Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. You haven’t posted about HCQ in awhile, so the hoax per post ratio on this board has gone down a little bit lately.
  2. Lots of hoaxes here. Neither Hunter nor Don has been convicted of a relevant crime. Time May change that. Or people like you may try to defund the FBI to stymie the investigation of what appears to be this breach of national security. Sad. But not surprising, coming from MAGA.
  3. Hoax. Also, the two wrongs make a right theorem doesn’t apply past second grade. Unless you’re MAGA, I guess. We can’t rule it in or out at this point. But it wouldn’t shock me, for what it’s worth. Not to say I expect that outcome, but I wouldn’t be stunned if we learned later that he had executed such a transaction.
  4. Hoax. They’re not the ones excusing the misuse and misappropriation of our nation’s most sensitive secrets. And yet none of those people secreted them for an extended period in a place accessible to foreign agents. For awhile in a room without a lock. (Again, assuming the nuke codes were in the bundle of things Trump mishandled, which at this point seems to be the operative belief.)
  5. Amen, brother. Quintessential d-bags those two are. Neither would be good. But do we want adversaries (or allies, for that matter), knowing how we code nuclear launches? I would think not, lest these things have degrading intelligence classifications based on age and utility. And, hoax as to “the” national security issue. There can be more than one such issue with respect to these documents. Frankly, from what little we know about this mess, there are multiple such issues (the FPOTUS retaining these things, and somebody not getting them back quickly enough, for starters).
  6. Hoax. And you haven’t denied that you you want to defund the FBI. Back the blue, unless it’s the FBI, right?
  7. He’s slow AF and we have Morris his reps with the 2s last week.
  8. Yeah, they used him a lot on runs/screens last year. IIRC, he and McKenzie were a package for some of that. It was to the point that, every time Kumerow hit the field, I’d think it was a run. I also wondered wither Daboll was setting up a shot play all year with that package. I *think* we eventually took the shot, but didn’t complete the pass.
  9. That was witty. Hoax. Maybe you can remember how to lead by example. Seems like “they” will let anyone moderate these days.
  10. Sit tight. Let the investigation work itself out. And, the reality is, whether you want to admit it or not, Trump is a significant target in a pretty significant national security investigation undertaken by the FBI. Maybe you want to defund the FBI so that it can’t continue to protect our national security. I don’t. It’s just one of the many ways in which we’re different.
  11. If they cut him based on those savings (assuming your math is right, which I have no reason to doubt), then I wonder if he’s a toxic attitude that we don’t want near our locker room.
  12. It's not me that MAGA needs to worry about. It's the FBI. And it seems like Trump is in it pretty deep.
  13. Hopefully it's OJ Howard. I wonder if Beane packages the found money from the Ford trade to dispose of Howard's contract.
  14. He should get a job. He has a lot of people to repay. And I don’t want him eating free cheese or using Medicaid on my dime. Then again, taking from the government while complaining about the government is such a MAGA thing to do.
  15. Looks like Don Jr. took a break from shooting hippos and dropped the hint that Trump squirreled away *the* nuke codes at mar a lago. I hope it’s not true. Sincerely. Unbelievable.
  16. Pee Wee Herman would be proud of you. Maybe. Hearkening to the earliest whataboutism—I know you are, but what am I?—is just outstanding. Great job. Hoax.
  17. Hoax. Also, any feedback on your little name calling snit from a few days ago? I hope you start to lead by example. After you’re done with your important work of defunding the FBI, of course.
  18. Agreed. I think Hart is making the team. Seems like they’re going to ask the guards to move a little more this year. Glad Ford got his fresh start, and glad that we got something for him.
  19. Oddly, given their body types, Hodgins is better suited to Shakir’s slot role and Shakir is better than Hodgins outside. I keep thinking with Hodgins that a guy with that height and that relative lack of speed should be more physical. I feel like something’s missing. It may be the slot is the place for him. You made a great point.
  20. This is literally the first thing I thought of when I saw this thread. Well done. (Sorry, Ethan. The good news is that Buffalo is merely three hours away.)
  21. Also agree on Hodgins. He’s #7 right now. I tried to think yesterday of who he reminds me of. Maybe a more athletic David Nelson (somebody else made the same comparison in a different thread). I want to think he sticks, but I’m becoming more and more convinced that Kumerow has a firm grasp on #6 because of his special teams value and his ability to replace Davis in the “Bob Woods/Rams” blocking role. (We don’t do it as much as the Rams, but Davis gets his nose dirty from time to time). I don’t know if Hodgins offers that. Curious about your thoughts on Blackshear. The kid has juice for sure. I think he probably sneaks through to the PS, but I wonder if moving two years of Moss for four years of Blackshear (who can play a little ST, unlike Moss) begins to tempt them. If Blackshear gets some short yardage reps with the 2s next week then we may have an indication that they’re toying with the idea.
  22. I was at the game, so this may be off (the vantage point typically is not as good as it is on TV). But Tenuta, to me, is a marginal PS candidate at this point. He seems to me to lack strength. I’ve liked what I’ve seen from Andersen, and he might nip Tenuta for a PS spot.
  23. Define defund. And let me know which city or cities have spiraled into chaos.
  24. Hoax on all counts. Have fun defunding the FBI and weakening out national security. It's ironic that you're a moderator (and have an obligation to enforce rules), but politically support people who don't think the rules apply to them and who believe in destroying institutions that enforce rules that affect their dear leader. That, sir (and I use the term loosely, give your penchant for personal insults, which also is interesting given your role as a moderator), is pathetic. EDIT: You should self-report yourself both for your hoaxes and for your inappropriate conduct. Maybe when you're done defunding the FBI you could try to lead by example.
×
×
  • Create New...