private.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwmann2 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Not sure how credible that source is. There are reports that OJ essentially confessed years later to a friend after a night of drinking. He said everything would have been fine had she not opened the door with a knife in her hand. Anxious to see what comes of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTW2012 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 "Claims Private Investigator," who btw is trying to sell his new book. You left that out of the thread's title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I think it's the same guy - there's a 20-30 minute video someplace that he put out a few years ago that puts together a pretty strong case that the son did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 That's what my dad always thought, that it was the son, he thought the son wanted money and OJ said something like "man I like too but I got alimony and child support" so the son fixed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 The kid must have borrowed his Italian loafers too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Why did Orenthal have the cut on his left middle finger? Did he catch it on his zipper while playing pocket pool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 It is hard to find but look for the video, pretty compelling. No one is going to ever open the investigation again though. OJ is in jail (and would at least be convicted as an accomplice) and the police and DA Effed up, no way they would go back and look at it again. It is not in the best interests of the public or some crap like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zazie Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 whether he did it or not I am pretty ok with him being in jail, he seems a very dangersous guty to be running around free \ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Let it go people, just let it go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Just saw this article. Enjoy. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/322688/20120402/oj-simpson-innocent-son-committed-murders-private.htm Funnt thing ... that's was one of my conspiracy theories in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homey D. Clown Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I would be far happier for all families involved if this could be proved. Imagine what life must be like for an innocent person acquitted of murder, but seen as a monster, and guilty in everyone Else's eyes. This of course assumes OJ was in fact not guilty, which I think there's a strong possibility. Nothing could be worse to live your life ostracized for something you didn't do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I would be far happier for all families involved if this could be proved. Imagine what life must be like for an innocent person acquitted of murder, but seen as a monster, and guilty in everyone Else's eyes. This of course assumes OJ was in fact not guilty, which I think there's a strong possibility. Nothing could be worse to live your life ostracized for something you didn't do. If it's true, he's guilty of covering-it-up. And I think he'd still want to take the rap, for his son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbosrrgood Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Just saw this article. Enjoy. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/322688/20120402/oj-simpson-innocent-son-committed-murders-private.htm OJ is, and only ever will be, guilty of one thing....Being a bad A $$ Buffalo Bill... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I think it was OJ's son in the grassy knoll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiemonster Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I think it was OJ's son in the grassy knoll. One kniver our two...three...four? Was there anybody else in the School Book Depository? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Never NEVER Give-up Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Only OJ knows what's true. A very sad story of a Golden Boy who's life takes a nasty turn with those events in '94. If Jason had committed the double murder, it does explain quite a bit of OJ's behavior that horrific evening. Then the way the narcissistic Simpson conducted himself throughout the trial and afterwards - up to and including the bizzare Vegas armed robbery - perhaps extremely bitter about how everything turned out (becoming a pariah and thought-guilty of something he (maybe) didn't do). Now serving 33 yrs for armed robbery - I can't help but think that sentence is 2-3x what it would have been for anyone else. A little retribution for skating on Nicole & Ron's deaths? I always wondered . . . I wonder if/when OJ is eligible for parole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 So Al Cowlings was driving around the wrong guy?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Why did Orenthal have the cut on his left middle finger? Did he catch it on his zipper while playing pocket pool? Why do I have a cut on my thumb right now? Last I checked, I didn't kill anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 (edited) Why do I have a cut on my thumb right now? Last I checked, I didn't kill anyone. This sounds like a case for disjunctive syllogism... DC Tom is either (A) a murderer or (B) not a murderer The cut on his thumb is irrelevant due to the possibility of racism within the police department (i.e., not (A)) THEREFORE, DC Tom is (B) not a murderer (but he will kick your ass if you say dumb crap) Edited April 3, 2012 by gringo starr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkyMannn Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Now serving 33 yrs for armed robbery - I can't help but think that sentence is 2-3x what it would have been for anyone else. A little retribution for skating on Nicole & Ron's deaths? I always wondered . . . KARMA.................. Hey OJ, enjoy your stay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 This sounds like a case for disjunctive syllogism... DC Tom is either (A) a murderer or (B) not a murderer The cut on his thumb is irrelevant due to the possibility of racism within the police department (i.e., not (A)) THEREFORE, DC Tom is (B) not a murderer (but he will kick your ass if you say dumb crap) Doesn't matter, Tom is a middle age, white American male, so it's self defense. Now if he was a white hispanic...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 It makes you think because it's a plausible theory. Jason Simpson was 24 at the time, a big guy, skilled with knives, and prone to violence and aggression and not a big fan of stepmom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 (edited) I have always thought that it was entirely possible that Jason did it, and that OJ was there. I have yet to see anything that would make me believe that Jason could not have been there, although I haven't followed it close since it happened. And it was the only remotely plausible theory where OJ wasn't the killer and yet acted the way he did. I still think chances are that OJ did it, but it's certainly a reasonable chance that Jason did, and there are many clues that would make someone believe he did. Edited April 3, 2012 by Kelly the Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 OJ is, and only ever will be, guilty of one thing....Being a bad A $$ Buffalo Bill... Miami may have the oranges, but we've got The Juice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SelmonSmith6378 Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Isn;t it funny how we hear about this 17 years after the trial? Just OJ trying to regain his sparkly clean image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Isn;t it funny how we hear about this 17 years after the trial? Just OJ trying to regain his sparkly clean image. When the verdict was announced, I was putting gas in my car. You...were not even born yet. I owned a car. You didn't exist. I am very old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 When the verdict was announced, I was putting gas in my car. You...were not even born yet. I owned a car. You didn't exist. I am very old. We were having a 'guilty' or 'not guilty' office pool. There was about a 4:1 ratio for people guessing at 'guilty'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 We were having a 'guilty' or 'not guilty' office pool. There was about a 4:1 ratio for people guessing at 'guilty'. "Gulity...if not for the fact that the LAPD can't frame a guilty man." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Found the video - this is part 1 of 2 OJ guilty but not of murder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 "Gulity...if not for the fact that the LAPD can't frame a guilty man." Sure you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Well that explains why he couldnt find the true killer on all those golf courses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts