SectionC3

And they would B more if they voted for the Don in 2024.

I think so. Especially since Flynn will be “flynndicated” any day now. Hoax (as to the second sentence).

Good work!

You forgot the period. Try it this way: Hoax. Hoax. (TenHigh - that’s how it’s done.) Flynndicated.

That’s pretty sick, no doubt about it.

There’s typically a bunch of others on the ballot as well. But effectively it would provide a third sort of mainstream option - D, R, Liz Cheney (I’m discounting the commies, the socialists, the libertarians, the greens, etc., because they’re usually in the mix and their effect on outcomes is basically stable year over year). The idea is that Rs who aren’t inclined to vote for Trump but who will not vote for a D cast a protest vote for Cheney. Get enough protest votes—say, about 10,000 of them in Georgia, for example—and it might be enough to give the D a plurality in a given jurisdiction. It is a tried and true tactic. Not to say it always works. But it’s a reasonable approach to this type of election.

The first two paragraphs seem like a hoax. I can honestly say that I have spent nearly 30 seconds trying to decipher them and I’m lost. I actually agree with the first four sentences of the last paragraph. The free exchange of ideas is an American lodestar. Sure. As a ringer. And probably not in all 50 states. Looking for the Ralph Nader effect in Florida in 2000.

Really. I thought it was pretty nice, myself. Much more graceful than the Don’s concession speech after 2020. Stuff like this makes me think that you’re a fascist. Liz Cheney has ideas different from yours (which is wonderful, because you’re kind of sort of totally deluded), and therefore she’s mentally ill. Makes perfect sense. Hoax.

Hoax.

That’s what I’m talking about. We need a ringer to keep the Orange d-bag out of the way. Hopefully she can peel just enough votes to keep this scumbag in Mar a Lago or Club Fed or wherever he might be in two years. (I note the potential downside is that she brings an unexpected number of Democratic votes if the economy is in rough shape by then. But I’d take the risk.)

Happy to oblige. Try this one: Something that you have typed in the last 72 hours is a hoax. It may or may not be the post in question. Or it may be something else. Or it may be everything that you’ve typed, given your indulgence in and promulgation of fake news.

Hoax. If anyone has daddy issues, it appears to be Jr. Poor guy can’t get daddy’s attention or his approval. So sad. Although, if he was my kid, I’d be humiliated by his fake tough guy act, too. I’d probably ask him to change his name. Or maybe I’d change my name so I wouldn’t be associated with him. Whatever. Fortunately it’s not my problem. In the meantime, maybe Jr. can do shoot a hippo and see if that makes his old man proud, or maybe marginally less embarrassed of him.

Hoax.

Hoax.

Nicely put. And says it all.

The most impressive part of 27 probably was the absorption of contact and the maintenance of his balance. He seemed a little quicker than last year on that scamper, too.

I think you're as wrong about this as you were about Flynndicated. There will be a second act to the career of American hero Liz Cheney.

They're both losers. I suppose Hunter can at least blame crack for his problems. I don't know what Don Jr.'s excuse is.

You guessed it. Hoax. It looks like when he's not busy shooting pandas (or whatever trophy animals he pointlessly slaughters), pondering Melania's unmentionables (sick), and spending more time talking about his "father" than The Sopranos' Jackie Jr., he's getting a little emotional about daddy and starting to attack the blue. I always thought this guy was a loser. Now it looks like he's a snowflake, too. Enjoy (or cringe, either one):

No. Hoax is a statement, not a question. Try this: Hoax. I'm glad I'm on your ignore list. You now have more time to ponder Flynndicated. My intention is to back the blue, particularly the FBI, because I don't like terrorists and I definitely don't like terror attacks in the United States of America. If you'd like to attack the blue, or defund the FBI, or worse, then there's not much that I can do about that.

Hoax.

I know you weren’t. I’m just encouraging all to use nice words here.

Yeah I’m with you. He doesn’t give an eff about anything but himself. Drudge has it right. The Don is trying to cut a deal, and that deal has nothing to do with the greater good.

This seems like a hoax but I have a hard time understanding what you’re saying. So I’ll call this a suspected hoax and leave it at that.

So far since my return I’ve avoided name-calling. A little civility goes a long way. We’re all friends here, and this is all for varying degrees of amusement and fun.