VABills Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Keep digging. 448479[/snapback] Your comment that 13 points sucked, nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I guess it's probably not a good idea to comment about those who care vs. those poking the pig. 448468[/snapback] Not sure if I want to know about you poking some pig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greybeard Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Thank God it was a night game. With the magnifying glass Bledsoe is under he would probably burn up if the sun was out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper13 Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 2 for 7 on two potential game winning drives including a 2 yard pass on 4th & 4. Other than one big play- the 70 yard flea flicker, Bledsoe was crap. All short dump passes for 3-4 yards. He is the same as he was in Buffalo. Dallas can have him. They will go nowhere with him just like the Bills did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Not sure if I want to know about you poking some pig 448511[/snapback] Never poked a pig and never will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Anyway, here goes with the "hate" starting lineup: 1) Rico, aka "Rico Henderson" 2) ajzepp 3) eball 4) Pete 5) Alaska Darin 6) Joe Six Pack 7) Promo the Robot 8) mead107 9) obie wan DH) Gavin bench warmer: cablelady Perhaps we can convince ajzepp to persuade LanaK5 to be one of our coaches! PS: My apologies are extended to anyone who doesn't see this as a lame attempt at humor. This is NOT personal....just having fun. 447632[/snapback] I am offended that I am not in the lineup. I have been accused of beating a dead horse many times. Doesn't that count for something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Your comment that 13 points sucked, nuff said. 448486[/snapback] 13 points sucks when your opponent scores 14 or more. It's fine when they score 12 or less. This is another of those concepts you seem to have a hard time with. DDC baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Thank God it was a night game. With the magnifying glass Bledsoe is under he would probably burn up if the sun was out. 448514[/snapback] What's that I hear in the background?? Sounds like....violins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I am offended that I am not in the lineup. I have been accused of beating a dead horse many times. Doesn't that count for something? 448527[/snapback] You and I can do the Julio Franco/Adam LaRoche thing....we need you in the lineup! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 13 points sucks when your opponent scores 14 or more. It's fine when they score 12 or less. This is another of those concepts you seem to have a hard time with. DDC baby! 448546[/snapback] I see so if the Cowboys lose 90-89, and Drew goes 50-50 and 600 yards with 10 TD's, 0 Int's, 0 fumbles, and no sacks. He still sucks because he didn't score more then the other team. Gotha, I thought this was a team game, and kickers had to make chip shots and receivers had to go to the yardage markers. I didn't understand you logic, but I think I do now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I see so if the Cowboys lose 90-89, and Drew goes 50-50 and 600 yards with 10 TD's, 0 Int's, 0 fumbles, and no sacks. He still sucks because he didn't score more then the other team. Gotha, I thought this was a team game, and kickers had to make chip shots and receivers had to go to the yardage markers. I didn't understand you logic, but I think I do now. 448598[/snapback] All I know is I figured it would be a low score one point game, whoever won and I nailed 27 points. Gotha's, by the way, were World War One German bombers. I obviously know more than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 All I know is I figured it would be a low score one point game, whoever won and I nailed 27 points. Gotha's, by the way, were World War One German bombers. I obviously know more than you. 448631[/snapback] Umm.. no doubt. Never said I know everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Umm.. no doubt. Never said I know everything. 448637[/snapback] too many facts for you to argue with my point about drew vs peyton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Umm.. no doubt. Never said I know everything. 448637[/snapback] Hmmm...but you're always right... What's with all this high road crap, it's not like you. I'm worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 too many facts for you to argue with my point about drew vs peyton? 448643[/snapback] No I ignore your crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Hmmm...but you're always right... What's with all this high road crap, it's not like you. I'm worried. 448644[/snapback] No there are several people around here whose opinion I respect on various subjects. Some more then others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I am offended that I am not in the lineup. I have been accused of beating a dead horse many times. Doesn't that count for something? 448527[/snapback] Definitely a watered-down line-up. You surely belong, along with Spiked and Foxboro Mike. And if I'm leading off, I'd rather be Rico Campaneris... except my bat wouldn't fly over his head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I see so if the Cowboys lose 90-89, and Drew goes 50-50 and 600 yards with 10 TD's, 0 Int's, 0 fumbles, and no sacks. He still sucks because he didn't score more then the other team. Gotha, I thought this was a team game, and kickers had to make chip shots and receivers had to go to the yardage markers. I didn't understand you logic, but I think I do now. I don't recall anyone bashing Drew for the Bills losing that shootout in 2002 with the Raiders. However scoring only 13 points will usually NOT be enough to win a game. Drew had chances to add to that, but couldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Definitely a watered-down line-up. You surely belong, along with Spiked and Foxboro Mike. And if I'm leading off, I'd rather be Rico Campaneris... except my bat wouldn't fly over his head. 448671[/snapback] Thanks for your support. I knew I could count on you. I wonder who the opposing lineup should consist of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Thanks for your support. I knew I could count on you. I