SectionC3

Hoax. I mostly agree. But socially conservative? I'm not so sure. At least not by the standards of 30 to 40 years ago.

Good luck to anyone trying to figure out NYC rent control laws. But I think the idea might be to make more units subject to rent control, which owners are obviously going to hate and which might provide more affordable, but often unimproved, housing. A fair point. With inflation and labor issues, nobody is going to want to develop fully rent controlled housing. The solution might lie in making some units subject to rent control in larger developments. But that requires one to understand the rent control laws, and good luck with that incomprehensible mess.

I agree on the swap. I just don’t want their crap currency, and the exchange accomplishes nothing for everyday Americans. I wasn’t aware of the mineral issue. That makes a little bit of sense if there’s value in those resources and if the swap secures those resources at fair value. The other piece looks a lot like an effort to influence the election. Trump is hardly alone in the annals of American history in that respect. This is just sort of a … much more brazen way of doing it.

Hoax.

Interesting. I always thought you were part of the rainbow coalition given the fact that you love “boys” enough to have it in your screen name. Maybe you still are and this is just more of your gibberish. Either way, you’re a weird and angry guy.

Typical MAGA lack of accountability.

This is rational and I agree with a lot of it. My view is that most people don’t care who lives who. But they also draw the line at a kid identifying as an animal or a furry or whatever. I appreciate that this is kind of a “Riley Gaines” point about a minute sliver of society that is largely inconsequential to the broader issues that face us. But it is a touchstone or lightning rod for a lot of people who want a higher floor for deviancy, and I don’t disagree that what you say is reflective of a fairly broad view. Like I said, woebegone loser.

Internet tough guy. For allegedly not caring what I think you sure spent a lot of time responding. I think the issue here is that you’re frustrated because, in the real world, you’re kind of a loser and nobody gives a whit about any opinion you may have. The world passed you by, you’re angry and you express it with your gratuitous nastiness.

I was thinking the same thing about you when I read all of the nasty stuff that you wrote.

I'm an open-minded guy but, objectively, I don't. I just don't get this one. It looks to me like Trump is playing favorites with a friendly leader. Their worthless pesos aren't going to help with SNAP/health care here.

20b to Argentina is a lot of scratch, especially right now.

What I meant by "source" is that the tweet is from a bozo who can't spell a fairly common term around here.

I took the bait and clicked the link. That guy is from Buffalo and can't properly spell "Sabres." Maybe he's right about what he posted. But this seems like a classic "consider the source" situation.

Dan Jones just picked up a ton of leverage.

39 played pretty well last night.

They didn’t run much joker until yesterday. And he looked ok in limited snaps. Had at least one pressure in Q4. Also might have the body type for it. Like anything else in life, it depends on the price. But the may give Solomon a shot there. He was in his seek and destroy role against them chiefs. His job is to trigger on Mahomes.

Hoecht in a/b gaps was a monster.

I was just thinking the same thing. But I wonder if Solomon might be better suited to the role.

No. Goal line at end of first half.

Apparently it means 20b for Argentina but nothing for Americans on SNAP.

What about the slaughter of Ukrainians? No luck with that one, apparently. I thought that was on the "to solve on Day One" list. Right next to inflation, if I recall correctly.

Anus Man strikes again. Antifa? Not a hoax. Twenty one million violent criminals? A precise number. Cats and dogs, eaten by the pound? Yessir. All gobbled up. But hungry kids? Way overcounted. Gotta be miserly there. I bet St. Peter loves all of this MAGA business about keeping the rich healthy, and the sick poor and hungry. Hoax.

This is why I'd like them to dangle a 1 for Addison or Waddle. I have it on good authority that they loved Addison. Same concept here as the first Diggs trade. Spend the premium asset on someone who is proven.

Is like button your new code for sphincter? I’m not familiar either your strange lingo.

Insults coming from a guy named Anus Man just don't hit the same.