All Activity
- Past hour
-
@The Frankish Reich this seems logical to me, but I'm just a regular guy making his way through life. What say you?
-
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
Thurman#1 replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
There's plenty of true reporting. Maybe not a ton of deep reporting, but that's not really as much on the media as it is what people say and how often they talk. Investigative journalism? Yeah, not much, but there's not much of a way to do that in football. Reporters only get access at PCs, there are NFL rules about what can be reported and what can't. In every field public figures have learned how to keep reporters away. What are they gonna do? The science of public relations has taken over and public figures don't take risks or reveal much. This does indeed result in a lot of shallow stuff, boring stuff. The NFL doesn't seem to mind. -
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
NyQuil replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
A local reporter challenged me to a fight once when I told him the University of Buffalo wasn’t an official nickname for UB. Hamilton and Harrington were block machines the last time I was on twitter. -
Bills Score 3 TDs in 77 seconds. Sept. 30, 1990
Doc replied to Dan Darragh's topic in The Stadium Wall
That game was the light switch for me in going from casual fan to hardcore. -
Brandon Beane "might be the most sensitive GM in the entire NFL"?
BADOLBILZ replied to BADOLBILZ's topic in The Stadium Wall
It was common knowledge here at the time that the Panthers believed that. Do you really not recall that? The whole thing caught Bills fans and the Buffalo media by surprise. It wasn't a Buffalo generated narrative but pretty damn obvious, pretty damn quick in hindsight. You gotta' remember the context here was the Bills being Billsy. The idea that they would keep Whaley around for a year or two even if he didn't seem to mesh with McDermott was entirely plausible. That had been the case with the two prior HC's Whaley worked with. The sham McBeane pulled off was actually very clever. Get the intel you want from the scouts you trust. That was the only way they get the finished board and evaluations. Like I said.........the flaw was McD allowing KC to trade up for a QB in your spot. It's likely blocked them from reaching 2-4 SB's. -
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
JP51 replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
True story... I go from MSNBC, CNN,FOX, news nation everyday to piece together some remote semblance of truth. And yet I still feel misinformed... media are nothing but political spin doctors. -
Tough day for many but as Roundy has said ad nauseam, unfortunately, “follow scotus”.
-
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
Southern McButterpants. replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
Are you under 60? -
What Are You Most Excited About This Coming Season?
Gilberto replied to Victory Formation's topic in The Stadium Wall
After the last 5 incredibly fun and entertaining seasons, the only reasonable expectation now is to go to the superbowl. Anything less than that will be a letdown. I will still enjoy the regular season and all the drama; but let's be honest, the Bills are at a level where anything less than the SB is familiar territory. I am most excited about seeing how the draft class and offseason free agents improve the Defense. I am also interested in seeing the new offensive FA additions. I am somewhat indifferent about special teams. -
Why not FireChan2.0? The upgraded version. I thought Chans was an odd choice at first, but used to it now I nominate @muppy!!
-
Pegula Divests from Knight Hawks after pulling out of Rochester Lease
Doc replied to Mango's topic in The Stadium Wall
So after urging Terry to sign Rex and him turning into a disaster within two years… -
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
Fleezoid replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
Everyone is making great points. I think I'll start a podcast about it. -
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
RoyBatty is alive replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
I saw that interview, it was fantastic. Simple yet brilliant observations. -
The reparations discussion is a ploy to try and regain African American voters. Trump received more African American votes that any Republican in the last fifty years. The democrats know reparations are not feasible. How will they force 342 million people to take a DNA test? What about people who have both slave and slave holder DNA? What about American ancestors of the African tribal chiefs who sold their people into slavery to start with? Do we include reparations for ancestors of white slaves from the Barbary Coast from ancestors of slave holders from North Africa? Do we stop at American slavery, or do we include ancestors of Jewish people who endured the Holocaust? American ancestors of people subjugated by the Romans, Ottomans, Chinese, Egyptians, and Mayans? Where does it stop? Find me a person who didn't have an ancestor persecuted at some point in history, you're going to be looking awhile. The mere mention of reparations is a complete and utter scam to attempt to convince African Americans in poverty that there is a golden ticket waiting for them. Corey Booker is either a complete idiot or a total scumbag.
-
Mass media can dish it out, but can't take it?
SoCal Deek replied to kitchen sink's topic in The Stadium Wall
Everything in life is cause and effect. The reason media is the way the OP observed is that there’s very little true reporting or investigative journalism being done. That sort of thing takes lots of time and costs lots of money. What we have instead is people just spouting opinions or repeating other people’s opinions. With a plethora of outlets competing for attention each story burns red hot for a week and then the circus packs up and moves on to the next car accident. The only remaining question is whether it’ll reach such a critical mass that it completely folds in on itself and/or explodes in supernova. -
Supreme Court decisions.
The Frankish Reich replied to B-Man's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
What's good for the goose ... https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2018/12/18/a-look-at-the-low-key-texas-judge-who-tossed-obamacare-shows-a-history-of-notable-conservative-cases/ Both sides play the "choose a favorable district/get a national injunction" game. Democratic groups invented it; Republicans perfected it. It is a good decision in general, but the missing part is this: if individual judges can't issue nationwide injunctions, the Supreme Court is going to have to get a lot more efficient at reviewing policy changes quickly. Since we don't have that, the immediate outcome will be lawsuits on birthright citizenship in 90+ federal districts, no doubt with conflicting rulings. Born in north Texas to illegal immigrants? Not a citizen. Move west to NM? Bingo! Citizen. Unworkable. -
-
Pegula Divests from Knight Hawks after pulling out of Rochester Lease
SoCal Deek replied to Mango's topic in The Stadium Wall
Lots of companies pride themselves in having a flat management style. There’s probably way less that don’t. My point was that President is a legal/business/corporate term. Corporations are required to designate someone as the President. If memory serves, they’re also required to designate somebody as the Secretary. But the latter term doesn’t mean they’re supposed to bring the President coffee. 😉 - Today
-
Politics aside, this ruling is logical. I am not sure how it makes sense for someone at a lower level to be able to have enough power to universally override the higher-ups ruling at will if they do not like it. We can't do that to our managers and supervisors at work and Josh Allen couldn't override Beane and McDermott on a free agent signing after it has been done. They should still have a complaint or appeal process, but now it is more balanced so that judges on either side can't use frivolous stall tactics in the name of partisan politics..