wonder who the opposing lineup should consist of? 448687[/snapback] You'd have to start with the Dead Horse Beaters Club, 7000 Posts in Six Months, and a few other psuedonyms. How je jeune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 No I ignore your crap. 448655[/snapback] I'm honored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 21, 2005 Author Share Posted September 21, 2005 Unbeleivable. New boatloads of excuses for Drew from the enablers. This year he has the line, the hall of fame coach, WRs, a stud RB and a great TE. Its deja vu all over again. Drew squanders field position, cannot put together a sustained drive, cannot put the ball in the endzone(besides a fleaflicker), cannot get a first down when it counts, and does his usual choke on MNF. Its the defenses fault that Drew could not put the game away and get a first down. Parcells playcalling was put on Drews shoulders and Drew fugged up the two drives which mattered. A couple of first downs and the game is over 13-0. I am sure Jerry Jones and Parcells take solace that Drew had a 90 rating. It supercedes the fact that he could only put up 13 points and could not put the game away with first downs. Drew had nothing to do with the Cowboys losing. Nothing- its all the defenses fault. And the cheerleaders fault. And the gatorade boys fault. Drew is absolved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Unbeleivable. New boatloads of excuses for Drew from the enablers. This year he has the line, the hall of fame coach, WRs, a stud RB and a great TE. Its deja vu all over again. Drew squanders field position, cannot put together a sustained drive, cannot put the ball in the endzone(besides a fleaflicker), cannot get a first down when it counts, and does his usual choke on MNF. Its the defenses fault that Drew could not put the game away and get a first down. Parcells playcalling was put on Drews shoulders and Drew fugged up the two drives which mattered. A couple of first downs and the game is over 13-0. I am sure Jerry Jones and Parcells take solace that Drew had a 90 rating. It supercedes the fact that he could only put up 13 points and could not put the game away with first downs. Drew had nothing to do with the Cowboys losing. Nothing- its all the defenses fault. And the cheerleaders fault. And the gatorade boys fault. Drew is absolved. 448809[/snapback] It is high...it is far....it is GONE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I am offended that I am not in the lineup. I have been accused of beating a dead horse many times. Doesn't that count for something? 448527[/snapback] You can be the closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Unbeleivable. New boatloads of excuses for Drew from the enablers. This year he has the line, the hall of fame coach, WRs, a stud RB and a great TE. Its deja vu all over again. Drew squanders field position, cannot put together a sustained drive, cannot put the ball in the endzone(besides a fleaflicker), cannot get a first down when it counts, and does his usual choke on MNF. Its the defenses fault that Drew could not put the game away and get a first down. Parcells playcalling was put on Drews shoulders and Drew fugged up the two drives which mattered. A couple of first downs and the game is over 13-0. I am sure Jerry Jones and Parcells take solace that Drew had a 90 rating. It supercedes the fact that he could only put up 13 points and could not put the game away with first downs. Drew had nothing to do with the Cowboys losing. Nothing- its all the defenses fault. And the cheerleaders fault. And the gatorade boys fault. Drew is absolved. 448809[/snapback] thx pete. i didn't even have to slide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 The Dallas defense collapsed? They gave up 14 points. You give up 14 points, you should win. 448284[/snapback] It's called a collapse when they do it in less than two minutes at the end of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Unbeleivable. New boatloads of excuses for Drew from the enablers. This year he has the line, the hall of fame coach, WRs, a stud RB and a great TE. Its deja vu all over again. Drew squanders field position, cannot put together a sustained drive, cannot put the ball in the endzone(besides a fleaflicker), cannot get a first down when it counts, and does his usual choke on MNF. Its the defenses fault that Drew could not put the game away and get a first down. Parcells playcalling was put on Drews shoulders and Drew fugged up the two drives which mattered. A couple of first downs and the game is over 13-0. I am sure Jerry Jones and Parcells take solace that Drew had a 90 rating. It supercedes the fact that he could only put up 13 points and could not put the game away with first downs. Drew had nothing to do with the Cowboys losing. Nothing- its all the defenses fault. And the cheerleaders fault. And the gatorade boys fault. Drew is absolved. 448809[/snapback] How many td throws does JP have for the year? How many does Drew? He threw for a friggen first down at the end of the game and it was called back because of Adams' penalty. He threw for another first down that would have been a first down had the receiver run the correct route. The fact of the matter is that Drew is playing much better than JP at this point. The hate for Drew on this board is uncalled for and inexplicable. Although I think that the Bills gave control of the offense to JP a year or so too soon, I am rooting for him to be a succesful QB this year. I really hope that he can pull it together and use this last game as a learning experience. He is going to have the opportunity to prove himself and succeed this year. Opposing teams are going to follow the Bucs blue print of crowding the line of scrimmage to defend against Willis and dare the Bills to pass. The opportunity is going to be there for JP to have a big game. I hope he does. He seems like a good guy and has the ability. We shall see whether the Bills made him the starting QB too soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Is anyone else confused by this whole peter-pete debate? I keep forgetting which one is the drew apologsit and which one isnt. could you guys please post it in your sig or under your name? thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveRalph Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 The fact of the matter is that Drew is playing much better than JP at this point. The hate for Drew on this board is uncalled for and inexplicable. We shall see whether the Bills made him the starting QB too soon. 449195[/snapback] The horse ain't movin, but I'm gonna keep swingin at him: JP may or may not be the answer in Buffalo, we don't know yet...BUT, Drewbie WAS NOT the answer! This much we do know!