SectionC3

I’m hopeful that we might get lucky here because I’d be surprised if they let him walk off the field if he failed the Lachlan test. MRI on Friday, no doubt.

Whomever decided to scratch moss and go with the tighter o-line splits gets a game ball. Less confusion on stunts/games in passing game and allowed breida to attack edges. It’s about time we went to that.

Peacock?

It’s not an indignation. And back read. I don’t like gluttons, either.

I did. You ignored it. I didn’t realize that writing an insurance policy so that policyholders and stakeholders benefit is authoritarian. Last I checked, that sounds like capitalism. Sounds like you might be on the wrong side of it. I’m sorry to hear that. Hoax. Actually, I don’t care and I hope someone jacks up your premiums so I don’t have to pay for your stupidity if you get sick.

I’m not a scientist, but I’ll hazard a guess. More human interaction (less “lockdowns”), mask fatigue or disuse, and an evolved virus that is more infectious but perhaps less lethal. Your point appears to be that more infections mean that the vax is ineffective. To my understanding, a vax isn’t going to prevent all spread; it should prevent some spread and make the spread that does occur less dangerous in those who are infected. Believe me, I am working on not working. Go stock market.

I know them pretty well. Let's not even get into how undermining NATO and palling around with Putin affects the "peace through strength" tenet of conservatism. Ding ding we have a winner. So get the vax and increase your odds of staying out of the hospital. Or pay for it yourself. Whatevs. Not my problem. Freedom at its finest. Have we accounted for transmission among the unvaccinated? Or asymptomatic presence in the vaccinated (which, BTW, is one of the purposes of the vax)? Nope. So another false equivalency--or, if you will, hoax--from you.

Hoax. The shot keeps hospitalizations down. Your own numbers say as much. If the shot didn't work, then hospitalizations would be 50/50 vexed and unvaxxed. They're not. Another hoax debunked.

Nope. What do conservatives stand for? Rule of law, free trade, individual liberty. What did Trump stand for? Tariffs, lies, and election law hoaxes. It's why people like Cheney--a longtime conservative--despise him.

57% of hospitalizations are unvaxxed, according to your numbers. 75% at ECMC are unvaxxed. Maybe you're a little unnerved by my good ideas here. Whatever. Wanna skip the shot? Cool. Time to pay for it. Conservatism is dead. Donald Trump destroyed it. Conservatives have no idea what they stand for or what their bedrock principles should be. I just have common sense. It's lacking these days.

Yup. I do. The vax cuts hospitalization rates. Stop spending my money on Medicare for the unvaxxed, commie.

I've thought it through. The hospitals will still take the patients. Then they'll sue the patients for unpaid bills and chase them down. Garnish their wages. Liens on Social Security. Push them into bankruptcy. Insurers will develop COVID riders for which adult unvaxxed can pay significant premiums. Not my problem. Capitalism. It's perfect. As to your other issues, those illegals bereft of insurance get the same treatment already. They get treated, and then they get sued if they stick around and can't pay their bills. Guy in the street? Same thing. If he has insurance that covers his GSW, good for him. If not, that's life. I'm fine with rewriting health insurance policies not to pay for someone like that so long as the shooting was a justified response to a criminal action. (Shooting someone for, say, public intoxication would not be a justified action.) Hoax. Nobody is outraged. And you painted with a broad brush. It's kind of like saying that everyone who believes that HCQ is an effective treatment for COVID is a drooling moron. Many of those people are drooling morons, but some probably are not.

Education doesn't work. We have too many stupid people here. A shocking indictment of our public education system. So now we have to hit them where it hurts. In their wallets. It's our freedom to do so, and I say that we exercise it. The fact that you might have to pay more for health insurance, or that your health insurance may not be as comprehensive as you would like, isn't tyrannical or exclusionary. It's capitalism--freedom--at its finest. Also, I note that nobody has disagreed with my plan to make the unvaxxed temporary bird/squirrel food. I appreciate the bipartisanship there.

There's no right to comprehensive health insurance in this country. You and I disagree there. Wanna do something dumb? Be prepared to pay for it. Just like smokers have higher life insurance premiums. In fact, maybe I just found the solution. Don't want a vax? Pay a higher premium. Let the actuaries sort it out. Done. Perfect solution. (For what it's worth, I feel the same way about the 300 pound slobs around here who live like gluttons and then expect me to pay for them when they have an inevitable stroke or heart attack. If they have money for Applebee's on a Tuesday night and whack down a half dozen beers and 20 wings every weekend night, then surely they can pay for their own Plavix. Jack up their premiums, too.)

