SectionC3

Sounds like a Bobby Johnson issue. 17 has been our best short yardage back and that has to change.

I totally agree with this. But doesn’t this analysis ignore appreciation? COC is not a good measuring stick for an NFL franchise value. But mix the float in the value of the franchise in and all of a sudden it’s not so bad.

Overheard it on the PC feed as well. The band looks to be getting back together.

His agent has a lot of explaining to do.

Looks like he’s not “elite.”

I completely agree. The McKissic money alone isn’t too far from that figure. And, there’s still the Beasley cash.

That’s one of the reasons why Andre Holmes was released mid season a few years ago.

I’m generally with you. I don’t believe in wasting opportunity (eg cancelling a pick for, say, Stephon Gilmore by signing a bunch of JAGs). But the DT signings are not that. I’d much rather load up now for a super bowl run than worry about having an extra Marquez Stevenson or Tommy Doyle a year from now.

I really hope that the 2022 PR is not on the roster.

Bye bye beasley

Mine too. This may explain the team slow-rolling Shaw Lawson. Might not have room for him.

Hoax. Looks like you’ve been hitting the HCQ a bit too hard, too.

Zucker, right? Or is this the Ivermectin cooking your brain?

I initially thought that this place looked like a meth lab. Now, however, I realize that Meadows probably had a side gig cooking black market HCQ. Little surprise that he never slept there before committing voter fraud in 2020.

It all depends what the contract says. But typically costs are not equivalent to damages or to settlement proceeds. I haven’t seen the contract, so I can’t say. The way the NFL wants to use “costs,” however, is unusual.

One would think, but they also blew the "costs" issue. I'm not confident in anything that occurred here. And, it may have been such that the boilerplate language could not come in as a result of negotiation. Happens all the time in the construction context. Who knows. We could both be way off given how crazy thing thing is here. Are costs damages? Are funds dedicated to settlement damages? Or are they something else, e.g., compensatory payments, whatever. It all depends on how the contract is written. But costs typically doesn't mean damages, etc. It refers to things like office supplies, paper clips, travel expenses, and filling fees.

Whomever wrote that contract is in trouble. Indemnification agreements are construed against the drafter. I believe the key word is "costs." Does it mean legal fees, paperclips, etc.? Or does it mean settlement funds? To my understanding, that is the nature of the dispute.

The dude what are you doing moment to me in the afc divisional was waking away from Kelce before he caught the ball to put them in FG ran range. Maybe he did as he was told. I don’t know. But it was weird.

You’re talking about monitoring teachers with cameras. I don’t see how that affects pay scale. At least not in NYS. And, on top of that, I doubt that such monitoring is even permissible under many operative CBAs. Around here the number of observations permitted of a tenured teacher is limited by contract. Not sure how video monitoring would fit with those clauses.

I don’t totally agree with the idea that SIT necessarily has to increase to pay teachers. But the point that the money has to come from somewhere is totally right. To raise pay, we either make cuts to stay neutral or find new “revenue” from additional streams. Theoretically that would be growing the economic pie, but that doesn’t happen too much in a place like New York State. So jacking up SIT might be one way to do it.

I don’t feel weird about it. I’ve dabbled in the business here and there. It’s hard. I struggle with the idea that education is this hugely important and hugely expensive investment in our future, and we entice to it talent willing to work for, in many cases around here, a whopping $16/hour to start. I appreciate that the benefits are good, and that there is ample time off. But we might have much better luck getting really good talent if we paid a bit more. Now, if someone wants to say that it’s absurd that, in the Buffalo area, we have dozens of administrators who earn nearly as much as the governor, I will agree with them all day long. That aspect of the pay structure is outrageous. Duly noted. And stop thinking about me. It’s starting to get even weirder.

Hoax. There you go thinking about me again. I’ll take “who moved my cheese” for $200. It actually is kind of an interesting story. I would have like to have seen grandma’s reaction when confronted with the video of the heist. And I feel badly for you for having to deal with knuckleheads like that. Nobody who puts up with grandma litigating nonsense like that makes enough money.

Hoax. I don’t like clowns. They’re creepy. You spend way too much time thinking about me. It’s a little weird. I’d like to say I’m flattered, but … it’s just weird.

Hoax. I never said that. Teach within applicable curriculum guidelines? Yes. Criminal? No. If you feel like going to work with a camera on you as you itch your junk all day, go for it. I’m not part of big brother state, and monitoring teachers via video as they work (without, say, reasonable suspicion of criminality) is not appropriate. Hoax. Spend some time in city schools. By and large, those teachers are grossly underpaid for the nonsense with which they must deal every day. If you’re saying that many parents and students are not accountable, then I completely agree with you. It’s not just a city thing—it’s everywhere.

So you want local control, but not direct control? Maybe all of the concern about stranger danger is clouding your mind.