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 The horse ain't movin, but I'm gonna keep swingin at him: JP may or may not be the answer in Buffalo, we don't know yet...BUT, Drewbie WAS NOT the answer! This much we do know!!! 449201[/snapback] There is part of me that thinks that the Bills did Drew a huge favor. We just have not had the kind of line that we need to win championships. Our line pales in comparison to our championship years. Unfortunately, the Dallas line is not much better. Drew does have a much better coach who knows how to use his talents. I also think that there are a lot of Bills fans that blame the QB for absolutely everything. Because of that, Drew got a disproportionate amount of the blame and continues to get lambasted by the haters club on this board even when he is the NFC offensive player of the week. That in itself shows you the level of illogical hatred that some people have on this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 He threw for another first down that would have been a first down had the receiver run the correct route. 449195[/snapback] that comment is priceless. i may need to file it away for future use. i think last year the bills won a couple of games that they would have won if they didn't lose. (bill, looks like i'm at bat again....i'm thinking that was maybe a bunt single?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveRalph Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 continues to get lambasted by the haters club on this board even when he is the NFC offensive player of the week. . 449209[/snapback] That's great. Nice week. The problem is, that's not Drew. Drew played Monday night against Washington. The Week 1 guy was a function of Drew who can appear MAYBE 3 times a season. It's sad to watch his incompetence after 12 years in the league. If he was smart he would have signed with Arizona so he could play those NFC West teams that he was so "great" against last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 that comment is priceless. i may need to file it away for future use. i think last year the bills won a couple of games that they would have won if they didn't lose. (bill, looks like i'm at bat again....i'm thinking that was maybe a bunt single?) 449215[/snapback] I think that I will stick to taking John Madden's word for it rather than yours. The guy was supposed to run a route beyond the first down marker. Period. As Madden said, not only are you supposed to do it on third down, you damn well better do it on fourth down. Your response(s) is/are priceless given its/their myopic focus on blasting all things Drew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shameless Homer Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I think that I will stick to taking John Madden's word for it rather than yours. The guy was supposed to run a route beyond the first down marker. Period. As Madden said, not only are you supposed to do it on third down, you damn well better do it on fourth down. Your response(s) is/are priceless given its/their myopic focus on blasting all things Drew. 449231[/snapback] When you're up against the chief Drew haters and their team of sicko-phants don't expect reasonable responses. Expect a litany of one up insults and self congratulatory drivel. Drew can win it all this year and JP can tank, but in the end he " wasn't the answer". It's frankly laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 When you're up against the chief Drew haters and their team of sicko-phantsdon't expect reasonable responses. Expect a litany of one up insults and self congratulatory drivel. Drew can win it all this year and JP can tank, but in the end he " wasn't the answer". It's frankly laughable. 449255[/snapback] You are absolutely correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Drew can win it all this year and JP can tank, but in the end he " wasn't the answer". It's frankly laughable. 449255[/snapback] shameless, are you really stephen a. smith? if so, please type in all caps so we can imagine you screaming at the computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveRalph Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Drew can win it all this year and JP can tank, but in the end he " wasn't the answer". It's frankly laughable. 449255[/snapback] The first team that cut Drew has won it all three times in four years, including going 0-2 with Drew before inserting a 6th round pick to win their first title. And remember the QB controversy the week before the S.B.? Drew came in and threw a TD in the AFC title game when Brady got hurt. They went with Brady in the Super Bowl.....hmmmmm..... And FYI, I didn't say JP was the answer, I said we didn't know yet. Maybe in 2-3 years we will find out. But we DO know that Drew IS NOT the answer. Drew getting picked by the Burger King is "frankly laughable." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I think that I will stick to taking John Madden's word for it rather than yours. The guy was supposed to run a route beyond the first down marker. Period. As Madden said, not only are you supposed to do it on third down, you damn well better do it on fourth down. Your response(s) is/are priceless given its/their myopic focus on blasting all things Drew. 449231[/snapback] Yah the WR is supposed to run the route past the marker...but as the QB, Drew needs to put the ball to a WR that is past the marker. Its a share of fault actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Yah the WR is supposed to run the route past the marker...but as the QB, Drew needs to put the ball to a WR that is past the marker. Its a share of fault actually. 449312[/snapback] You ever watch a game from low seat in the endzone? Can you honestly tell me howfar someone is downfield? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 The first team that cut Drew has won it all three times in four years, Drew's only been cut once, and that was by us. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts