SectionC3

Typing with the spatula in your hand again, I see.

Hoax. I’m way better looking and in much better shape. Which I guess would make me fitter than the fittest President ever.

Seriously? That’s ridiculous. It’s fair to wonder if he’s a good interview based on the recent hiring history. I don’t agree with it, but I get it. But on a personal level … no way. Great guy.

Someone’s anonymous internet handle was mocked based on the dumb ideas posted under that handle. Sorry about that. Hoax. I’m not. Get over it.

How many people do you know who have cited fraudulently in states where there is no ID check? Rus Thompson doesn’t count.

Children committing voter fraud. Sick! Back in the 80s. For study. I think Donald trump was a Democrat back then, too. Or maybe he was fighting his own personal vietnam and trying not to get gonorrhea. So maybe you’re an ivermectin-chowing democrat. Talk about confused.

Whatevs. I didn’t picture you as the type to be hanging from the balcony of the senate on January 6. I guess I was wrong.

Here's how I see the issue. 1. Teams will play rope a dope against us moving forward. 2. We can't run the ball effectively, making it tedious or maybe even hard to move down long fields against Cover 2. 3. Our pass blocking is atrocious. 4. Hence will see Cover 2 with some press man beneath because the ball has to come out fast. 5. Even if we figure all of that out, our red zone efficiency is poor. 6. So even if we navigate long fields, we still have the problem of scoring touchdowns. 7. Bottom line, there's a lot of problems here. The Jax loss portends a much bigger issue. I feel the same way about four minute offenses. Tight game, bad weather, need to grind the clock? Forget about it with this group.

Or it was an attempted coup. Either one. hoax. you're lying about not using ivermectin. You take it all the time. We all know it. Largely because Joe Rogan thinks it's a good idea.

I'm with you 100% of the way. I'm out of answers. The OL is so bad that it's almost pointless to try to run. The backs (save for Brieda ) aren't fast enough to get to the edge. Singletary and Moss are dodging traffic in the backfield every time they get the ball on runs between the tackles. So what is he to do? Maybe mix in a draw here in there? Fine. Run on second and long? The guys on GR are killing him for it, but now perhaps we see why he runs the ball in an advantageous situation. I am not a Zack Moss fan, but there's a reason why Josh Allen has been our go-to short yardage back for way too long.

Yeah it’s bad when the IOL is getting walked back into Josh’s face such that he can’t step up and the ends get close while generally maintaining contain. Big issue.

I think josh made the diggs decision late in the fourth quarter. And I agree with it. It’s time to start dictating in that respect. and it’s time to figure out something at guard. If that means Bates goes at RT next week if Brown is still out, so be it. There’s no place for josh to step up, and it’s a huge issue.

The o line is killing us. It’s a wreck. I don’t like the fact that diggs is MIA this year and that wrinkles like the jet sweep and four wide have gone away. But it all starts up front.

No. Road loss to Tampa during the kelly years. This one was bad, though.

In truth I don't think the kid should be prosecuted or even reprimanded. He loves his dad, he tried to vote, he's 17 and maybe thought that a quirk in the law there allowed him to vote, and he couldn't. No big deal. The interesting part to me is that we have all of this hand wringing in the stop the steal crowd about law and order and voter fraud and press conferences about fraud that doesn't exist and nobody seems to bat an eye when something like this occurs. Does what this kid did mean that we need ID laws? Absolutely not; anyone with a little bit of knowledge in this area (basically, people other than Doc) knows that in states like New York this kid would have cast an affidavit ballot that later would have been rejected by the BOE during the bipartisan research and review process (for the obvious reason that the kid wasn't registered). But perhaps the whining about voter fraud and rigged elections shouldn't be a matter of convenience or party. Everyone who was whining about non-existent election fraud in Arizona and Georgia a few months ago should be jumping all over this story. But, as we know, that's not what has happened.

Says the guy who chows down on Ivermectin and HCQ. What you haven't said is interesting, too. Where is all of the fraud in "non-ID" states, such as New York? Your position is that voter ID laws prevent fraud. So one would think that you'd have evidence that, in a state such as New York where one need not present ID to cast a ballot that we would have at least one or two instances where a person signed a poll book in someone else's name, voted, and then the actual voter arrived to vote, only to be rejected because the third person had already signed the poll book and cast a ballot in the voter's name. And yet, we have no instances in which that has occurred. Which means the idea that we need voter ID laws to prevent massive Election Day fraud is nothing but a--you guessed it--hoax!

Give me a break. How many other people can you identify who have been so thwarted? And, in States where there are no such laws, how many instances of documented voter fraud do we have? I’m guessing it’s a number fairly close to your IQ. Low. So then the question becomes do we need the “fix” that you propose. The long lines in places like Georgia say no. They vote by affidavit ballot in New York state. Then the BOE determines the validity of the ballot.

I don't disagree that he did not commit fraud. But it seems like we had an attempt to commit fraud here, do we not?

You have it backwards. ID laws--the kind that you like--prevent votes. This is instance perhaps #32 of attempted voter fraud in a country where hundreds of millions, if not billions, of votes are cast every year. And where is all of this voter fraud in states without the ID laws you prefer? Turns out that it doesn't exist. Maybe he's persistent. Whatever. The point is if he thought wrong about whether he was entitled to vote his ignorance of the law does not excuse his actions.

Nope. I acknowledged that states have say in how they conduct their elections. If, for example, Georgia wants to engage in a modern-day act of Jim Crow legislation that is not inconsistent with the federal constitution, then it may do so. Whether I agree with that approach is a completely different question. And it does not mean that there is a "case" for voter ID laws everywhere, let alone anywhere. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.

I think he's vaxxed based on how he appears at press conferences. Fingers crossed.

Doubtful because he didn’t actually vote. But this sure looks like an attempt to commit voter fraud. So where is the outrage? Maybe roger stone should be on the next flight to Richmond. Unless, of course, stop the steal was just a hoax. In which case I understand the lack of hand wringing here. States’ rights! Especially in this state election!

Looks like it was skank n’ scumbag day somewhere.

I expect a lot of hand wringing from the stop the steal crowd about this today. Hoax. I don’t. But if they aren’t whiny deluded hypocrites, they’ll forcefully condemn this kid who loves and is proud of his dad. https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/glenn-youngkins-underage-son-tried-to-vote-in-virginia-governors-election-officials-say/2870695/

Post truth world. Wow. Great turn of phrase. Hoax. The platform is fealty to Donald Trump. Nothing more, nothing less. That party may still win elections, but it has lost its figurative soul.