EssexBill Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Well, you always need to get better. I don’t think an argument can be made that the Bills are better than a bottom 5 WR room. Will that ultimately cost them? TBD. It did cost them dearly the other day. Amari is obviously cooked and looked so out of shape in his brief return this offseason. Who is this year’s “Cooper?” Olave? Jakobi Meyers? Doubs? DJ Moore? I’d try calling Arizona and offering a 1st and whatever WR they want for MHJ. It’s a long shot but maybe it’s just not working out there? I saw an article today with the OC there saying that he didn’t do enough to get him the ball. Maybe you can slide in and buy him cheap from a 🗑️organization. I think there’s about a 2% chance Arizona would listen but it’s worth the call. if you don’t ask you don’t get. I’d hope Beane has had the phone glued to his ear since Monday morning trying find a WR, let’s hope someone takes his call Edited 2 hours ago by EssexBill 2 Quote
LabattBlue Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 37 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Don't look at top teams, look at those who go furthest in the playoffs. Philly played more games than anyone. They had 1 player over 90% of the snaps. 3 in the 80%. 1 in 70%. The WR with the most snaps was 69%, then 66% and 58%. Their QB played 80%. Cheifs played a ton. 90% 5 (4 OL and Patty) 80% 1 (Kelce) 70% NONE 60% 2 Highest WR snap counts were 65%, 59%, and 36% Commies: 90% 3 (QB and 2 OL) 80% 2 (1 WR) 70% 1 60% 3 (2 TEs) Next WRs were in the 40s ProFootballReference has snap count data, feel free to comb through it last year. I did use pro football reference. Cute that you only used the two super teams and ignored some other playoff teams that did have a WR over 80%. Quote
jlatas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, EssexBill said: ... We need this season’s Cooper Am I the only one out here that thinks Cooper was a bust??? I feel like the only reason most dont b*tch about him is that he only cost us 800K. He didnt look like he was interested in playing football, and while he did have a couple of great catches, he added very little imo. Edited 1 hour ago by jlatas 2 Quote
JaCrispy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, Andrew Son said: I find the focus on the offense to be truly bizarre. It's been historically good. If we fall short this year it will be because of the defense, again. You mean “when”… Quote
MasterStrategist Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 58 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: In the 8 games that Cooper played, the Bills threw for 264.4 yards per game and scored 35.5 PPG. In the 8 games that Cooper did not play, the Bills threw for 203.6 yards per game and scored 28.1 PPG. For those of you that don’t think that 7.4 PPG difference is significant, the Bills finished 2nd in the NFL at 30.6 PPG. If you subtracted 7.4 PPG and were at 23.2 PPG they would have finished 12th. Anyone who thinks Cooper was the reason for improvement --- did you watch the games? Josh was playing at an MVP caliber, obviously, and we were getting solid production from our RBs (especially Ty) in pass game. Cooper was a decoy who was already over the hill, hence his retirement this offseason. Brady has better/healthier weapons right now...and we are struggling, against Saints at times and Pats, because hes become more predictable and Josh just isnt playing at his top level yet. Same as LY, Josh turned it on 2nd half- hopefully we see the offensive rhythm improve, because weve been very inconsistent 2 weeks in a row, possibly 3 dating back to Miami. 1 Quote
EssexBill Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, jlatas said: Am I the only one out here that thinks Cooper was a bust??? I feel like the only reason most dont b*tch about him is that he only cost us 800K. He didnt look like he was interested in playing football, and while he did have a couple of great catches, he added very little imo. Like I said, it wasn’t so much that Cooper put up great numbers but his presence opened up the field for the rest of the receivers. Would have been nice to get more production from him too, but I don’t think we’d have made the AFCCG without that trade I really believe that Quote
Jauronimo Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Its time for the new "Some people eat, some of the time!" offense. Quote
LabattBlue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Time for “everybody eats” to be replaced with “who’s hot and who’s not”. Quote
BeastMaster Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: It's simply not realistic to expect a team's A game for months. In the last calendar year: - Under 15 TOs - 1 loss at home - Consistently scoring 30 A bad game was inevitable, we were never going 17-0 and this team is way too talented to play well and lose. That's all well and good, but the same issues that have plagued this team in crucial spots once again reared it's ugly head I think that is more of the complaint here...that we aren't seeing the coaching staff adjust and adapt to what many of us fans see as a problem that has to be addressed Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I wouldn't be opposed to Beane accidentally stumbling on a WR1 to pair with Kincaid. Keon is definitely not going to be that guy. And Shakir will continue as a reliable WR2. Quote
JimBob2232 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Sure - I'd love a jamar chase or something...but our WRs and TEs are fine. similar to what mahomes has. id rather upgrade the LB and CB/S slots. Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said: Anyone who thinks Cooper was the reason for improvement --- did you watch the games? Josh was playing at an MVP caliber, obviously, and we were getting solid production from our RBs (especially Ty) in pass game. Cooper was a decoy who was already over the hill, hence his retirement this offseason. Brady has better/healthier weapons right now...and we are struggling, against Saints at times and Pats, because hes become more predictable and Josh just isnt playing at his top level yet. Same as LY, Josh turned it on 2nd half- hopefully we see the offensive rhythm improve, because weve been very inconsistent 2 weeks in a row, possibly 3 dating back to Miami. Again, argue eye test all that you want. I posted FACTUAL numbers. No one is advocating for Amari Cooper. It’s INARGUABLE, that the passing game and scoring was better in the 8 games that he played vs. the ones that he didn’t. That’s all that post said. You are coming here to say, “yeah but this” and “yeah but that.” Feel free to argue for whatever you want except please don’t argue that the passing game AND scoring weren’t better with him than without. The numbers are the numbers Quote
Buffalo Boy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, Andrew Son said: I find the focus on the offense to be truly bizarre. It's been historically good. If we fall short this year it will be because of the defense, again. I don’t think it’s bizarre because the O has looked kinda wonky in the passing game and we got beat by the Pats, which hurts and is frustrating. I think a decent amount of people don’t give Vrabel as much credit as he is due. They are a clear # 2 and we shouldn’t take them lightly. But, yeah, the Defense is looking like 💩. As usual, offseason rose colored glasses were worn by many. There were a lot of “if” opinions being treated as “when”. The problem with hoping and wishing is the real world doesn’t pay them any heed. Bishop is exceeding expectations so that’s a plus. Oliver came out gang busters for a game. Rookie Walker has been a pleasant surprise and maybe Jones but the rest🤷♂️ Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago 1 hour ago, jlatas said: Am I the only one out here that thinks Cooper was a bust??? I feel like the only reason most dont b*tch about him is that he only cost us 800K. He didnt look like he was interested in playing football, and while he did have a couple of great catches, he added very little imo. Lol, this conversation wasn’t about “was he good or not in a Bills uniform.” The FACTS are that the offense produced at a much greater clip with him in the lineup than without him there. You can attribute that to whatever you want but you can’t say that they didn’t have more success. 1 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago 3 hours ago, GolfandBills said: Lots of other teams pay high priced WRs and have a highly paid franchise QB. That’s a cop out Sure, but then you don’t have a line or defense either. I think with the rising costs of free agent receivers, you are better off drafting receivers and letting them walk after their rookie contracts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.