All Activity

I remember when I feared losing Gabe Davis to free agency because the FO might try to prioritize re-signing Tremaine Edmunds. Fun times.

How about for a 16 TD RB, who added 2 more in the playoffs.

I remember back in like 99 or 2000 I had a friend who had some people in his family who were like half a wiseguy ish and they had this guy that would take the old directv access cards and program them so that everything worked! From HBO to Local channels all over the country to Corn with a P to Sunday ticket...etc. 50 bucks and the deal was when Directv sent out the signal to zap the cards he would redo it up to two times...after that you had to pay 50 bucks for a new one! mine worked for like a month and a half then got zapped, then never worked again. that is what all the chinese all channels all the time devices remind me of. I have a friend who uses one and gets every channel. Amazing that it works.

In the 60’s, 70’s and into the 80’s Buffalo wasn’t concerned about preservation, lots of great buildings disappeared. But we knew a 6-pack would get us through a snowstorm.

Black smoke signals no pope named in today's first conclave ballots Black smoke billowed from the chimney of Rome's Sistine Chapel on Thursday, indicating the 133 elector cardinals locked inside still had not reached a decision on a successor to Pope Francis in early votes on the second day of the conclave. ∎ The cardinals spent the morning shut off from the world, inside the historic chapel adorned with frescoes from Michelangelo and other Renaissance artists. They prayed for guidance and conducted two secretive votes, trying to determine new leadership for the world's 1.4 billion Roman Catholics. ∎ The electors returned to their living quarters, Casa Santa Marta, for lunch and were scheduled to reconvene late Thursday afternoon, when two more votes are allowed. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2025/05/08/conclave-vote-new-pope-live-updates-thursday/83494145007/

Such a good, rational, fact based point---you are very consistent in the quality, no matter the post on this topic. Each post just as rational and fact based as the next. But some may not feel the same as you and me. They would say that Beane kept focusing on the O line until it is now, by almost all standards, one of the best in the NFL, a cornerstone of the team. Excellent in both their run and pass blocking, blah blah blah. And these yahoos would also throw out some more nonsense, saying that Beane made sure the Bills had one of the best, if not the best top 3 running backs in the league, all also very capable pass catchers. And then they, comically, would point out that last year the Bills had the best offense they have ever had, scored more points in than any team in the NFL, were the first team ever to run for 30 and pass for 30 touchdowns in a season, had one of the highest points per drive this century, scored 30 points 8 games in a row-- and other inconsequential frivolous facts like that to reject your wise words out of hand, mock them even, with some even considering them flat out dumb. Then they will end their stupid argument by adding, oh yeah, and Beane hates him so much that Josh Allen just happened to win the MVP last year too, with those 'awful' receivers he gave him to work with. Those posters think that facts and concrete details are capable of replacing raw unsupported emotion and anger. They are clueless, obviously. Who wouldn't want a team run the way you are implying? It would likely mean an amazing turn around for the Bills.

i mean...this has to be the one.

I bet you used the caveat "consequence" to ensure even if something does change you can claim its not of "consequence"

Uk is like ….”What are you announcing exactly?” dt ….what a freaking loser

The answer to WR is a WR that as soon as he left, Josh won MVP

He zigs when he should zag.

Like I said, he does nothing to IMPROVE the team.

Im not arguing against bringing him in…Ive said since my first post I am good bringing him back, I only don’t like him as a starter to depend on, but depth I’m good with it. What I am saying is it makes little sense for Gabe, really no sense, if he’s got opportunities to be WR2/3 elsewhere because he’s not going to get much action here to reset his career and look for a next contract. Not to mention, any contract he gets here is also going to be much smaller and probably just 1 year. So as I said before, it feels unlikely for the main reason that we don’t have a consistent role for him here unless someone gets hurt. And at this stage of his career I would think he’s more focused on re-establishing himself again as more than just a depth player. Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s what I would think would in the best interest of his career and future earnings. But if his market is cold, teams aren’t offering much better of an opportunity, then sure I can see coming back here being more attractive especially to try and get a ring (although Bills still have to be interested too). I just expect several teams to be interested that offer him a bigger chance to compete for a lot more targets.

I'd be surprised (shocked even) if Tre doesn't get burnt and torched at least 2-3 times this season. Like, wide open TD burnt.

The issue become if it's coin-toss/shrug, what savings do we get by taking him? Even if he signs for a vet minimum, we're still on the hook for Samuel, Moore and Palmer if they're cut. Unless we can trade Samuel, I just don't see it happening.

Then the entire room stinks…

I'm hoping Terrel Bernard - He missed a lot of tackles, wasn't stellar when he had to cover, and was graded in the bottom 10% of LB's.

I am in the been there done that crowd... did not like his last year here in terms of being that true 2... maybe because he was injured... Bills didnt think he warranted that money... Jags did... off he goes... did not see anything last year with Jags to make me think his last year with the Bills was an aberration... maybe because he was injured... I just don't see how revisiting Gabe changes what I have seen in the past two years... that said... they bring him back on a Super low prove it deal to compete... almost like they did Tre... I am certainly not going to complain... I am nostalgic to a fault... just a fault of mine... maybe he works out maybe he doesnt.. but the thought of committing even solid money to him as a player... I am not sure you get the juice out of that squeeze, I would look to deploy that cash capital elsewhere because I dont think he changes you WR room a ton... he certainly isnt the speedster I think he is more in the Shakir mold... maybe with a bit of Coleman down field with contested catches... Bottom line I am not rooting for this... but for the right money sure give him a kick at it and see what happens... but I wouldnt wrap up guaranteed money... so, I think this means if you do get him he will test the market a bit and if he is not getting bites he may be back..

Gabe Davis just stinks. Adding him does nothing to improve this team. I don't care how inexpensive he would be.

Let’s list the pros and cons of a new thread in a new thread

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/west-virginia-coal-miners-lose-black-lung-screenings-trump-slashes-worker-safety-agency-niosh/ Trump cares so much about the American worker, you guys. I’m so glad our AI data centers will be coal powered!!!

This whole thing reminds me of the first Captain America movie where skinny Steve jumps on the dummy grenade and afterwards Tommy Lee Jones' character says, "He's still skinny." That'll be OP after Kincaid catches a game winning TD this season.

I bet you nothing of consequence changes.

Is he not already the richest person in the world?