10/5/2025 GAMEDAY Bills vs Patriots Post Game Thread SNF

[Low Positive]

5 minutes ago, steven50 said:

The last time we had a generational QB his name was Jim Kelly and when we played inferior opponents he was sitting on the bench with his helmet off drinking Gatorade midway through the fourth quarter because we buried inferior opponents early in the game.

 

Call it killer instinct, putting our foot on there neck, or whatever. We are not doing it.

Oh my god, your memory is bad. It’s easy to find bad losses. In 1992, the Bills lost at home to the Dolphins when Kelly threw 4 INTs. The next week they went out to LA and got killed by a horrible Raiders team. That took two seconds to find. We also lost to the Jets and Colts that year. All bad teams. 

[Generic_Bills_Fan]

9 minutes ago, steven50 said:

The last time we had a generational QB his name was Jim Kelly and when we played inferior opponents he was sitting on the bench with his helmet off drinking Gatorade midway through the fourth quarter because we buried inferior opponents early in the game.

 

Call it killer instinct, putting our foot on there neck, or whatever. We are not doing it.

I feel like I remember those bills teams having a few unreasonably close games with an even worse pats team tbh haha I gotta go check myself 

Edited 4 hours ago by Generic_Bills_Fan

[CincyBillsFan]

2 minutes ago, DapperCam said:

 

Bills SB teams lost to inferior opponents during the regular season plenty. What is this revisionist history?

This is true.  But the operative word here is "Bills SB teams"  the current Bills are not yet a SB team.  

[Preds]

1 minute ago, Walking Tall said:

Yep. Let’s fire him after a 4-1 start! 

I don't think any McD hater including myself is saying that, however, I strongly feel he should have been fired years ago, and every season with him is another year wasted in Josh's quest for a Super Bowl championship.  McD reached his peak several years ago, nothing but regression since with the exception of Josh carrying the team on his shoulders.  I would love to see McD replaced in the off-season with an offence focused coach who would let Josh be Josh and bury teams early instead of slow rolling things like McD does to protect his swiss cheese defences that absolutely suck in crunch time.

[billybob71]

I really hope Allen gets to play with  a really good offensive head coach/ play caller while he is still in his prime!, whether it be with the Bills or another team it would really be something to see!!

[Generic_Bills_Fan]

Just now, Low Positive said:

Oh my god, your memory is bad. It’s easy to find bad losses. In 1992, the Bills lost at home to the Dolphins when Kelly threw 4 INTs. The next week they went out to LA and got killed by a horrible Raiders team. That took two seconds to find. We also lost to the Jets and Colts that year. All bad teams. 

Haha yea I had to scratch my head at that one too 😂. Pretty sure a bad pats team gave us trouble a few times 

[Cray51]

Just now, UKBillFan said:

 

The Bills were exactly what they've been is an honest assessment - and that answer is not very good. If not for Bishop's miracle play last week then may have lost to the Saints. They let poor Jets and Dolphins teams hang around for longer than they should. They only beat the Ravens because of an excellent play from Oliver and Josh then dragging them home through sheer willpower.

 

The Bills have been really unimpressive this year against - Ravens aside - a cakewalk of a schedule. So of course there will be concerns.

Now I’ve heard it all!  the Bills aren’t that good…

 

man, better not tell other teams we aren’t that good!  If that’s the case, nobody is that good!

[Roundybout]

Just now, billybob71 said:

I really hope Allen gets to play with  a really good offensive head coach/ play caller while he is still in his prime!, whether it be with the Bills or another team it would really be something to see!!

I just can’t agree with these takes so long as the roster is in the shape it’s in. 

[UKBillFan]

1 minute ago, LifeLongBillsFan said:

Just once I would like a reporter to ask McD why his defense never wins a game for him

why we spend all Our draft capital on the defense and still some how they are never good

 

As said, the defense let through 23 points. That's not awful. Not great, yes, but not awful.

[TheFunPolice]

I don't think McDermott is trying to "protect his defense" so much as he has a certain philosophy that, if adhered to strictly, will usually result in a win. 

 

There's a lot of bad football being played every week. Anyone who watches games around the league sees that. So the strategy works most of the time.

 

Add in a talent like Allen and it works even more of the time.

 

But against an elite opponent, who doesn't throw the costly int and can stay disciplined enough all game to take the small stuff it often does not work.

