Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They should've gone a step further & required a uniform surface for ALL fields. 

 

This quote also annoyed me:

 

"The league's chief medical officer, Dr. Allen Sills, said there are no "statistically significant differences" in lower extremity injuries or concussions that can be attributed to the type of playing surface or a specific surface, despite widespread preferences by players for grass fields and complaints about surfaces such as the one at MetLife Stadium, where the New York Giants and Jets play."

 

Reminds me of your average workers, all experiencing the same issue on a daily basis, who then repeatedly notify upper management of that issue. Then management comes back & tells the people who know better, "We reviewed your claims & have found nothing wrong. Thanks for your valuable feedback while we do nothing to address your problems!"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Tottenham, I believe, already meets the NFL's higher standard which is ludicrous given its injury record. Wembley doesn't. But has a much better injury record. 

 

So call me sceptical.

 

I thought the problem with Tottenham was that the NFL doesn't get to play on the normal surface.  They take it out and replace it with astroturf rolled over concrete.

Just what I heard.

  • Agree 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

I thought the problem with Tottenham was that the NFL doesn't get to play on the normal surface.  They take it out and replace it with astroturf rolled over concrete.

Just what I heard.

 

Yea that's right. 

Posted
6 hours ago, mannc said:

Sure they can.  All they have to do is say “Install this turf, or no NFL game for you.”  Easy as can be.

The NFL should pay for these international field upgrades. 

 

They're not $tarving for cash.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, DrBob806 said:

The NFL should pay for these international field upgrades. 

 

 

When they can “convince” the host city/country to pay or no game, why would the NFL consider any other alternative?

  • Sad 1
Posted
10 hours ago, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

I'll be interested to see if they can force this onto the International stadiums

Sure hope so!! But  unlikely as it’s a $$$ grab.. you mean like when the Bills had to play on the concrete in London? Because the soccer team wouldn’t let them play on the grass?? Unreal that the NFL and Pegs allowed it. But yeah $$$$ grab. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Gugny said:


Is there any way in hell this place isn’t called “The Bedpan,” forever?

 

If you keep saying that, it's going to happen. Shush.

 

 

You'd think that being natural turf, the new Highmark passes the new standard already.

 

I mean.. it's grass for goodness sakes. I thought that was the Gold Standard. What are they going to say "Bluegrass is unacceptable, it must be fescue"?

Edited by boater
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

In the outgoing Highmark Stadium, the Bills use A-Turf Titan 50 which has a low G-Max Rating which measures the shock absorption of the field. It's considered a soft playing surface.

 

However the NFL will be using 2 different measures when approving playing surfaces for 2026: "the BEAST, which is a traction testing device that replicates the movements of an NFL player. The other is called the STRIKE Impact Tester, which helps determine the firmness of each field."

 

It's not clear if A-Turf Titan will be approved but of course it's a moot point because of the natural grass field in the new stadium.

 

That raises a separate question... the assumption that most are making is that any and all natural grass fields will be approved however it seems possible that the league will implement standards for them too.

 

Posted
21 hours ago, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

I'll be interested to see if they can force this onto the International stadiums

 

My position would be that if the international stadiums will NOT provide a quality field, the games will be played elsewhere. The NFL is the 8 million pound gorilla, insist on a quality field or move on. Some other place will do it right. 

 

Posted
Just now, Augie said:

My position would be that if the international stadiums will NOT provide a quality field, the games will be played elsewhere. The NFL is the 8 million pound gorilla, insist on a quality field or move on. Some other place will do it right. 

 

The interesting irony of this discussion is that FIFA mandates natural grass for its major tournaments, requiring North American stadiums, including many NFL venues with artificial turf, to install temporary natural or hybrid grass fields. This included the NFL stadiums in Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles, and New York. When the FIFA games were over, the natural grass was removed.

 

FIFA's policy is driven by player safety concerns.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...