SectionC3

And you accuse others of not being balanced.

Again, who cares? We're at the thought police stage here. People are getting fired for saying crass and horrible things. Seems like she wasn't supposed to do what she did, and her employer is making her pay the price for it. Such is life. This death seems to be more related to MAGA parents and some pretty crappy parenting than it is to anything to do with the Democratic Party. Of course, it's more related to a lunatic who, at this point, still appears to have acted alone. So save the "commie" nonsense for people who care.

Why is the title relevant? Why isn't it son of gun culture MAGA parents? Are the parents to blame for raising a child who could be so easily manipulated? Or was he just a bad kid? And perhaps should the parents have recognized that such a troubled youth should not be near firearms?

Should the people who celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder be fired from their jobs? If you believe the answer to that is yes, then I have a hard time understanding how this comment can be condoned. Looks like we have a lawyer in our midst here. What, exactly, is the law with respect to that issue? I don't know Brian Kilmeade, and I don't care for his comment. It's dumb. But aren't we getting to a thought police stage here? He said something stupid. He didn't act on it. As far as I know, it's an isolated thing for him. Honestly, who friggin cares. But it's an issue because there are many MAGA who are out to punish anyone who said something stupid, crass, and horrible about the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Always an excuse from you about misbehavior on the right wing. I’m not excusing any of the disgusting reaction to the Kirk assassination. Your selective outrage lead you to gloss over the (admittedly far less pervasive but still toxic) overreaction that seems to have come the modern right. Then why pardon all J6ers?

In turn you whitewash it. Both things can be wrong. Why can’t you just admit as much?

What about the calls to round up Democrats in the immediate aftermath of the murder?

Tony Romo back injury.

And it was a misplaced throw. Keon jumped when the ball flashed expecting it to be high. Proper ball placement there is a score,

This is ludicrous. Try explaining to a rational person how J6 was a day of love. Nobody is without sin here. Including those who whitewash J6.

Wrong. Project more. You're trying too hard to be a victim here. One person killed him. Who came from Mormon culture, gun culture, and a MAGA family, and who played too many video games. Nobody's saying that Mormons or gamers or crappy MAGA parents are at fault. Stop projecting.

Who killed him? I’m not itching to get rid of him. I’m itching for him to leave. There’s a subtle difference. But I’m also not itching for a health issue, etc., for the guy. The observation here is that he is not well. It’s not political in the least. Just look at the picture.

Anyone who is familiar with stroke or TIA knows the story painted by that face. He needs to get checked out. It's ugly. Unbothered.

I'll skip the Trump insult and refocus on the deteriorating economy, broken campaign promises, and failure to lead and unify. This country is a friggin mess. It's thirsting for a leader who can meet the moment and unify. What about that was satire? It looked like performative anger and typical gaslighting from this perspective.

Lemme see. Maybe three or four people--not including the instant murderer--have done such things in a party of tens of millions of people. Party leaders condemn and disavow such things. Party platform generally involves empathy and inclusion, as well as such things as gun safety. On the flip side, the party that now claims to be one of empathy, and kindness, and inclusion, actually and literally kicked out members who condemned the political violence of J6. That party also accuses the opposition party of acting accordingly based on the actions of a few rogues that may or may not be members. This party also apparently now does not believe that there are "good people on both sides." So you can keep on mischaracterizing and painting with a broad brush and spewing your nonsense, or we can all work together, tone it down, and find a solution. Honestly, who cares? Live and let live. You probably do a bunch of dumb stuff that I wouldn't do. I thought you were conservative. Leave these people alone.

It extends and is then retracted.

You should try reading the constitution. Its protections apply to people, not simply to citizens.

Not true. At this point it’s one whack job who murdered one person. If he wanted to attack the party he had a pretty good chance to do so at that gathering.

Who is they? And the constitution applies to people.

Nothing else about a continuing investigation. No APBs for coconspirators. No apparent assistance leaving or targeting. Not to say he couldn’t have had help, but appears to have acted alone at this point.

I won’t argue with you. I too would like to know where we stand on yesterday’s calls to round up Democrats. I wonder if we’ll hear calls to round up gamers, or Mormons, or gun. culturalists knowing what we know now. Probably not. Not that we should. Point is that all of those frothy people, as you noted, need to chill.

So where are you on yesterday’s calls to round up democrats?

Does it matter? He’s apparently a lone wolf. It’s not like the Mormons shot Kirk. There’s crazies on both sides and both fringes, and they’ve each done wrong. It’s gotta stop.

It’s hard to rationalize that with Clay Higgins today and trying to revoke visas for peaceful protestors,

It’s both. From the five minutes I spent looking into the guy, it seems he has some pretty difficult things to say about minorities. And his approach is schlock. Prove me wrong is bogus. How about proving himself right in the first instance without summarily awarding validity to himself. It seems like what is behind the gates is not very good.