Same way they get paid when they treat uninsureds for unavoidable or genetic conditions. Sue them, take a judgment, and have the judgment follow them around forever. No more buying guns and cigs and pickup trucks and Keystone Light and big TVs if you're an unvaxxed COVID patient. Gotta pay the hospital bills first. Nothing unethical about it. I just don't have to pay for their stupid anymore. It's a win for everyone. The nice thing about old people is that they typically chose to care for themselves and maintained their health. Unvaxxed COVID patients do the opposite. Freedom, baby. Cut them off.

Hoax. You didn't guarantee anything. You just said something on the Internet. Anyhow, I'm not sure that this is the place to compare 1099s or 8960s. But whatever. I'll accept your list. Maybe we can work together to identify some dumb things that neither of us wants to pay for.

Hoax. Masks + vaccines work to prevent spread and to keep hospitalization rates down. At ECMC 75% of hospitalization cases are unvaccinated patients. Maybe you want to cower in the face of COVID. I don't. I also don't want to pay for a more expensive COVID treatment for the fools who don't want to get a vaccine. The vax costs about $37/shot (purchase + transport + labor), and the Pfizer pill will cost about $529 for a full course of treatment. Hospitalization, of course, is much more expensive. And don't even get me started on paying for death costs associated with such morons. We shouldn't even put them in the cooler in the county morgue. Drag them outside and let the crows and squirrels have at it. I'd rather make them bird food than pay for electricity to store their COVID-invested bodies. That, my friends, is freedom of choice--my freedom to choose not to pay for someone lazy, brainwashed, or stupid when they get sick with an easily-preventable virus. I'm glad someone is doing something to protect that freedom.

Don't want to get a safe vaccine for COVID? Cool. Just make sure when you inevitably get COVID that you shelter in place, maybe even die in place, and don't increase my insurance premiums through your unnecessary hospitalization or waste my tax dollars treating or convalescing on government dime. (Not that any anti-vaxxers would, because of their firm stance against socialism. Hoax. They all would because they're morons who love their social security and medicaid but aren't smart enough to realize that such reallocations are--gasp--socialism.) It's about time someone has suggested something like this with respect to health insurance exclusions. Freedom and capitalism at their finest! https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/health/rising-covid-cases-and-mask-restrictions-bring-renewed-criticism-and-political-attacks-covid-mask-virus-health/71-d5912b74-e854-4e1e-a82b-f89b88190983

That happens right here in tidy Orchard Park. They nailed a Bills relative doing that about a month ago.

Two wrongs make a right. Makes perfect sense. Hoax. It’s stupid.

They have some options here. Kumerow is part of the COVID crew, which might make him ripe for a little vengeance from an obviously POed McD. And McKenzie’s carelessness should have been dealt with awhile ago. McKenzie is more useful than Kumerow at this point, so maybe Jake moves aside to make some space for Stevenson. Whatever. It’s time for a shakeup, and it almost doesn’t matter which screw up they dispose of. I’ll add this: I feel like Daboll has been setting up a deep shot to Kumerow in a “gotta have it” situation all year with this WR shuffling that invariably involves us either running or throwing horizontally when Kumerow and McKenzie come on the field together. So maybe that saves Jake for a bit. I don’t know. But one way to shake the malaise is with a roster move, and it’s time for a change. I vaguely recall carelessness is what got McKenzie cut in Denver. Two misadventures in the last two home games is not a good look for him.

Please. This is where common sense takes over. If one takes a very narrow view of the relevant law with respect to justification, then Rittenhouse is not guilty. That’s the verdict, and that’s the way it is. We all have to respect that. If, however, one takes a broader, more practical view of the law, then his case is much more difficult. Was it a good idea for a kid to take an assault rifle to a messy scene like Kenosha? Definitely not. And, did his presence and activity with that rifle make him the initial aggressor? Different issue. Maybe so. Not what the jury concluded, but a conclusion that many a reasonable mind could reach. No matter how one views the outcome of this case, we seem—as a society—to have checked our heads at the door if we somehow think it’s a good idea to have a heavily armed child, or any heavily armed person who is not on-duty law enforcement, roaming the scene of what was fairly characterizable as a riot. The result, which was totally unnecessary and could have been avoided if this kid, who had no business being there in the first place, had simply stayed home and kept to himself. Matt Gaetz is a Republican. FYI. So is the Don who, last I checked, hung with Epstein.

Really? What do dirty toenails have to do with anything? It’s an asinine comment. Disgusting. Not unusual. Typically the deal has an expiration date/time, an that expiration date/time almost never extends beyond jury selection.

I don’t take a position as to whether the game should be played. But casting this as a racial inequity, in my view, is absurd.

No. The Buffalo Bills have ruined my experience for the last month or so. And I neither gamble nor play fantasy football.