 

 

 

 

[UKBillFan]

Just now, Cray51 said:

Now I’ve heard it all!  the Bills aren’t that good…

 

man, better not tell other teams we aren’t that good!  If that’s the case, nobody is that good!

 

Other than maybe the Lions I'm starting to think that is the case at the moment. Though I fear the Chiefs are staring to get into their stride.

[jkeerie]

1 minute ago, UKBillFan said:

 

The defense conceded 23. That is not hideous.

 

(Though this is not me saying massive changes aren't required).

The Bills had more yards, including rushing, more time of possession, more first downs, and more 3rd down conversions.  BUT, they also had more penalties and more turnovers.  That was the difference in the game.  They...with the help of Hoculi...lost the game.

 

Diggs was huge for them.  He was huge for the Bills when he played here...just not in the playoffs.

[DapperCam]

I will say this, I doubt the Pats win the rematch (or at least not in the same way). Doubt the reffing will be as wacky, and I'm going to guess the Bills will prevent Maye rolling out to his right.

[Einstein]

Just now, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

so I did go back and watch:

 

1) 2nd and 10: had cook right in front of him (maybe only a short gain, but depends on the leverage), but had Palmer for an easy out for like 7-8 yard

 

Yes - as I already said, he could have hit Cook for a 3 yard catch (and gotten Cook crushed by two linebackers).

 

He did NOT have Palmer for an easy 7-8 yards. I know what game you’re playing - it’s the “I see a player momentarily open while the QB is going trough his progressions, looking to the complete opposite side of the field”

 

When Allen reaches Palmer in his progressions, he is blanketed downfield.

 

Just now, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

2) 3rd and 10: two crossers, both open, especially Shakir on the left. Allen bailed way too early. 

 

You wanted Allen to throw thid 3 yard crosser… on 3rd and 10…  to make it 4th and 7?

 

Thats what you’re going with?

Thats your argument?

 

Instead of throwing to an open Shakir … who is past the sticks? Which is what he did.

 

 

Some of you argue just to argue.

 

 

[TheFunPolice]

4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

They have a very good team. It’s going to be tough. 

 

They're solid but not elite, in my opinion anyway. 

 

Should be interesting for sure. 

[billybob71]

Just now, Roundybout said:

I just can’t agree with these takes so long as the roster is in the shape it’s in. 

I guess I was assuming a great offensive coach would have the pieces and weapons in place to run his scheme but I see your point

[KOKBILLS]

1 minute ago, billybob71 said:

Agreed, does McD have this philosophy to protect his D? Just thinking out loud here

I think so... But I also think there is a happy medium that they can't seem to figure out... There are ways to control the clock without doing dumb, risky things. And they do sometimes... But I feel like they have become so formula-matic on Offense and have moved way to far away from a controlled short and intermediate passing game that they are causing their own staling issues. When Diggs was here they would kill teams with the short and intermediate stuff and the chains were always moving. Now it's just too many runs and screens. Watch the rest of the NFL... There's almost always someone open... But the QB play is up and down... We have Josh... The Bills will go full games and not take advantage of obvious weakness in opponents Defenses and literally go right at their strengths... It's cool when it works... But it's risky, and I just don't think it's that smart tbh... But what do I know... 

[SUNTANBILLS FAN]

So i want to know why it took to the second half for cook to get runs with the counter action. Stop being cute and tricky . Let James cook 

[Cray51]

Just now, UKBillFan said:

 

Other than maybe the Lions I'm starting to think that is the case at the moment. Though I fear the Chiefs are staring to get into their stride.

The lions did exactly what we just did in week 1.  Every team has a bad game, it’s just what happens.

 

The Bills are still right at the top of the league. 

[Low Positive]

2 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Yes - as I already said, he could have hit Cook for a 3 yard catch (and gotten Cook crushed by two linebackers).

 

He did NOT have Palmer for an easy 7-8 yards. I know what game you’re playing - it’s the “I see a player momentarily open while the QB is going trough his progressions, looking to the complete opposite side of the field”

 

When Allen reaches Palmer in his progressions, he is blanketed downfield.

 

 

You wanted Allen to throw thid 3 yard crosser… on 3rd and 10…  to make it 4th and 7?

 

Thats what you’re going with?

Thats your argument?

 

Instead of throwing to an open Shakir … who is past the sticks? Which is what he did.

 

 

Some of you argue just to argue.

 

 

We have about 15-20 grown men throwing a temper tantrum right now. Don’t expect rationality.