SectionC3

What incentive do they have to give this guy a jersey anytime soon? None that I can see.

Here's another nugget, from a different source. He wasn't late for the meeting, he missed the meeting entirely.

I thought they pulled Hardman after his idiotic non fair catch. I didn't realize he was hurt. Just got back from the game. Actually, come to think of it, he had two of them today. I'm referring specifically to the second one.

Nope. The article was in the Buffalo News. One player was mentioned. One was not. And the one that wasn’t … a little digging would have revealed a national story.

They reported on the incident but didn’t identify the “other” player who was present. That’s as far as I’ll go.

There’s still a ton of stuff that gets swept under the rug. One is a stunner - someone who has a great rep is a total phony and I had to believe the BNews knows and hid it.

See Above.

I shared what I did because it’s fairly well common sense now. Davis is up. He plays the same position as Keon. He doesn’t play ST. No indication Shavers-a McD pet-is hurt. If someone can’t figure that they’re done with Keon based on that alone, then they aren’t very smart.

Like I’m gonna burn who told me this. I don’t blame you for asking, but give me a break. The thought is that Coleman is immature and can’t handle failure/disappointment. They don’t think it’s going to work for him here. So they’re done. Maybe he gets a jersey again, maybe he has to go back in and it’s a 180. And he probably will be here for the rest of the year out of necessity. But again, I was told they’re done.

Also he is an effort player. At this point, that alone is an improvement over Coleman. FYI, and this should come as no surprise, I heard earlier this week that they’re done with Coleman.

I don’t think that’s the only thing that you can’t stop thinking about, Anus Man.

No argument about the pit here. Adios to all of those guilty here.

He dropped the dime that would have probably at least got us to OT against KC. Took the whole game to set him up for that drop.

Having watched them both, no. Not that either is good.

He said he reads this message board and he thinks that the goofs like you and Anus Man are right that this is a big democratic hoax.

Took my rep to coffee. Shared a donut. He’s gonna vote no. I disagree with him. (But still respect him.)

Are they admission against interest, Anus Man?

This whole thing is sick. Just release the friggin files. Trump has become exactly what his followers voted against. Rich guy covering up abuse of little people.

This is not a political observation. It’s a practical one. I agree with what you said. And I fear that nobody in charge is smart or energetic enough to deal with the AI ripple that may well become a tidal wave. Trump and Biden both are long past prime. Harris would not have been all that much better. JD is, in my view, not a guy who’s gonna get elected for a variety of reasons. America is dying for someone young, normal, energetic, and thoughtful.

Apparently the theory is that a clunky offense with a mediocre defense will yield a different result. I suppose it will, because if this keeps up someone is getting fired.

I rather not trade him and get the defensive line right so there’s more assets in terms of draft capital and financial capital to dedicate to receiver. It’s harder to find Josh than it is to find the other things. And, if we’re successful in the Joe Brady system, then we probably end up paying someone like Brock Purdy $55 million anyways do the same nonsense that Josh is doing right now. I’d rather play to Josh‘s strength. But we simply don’t have the personnel to do that right now. It’s a huge indictment of Beane. Can’t find defensive lineman. Can’t find receivers. Can’t be here moving forward unless this gets fixed immediately.

If this is the plan then we’re better off having traded Josh, signed Dan Jones, and used the picks plus the $40m savings to boost the rest of the roster. And maybe designed the defense to be heavier. The strategy is not terrible, but it’s too inflexible, too overused, and doesn’t play to our strengths.

Another instance of mutual responsibility. Yes, under Biden, there were walkbacks and probably some periods of shutdown, but that's only part of the story. Similar approaches were taken under Trump, and it's reasonable to conclude that had Trump taken COVID seriously (no masks, no social responsibility, taking the vax, then hinting against it, following his Lysol idiocy and the friggin charade on the rotunda saluting a helicopter after he damn near died of the virus) then we would have had fewer restrictions later. Trump's inflation, frankly, is a continuation and an exacerbation of the Trump/Biden inflation that started in 2020 and that still has not been adequately addressed. Now, Trump is compounding the problem by suggesting more free money (something that's free, of course, has no value) following his tariff/tax hike on American consumers. All of the jive about "economic boom" and "increasing supply" isn't going anywhere when consumer confidence is in the pits. Add in AI job cuts, and an otherwise contracting job market, and problems are on the horizon. Meanwhile, the sycophants follow along with whatever crazy idea a guy who, if not in the public eye, probably would have issues keeping his driver's license comes up with. The whole thing is madness.

Hoax.

Where does it say "every" in the quote you provided? It doesn't. It also doesn't say "no." That's the point. If it wasn't an issue, then the answer would have been "no."