Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

It's tanking with extra steps though. There's no reason for it. 

 

5 minutes ago, Low Positive said:

It's a bizarre move, to say the least. It has Mike Brown's fingerprints all over it. 

If Brown pushed the deal through, it's got to have favourable tax implications for the Bengals. 😁

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

 

If Brown pushed the deal through, it's got to have favourable tax implications for the Bengals. 😁

What's more funny is that Mike Brown watched Flacco throw 2 picks against his sorry defense in week 1. He had front-row seats for that, and still decided to hitch his franchise to that wagon just because he was basically free. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, PetermansRedemption said:

If they wanted to compete, Cousins was the move. This is just a save face move for the fan base. 

I read the falcons wanted a “premium pick” and for the new team to pay most of cousins salary. I agree he’s the best available right now, (maybe Winston) but to give up a 2 or 3 for 10 games? Bad move 

Posted
4 hours ago, Low Positive said:

Mike Brown went all in this year. He is demanding that they keep trying to compete. Also, Browning is playing like Peterman back there and Chase is starting to chirp. Something had to be done. But why this and not Russell Wilson?

BC Wilson is trash AND an #######.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...