Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I think it does, just not sure if they have the stomach for it. This draft was trash at QB, but early indications are that next year could be the opposite. Build up draft capital, finally accept a losing season and then your QB of the future that comes into a situation with a WR1 already in the building. That team is getting old in alot of places and, at some point, you can’t just keep running it back with QB retreads and compete for a Wild Card and inevitable beatdown at the hands of the Bills, Chiefs or Ravens in the Playoffs.
  3. I think Sal had good info this morning, Pittsburgh talked to Davis last year before he signed with Jax. also Brian daboll could swap Davis for Hyatt. both make a lot of sense
  4. Trading Pickens was probably the request of Rodgers.
  5. As a WR 4, that’s when he was at his best here, and even then, with his constant injuries, and miserable catch percentage, and getting intercepted with to much regularity…, ( because he wasn’t on the same page as his QB way to often) gotta “pass” on this,
  6. @BarleyNY I like the premise but need a bit more background. Is it target share; overall ability; what we think target share should be? Ill go with predicting target share using last years data as guide Shakir Kincaid Palmer Coleman Samuel Moore Knox I think Knox is pretty clearly the bottom and as you said Shakir pretty clearly the top. Kincaid was comfortably number 2 last year so have him retaining that. At 3 is where its super cloudy to me. Coleman was number 3 but I think Palmer takes all of Hollins targets and most of Coopers to be number 3 this year. People (@Kirby Jackson and @Nephilim17) who have Moore at number 3 are interesting to me. If Moore was so high up the list then why was he deprioritized this offseason? Also why is palmer, who they rushed to get a bigger contract, gonna get less targets (palmer seems a much higher priority)? So I have Samuel and Moore being very similar.
  7. Moving Watt means they're going for a full rebuild. The timing of a rebuild makes no sense considering they just signed DK and didn't draft a QB.
  8. So basically Davis will almost certainly play for the vet minimum this year. Houston owes him $11.5M guaranteed for 2025, but whatever his new team pays him Houston will be able to recoup from him because of offset language in the contract. So unless some team is paying him $12.5M or more which is obviously not happening, he has no incentive to play for more than the vet minimum. He's making the same money in 2025 either way. This makes me slightly more willing to bring him in if we want to keep 6 WRs and use Moore as our punt returner. Slightly.
  9. Trade them Bosa straight up...
  10. Interesting! Did he say why he thinks that?
  11. 🤔... is this sarcasm or bad math? My detector appears to need recalibrating. His last 2 seasons in Buffalo, 40% of his targets being picked would be result in 35 INTs a year due to Gabe alone, which I can definitely appreciate if being said sarcastically ... I could believe it if the actual stat was 40% of the INTs that Allen threw during those seasons were targeting Gabe and were due to miscommunication.
  12. that little interaction with the fans was not a good look personally I would pass. I think the guys we have now are better than him... he should have sent half that signing bonus to josh to begin with.
  13. Lots of speculation coming from Steelers land about the future of TJ Watt, given the Pickens trade. I can’t imagine Rodgers would be thrilled going there at this point, and if they don’t get him, (not saying he solves anything anyway) what exactly are they doing right now? Would be ironic for an impact DE to come available and it’s not Crosby, Garrett or Hendrickson. And it happens after we go hard on DL in the Draft. I think I’d stay away from this hypothetical though. Not sure how long Watt has left as an elite rusher, he’ll want a new contract and we just invested so heavily on the DL that I don’t even know what that looks like? Epenesa and a pick(s) for Watt + a massive contract for a guy with a potentially limited shelf life? Eh.
  14. I have been super into pretty much every playoff series. Some really wild games, especially over the last few days. Figured I would start a thread, in case others want to shoot the bull. i was hoping for a Cavs/OKC final, but Cavs are in a tough spot.
  15. okay one artist 2 covers. It likely won't be hard to tell which is which.IMO one sucks the other does not
  16. My guess is he ends up in Pittsburgh (hoping it's anywhere but here)
  17. I was at my skinniest and my strongest in high school.
  18. Don't let him enter the building
  19. Talking with some friends who are Steelers fans, and they couldn’t care less about losing pickens. i think it goes to show you that you can have all the talent in the world, and it’s just not worth it for a team to sign a guy who is also a total insane malcontent. We had a tiny taste of that with diggs (who is nowhere to the level of Pickens), and I have to say that the pros don’t really outweigh the cons.
  20. Agree. Let's not go back to that. He doesn't not fit into Brady's scheme. Plus, one of the main reasons Josh's INTs went down was because of Davis leaving.
  21. Yes, because we definitely want a guy with zero front office experience running the show. Again. It worked so well the first time.
  22. https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/topic/252247-the-gabe-davis-conversation-allen-with-and-without-gabe/
  23. Oh I agree Pickens has the making of a good to great WR. More upside than Moore for sure.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...