SectionC3

Moderates, too. Yes to \ 1. Possibly yes to 2, depending on the context and the charge. No to 3.

This is not very nice. I hope you have peace and happiness in your life. Although I doubt it if you're getting this angry and nasty with an Internet random. Maybe you're an incel. Or maybe you regret the fact that you didn't work harder earlier in life and now others have more than you, which you find frustrating. I don't know. But I hope you find some sort of peace and joy.

Hoax. That prosecutor has not failed to do his job. DeSantis suspended him prospectively of fear that the prosecutor might not do his job. DeSantis has a little problem with prematurity.

Hoax. We aren’t pals. Also, hoax as to the rest of your post. The Don is on the inaptly named truth platform. And, more importantly, we should let the facts play out to see if he has done such things as secrete nuclear secrets. Hoax. This would be much more believable if you said he stole the recipe for the secret sauce from the hamburgler.

Hoax. This isn’t nonsense. And it could have been avoided had Trump just, you know, not refused to return sensitive government secrets to the rightful owner of such things.

I’ve thought plenty about the insurrection. It is what it is. A failed coup. You guys spend way too much time obsessing over Hunter Biden and not nearly enough time worrying about the Trumpian threat to democracy.

Hoax. Whining about an armed raid, or whatever it is that this loser complained about, is a gross exaggeration that only inflames and that only catalyzes the very real threats that FBI agents and their families are dealing with.

Hoax. Unless you’ve read the instrument you cannot know that to be true. Yes. It occurred on January 6.

Maybe, maybe not. Depends what he does (or doesn’t do) when he’s there.

Hoax.

And they would B more if they voted for the Don in 2024.

I think so. Especially since Flynn will be “flynndicated” any day now. Hoax (as to the second sentence).

Good work!

You forgot the period. Try it this way: Hoax. Hoax. (TenHigh - that’s how it’s done.) Flynndicated.

That’s pretty sick, no doubt about it.

There’s typically a bunch of others on the ballot as well. But effectively it would provide a third sort of mainstream option - D, R, Liz Cheney (I’m discounting the commies, the socialists, the libertarians, the greens, etc., because they’re usually in the mix and their effect on outcomes is basically stable year over year). The idea is that Rs who aren’t inclined to vote for Trump but who will not vote for a D cast a protest vote for Cheney. Get enough protest votes—say, about 10,000 of them in Georgia, for example—and it might be enough to give the D a plurality in a given jurisdiction. It is a tried and true tactic. Not to say it always works. But it’s a reasonable approach to this type of election.

The first two paragraphs seem like a hoax. I can honestly say that I have spent nearly 30 seconds trying to decipher them and I’m lost. I actually agree with the first four sentences of the last paragraph. The free exchange of ideas is an American lodestar. Sure. As a ringer. And probably not in all 50 states. Looking for the Ralph Nader effect in Florida in 2000.

Really. I thought it was pretty nice, myself. Much more graceful than the Don’s concession speech after 2020. Stuff like this makes me think that you’re a fascist. Liz Cheney has ideas different from yours (which is wonderful, because you’re kind of sort of totally deluded), and therefore she’s mentally ill. Makes perfect sense. Hoax.

Hoax.

That’s what I’m talking about. We need a ringer to keep the Orange d-bag out of the way. Hopefully she can peel just enough votes to keep this scumbag in Mar a Lago or Club Fed or wherever he might be in two years. (I note the potential downside is that she brings an unexpected number of Democratic votes if the economy is in rough shape by then. But I’d take the risk.)

Happy to oblige. Try this one: Something that you have typed in the last 72 hours is a hoax. It may or may not be the post in question. Or it may be something else. Or it may be everything that you’ve typed, given your indulgence in and promulgation of fake news.

Hoax. If anyone has daddy issues, it appears to be Jr. Poor guy can’t get daddy’s attention or his approval. So sad. Although, if he was my kid, I’d be humiliated by his fake tough guy act, too. I’d probably ask him to change his name. Or maybe I’d change my name so I wouldn’t be associated with him. Whatever. Fortunately it’s not my problem. In the meantime, maybe Jr. can do shoot a hippo and see if that makes his old man proud, or maybe marginally less embarrassed of him.

Hoax.

Hoax.

Nicely put. And says it all.