SectionC3

I have an affirmative right to vote. I don’t have an affirmative right to any of those other things. Same as the Bills game. Big difference. That is a special kind of crazy. How is stop the steal going?

Maybe identifying the actual problem would be a good start. Still waiting on the stop the steal clowns to prove their massive voter fraud.

You lose on the meds. The CDC and the AAP strongly disagree with you. Hoax. A fetus is not a child. And I have no right to go to a Bills game. But I have a right to vote. So that’s one reason why your ID point is misplaced.

I would try waking them. Might help your blood pressure and make you a little less angry,

Maybe you could try the bus.

Hoax. It’s based on the educational needs of children. Better to be in school than not. You now disagree for policy reasons, not on a legal basis or on legal bases. Which is fine. I strongly encourage your to write your state and local representatives with respect to this issue.

Freedom, in this instance, is education. It’s not the right to be free from any directive that you dislike. Think about it the next time you approach a traffic signal. Or, if you’re in New York State, thinks about it when your kids get the smallpox and polio vaccines as a condition of going to a public school. If you don’t like those rules, then call your Congressman. Maybe he or she will want to listen to you whine. One would think. But complaining about critical race theory or whatever this morning’s point of whining is about is another way to self-impose victimization.

Hoax. My kids have a right to go to school in New York State. If that means that they have to wear a cloth face covering so that schools stay open during a pandemic, so be it. I guess the difference is that you live in Florida and I live in a place that prioritizes public education. Kids under age 12 don’t have access to a vaccine yet. That’s the reason for the disparate treatment of indoor locations. Once all of the school-aged children and their pre-school aged siblings can be vaccinated, then I’m comfortable with removing the face covering requirement. Until then, STFU (not you, the loud complainers on this issue), quit whining, send the kids to school with the face covering, keep the schools open and businesses running (can’t have parents missing work because the kids are sick), and let’s get this over with.

Hoax. The mask rules protect children from, among other things, parents who believe COVID is a hoax, parents who believe the only measure of the danger of COVID is mortality, and parents who take greater issue with a cloth face covering than with the possibility that significant amounts of school time may be missed because of this novel, unique, significant, and highly transmissible virus. Mortality is not the only measure of impact. Once these kids are vaccinated, then I’m with you: face coverings are optional. Until then, gotta wear them to keep kids healthy and to keep schools open.

Typically the district prefers the mask rule to protect children from dumb parents.

That’s exactly what I would expect someone who is part of Antifa to say.

If Carl wants to pay the difference that’s fine. He used to maybe be important enough to possibly do something like this. Now he’s just a toxic nasty old guy who rails against the government while profiting from his haven’t mentioned contracts. Carl is small ball in the grand scheme of this deal.

Well played.

Gut punch! Hoax. It’s neither funny nor original. Pee Wee Herman took in the 80s the approach you copy now. Sad. If you do it again I suspect you may hear from Chairy and Cuba Gooding, Jr.

I’m stunned that this guy is sober. I can’t imagine what he came up with when he was on the crank.

Like the fantasy that HCQ is an effective treatment for COVID?

Apparently you are a student of neither medicine nor history.

JIm Jordan should spend more time reporting child sexual abuse and less time doing whatever it is that Jim Jordan does all day.

I saw this old guy walking around the village of Orchard Park from a distance the Saturday before a Bills NE game during the Rex years. We had our then-newborn in a stroller, and this old man then ducked into a port-o-potty at a construction site. Such places, of course, are disgusting, and we wondered why he couldn’t make it home and instead had to step into that Petri dish of germs and filth. So my wife and I resolved that, should we see this man during our wanderings, he wasn’t going to come anywhere near our daughter. We ended up bumping into him at the four corners. It was Marv. Very nice guy, and we wished him well. And no port-o-potty hands touched our daughter.

I haven’t been there in awhile, but they used to have photos up in the sub shop of guys who had stopped in. For the most part, as far as I can tell, these guys are left alone in Orchard Park. They’re normal, at least for the most part, like everyone else.

That's fair. Tax levy, tax rate, and taxes realized are different things. But the point remains: the tax cuts were a Trump goal, he has a significant "say" with respect to the budget, and he participated in knowingly reducing inflow without commensurately reducing outflow.

Nobody has been thrifty since Clinton. Technically it is. But whatever. The bigger point is that, like George W. Bush, Trump cut receivables but still spent like crazy. GWB had, to an extent, a good excuse - he had to fund a war in Afghanistan (but totally screwed up in Iraq). Trump didn’t.

With every post it becomes becomes clearer that the dictionary is an urgent need for you. It is critical that you do your best not to upset Santa and to stay off the naughty list. I wish I could at that you’re (proper usage) succeeding there, but that would be a hoax.

Looks like another HCQ overdose for “Doc.” I laughed out loud at this. For real. Well done!

Probably about 40 million or so, give or take.