Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Shout out to the refs overall yesterday for letting the players play.

 

In a game that featured 9 lead changes and some very momentum-shifting plays, the refs didn't have a factor. 

 

Kudos to Referees:

Dana McKenzie

Terrence Miles

Mearl Robinson

Anthony Jeffries

Terry Killens Jr.

Thomas Eaton

Alex Moore

Edited by Kaenon
Autocorrect typos
  • Agree 9
Posted
Just now, Kaenon said:

Shout out to the refs overall yesterday for letting the players play.

 

I'm a game that had 9 lead changes and some very momentum-shifting plays, the refs didn't have a factor. 

 

Kudos to Referees:

Dana McKenzie

Terrence Miles

Mearl Robinson

Anthony Jeffries

Terry Killens Jr.

Thomas Eaton

Alex Moore

Ummm, the very soft facemask penalty on one of the (horrific) WR screens to Shakir was a massive call.

  • Disagree 4
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, mannc said:

Ummm, the very soft facemask penalty on one of the (horrific) WR screens to Shakir was a massive call.

We'll take it.  It was dissected pretty well on the telecast and all thought it was a good call. 

Edited by Ned Flanders
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Ned Flanders said:

We'll take it.  It was desiccated pretty well on the telecast and all thought it was a good call. 

Not necessarily a bad call, but we had to look at it closely, in slow motion, to detect a facemask.  Could very easily have been ignored.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Process said:

They directly handed the bucs 3 points with a phantom call on a FG block 

In the modern NFL any ref impact less than a touchdown in considered a spectacular win. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, mannc said:

Ummm, the very soft facemask penalty on one of the (horrific) WR screens to Shakir was a massive call.

No.  Its hard to sound authentic when clearly biased, but his fingers got up under the lip of the helmet, and caused a reaction exactly the same as a face mask.  At first i thought it was a bad call, but i think it was actually a super high level call.... especially once that "rule specialist" guy came on... that dudes a shill for NFL, but he said their is a provision for it in rulebook, I doubt he waws making that up... either way good call and id say the same if it was on us

4 minutes ago, Process said:

They directly handed the bucs 3 points with a phantom call on a FG block 

Yeah that one was rough.  Lineman call that a "*****", its advanced lineman play, but basically, you catch a player over  extending/reaching and you redirect his momentum and drive him down.  Dion has been a beast with it, but he got flagged on it twice last year.... which is rough as hell, considering thats basically highlight reel lineman stuff

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Process said:

They directly handed the bucs 3 points with a phantom call on a FG block 

That play was tuff to officiate, from the refs view it probably 100% looked like he pulled the guy to the ground, and honestly he might have slightly, but I was yelling at the TV like a crazy person when they called it! 😂

 

Screaming Shia Labeouf GIF

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Kaenon said:

Shout out to the refs overall yesterday for letting the players play.

 

In a game that featured 9 lead changes and some very momentum-shifting plays, the refs didn't have a factor. 

 

Kudos to Referees:

Dana McKenzie

Terrence Miles

Mearl Robinson

Anthony Jeffries

Terry Killens Jr.

Thomas Eaton

Alex Moore

I never have seen this from a Fan.

 Positive

 thanks OP

 

And agreed.

and it was a verry Rough game in the trenches. they called the ones they needed to

 More of this please

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Ned Flanders said:

We'll take it.  It was dissected pretty well on the telecast and all thought it was a good call. 

I thought the call should actually be (twisting the players Head with leverage )

 That stuff is dangerous , and watching the replays so many times . Completely egregious and unnecessary 

  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, mannc said:

Ummm, the very soft facemask penalty on one of the (horrific) WR screens to Shakir was a massive call.

He grabbed the inside of Shakirs helmet and twisted it around. The ruling was correct.  The rule judge commentator explained it’s the same if you grab by the mask or the inside of helmet, and twist, that is unnecessary roughness 

  • Agree 1
Posted

I will never, ever, ever, ever give a shout out, or kudos to referees no matter how accurate the game was called. There's not enough years left to make up for all of the egregious mistakes and garbage we've witnessed over the years. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, mannc said:

Ummm, the very soft facemask penalty on one of the (horrific) WR screens to Shakir was a massive call.

Not disagreeing it was a horrific call that sealed the game.
 

However, having watched 25 years of the Brady and calls, I make zero apologies. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


but the VIRTUAL MEASUREMENT CAN NEVER BE WRONG!!!!?!?!?!  

The virtual measurement saves having to bring the sticks out to measure, but has nothing to do with where the referee places the ball.

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Pete said:

He grabbed the inside of Shakirs helmet and twisted it around. The ruling was correct.  The rule judge commentator explained it’s the same if you grab by the mask or the inside of helmet, and twist, that is unnecessary roughness 

It was pretty soft. But I'll take it.

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...