Shortchaz Posted September 29 Posted September 29 Are we allowed to grade Spencer Rattler’s appearance? 😬 1 Quote
bigK14094 Posted September 29 Posted September 29 Brady had a Daboll like brain cramp on the Shikir running play on 4th down. Brought back memories........of Daboll. Quote
sunshynman Posted September 29 Posted September 29 (edited) Offense: - QB (A-) - RB (A++) - OL (B) _ OC (B) Defense: - DL (C) - SECONDARY (c) - DC (C) Overall: - Bills (B+) - McD (B) Edited September 29 by sunshynman changed overall Quote
26TrapDraw Posted September 29 Posted September 29 4 hours ago, ProcessTruster said: Against a top 5 team, this would have been a convincing loss. If this was played in New Orleans, not sure it comes out as it did. I enjoy a win as much as anyone who suffered for 20 years, but unless Hoecht, Obunjobi, Milano, Ed and Max get and stay active, I don't see IT this year either. Do you think this team can compete with Philly? I don't. We'll find out in December. Thanks for saying this. It’s the cold Hard truth. So Many Homers just wanna say it was a W. There is serious cause for concern for those of us that understand that our all world Qb cant play defense and without one that at least comes close to his championship play we will be watching someone else in the Super Bowl again. i hope they can figure it out by the playoffs. 1 Quote
Big Turk Posted September 29 Posted September 29 (edited) 2 hours ago, bigK14094 said: Brady had a Daboll like brain cramp on the Shikir running play on 4th down. Brought back memories........of Daboll. I mean it was a first down until VanDerMark tripped and whiffed on his block. But yeah...maybe a little too much confidence in your backup RT to make that type of athletic play. 5 hours ago, ProcessTruster said: Against a top 5 team, this would have been a convincing loss. If this was played in New Orleans, not sure it comes out as it did. I enjoy a win as much as anyone who suffered for 20 years, but unless Hoecht, Obunjobi, Milano, Ed and Max get and stay active, I don't see IT this year either. Do you think this team can compete with Philly? I don't. We'll find out in December. Against a top 5 team you wouldn't have seen this. Let's stop pretending the Bills usually have these games against good teams. Typically in those games they look like the better team. Edited September 29 by Big Turk Quote
GerstAusGosheim Posted September 29 Posted September 29 4 hours ago, Mango said: I don't think we are having bend but don't break issues. This defense is just flat out getting gashed at every level. The front 7 has just been bad despite the individual brightspots. This, we are getting to a point where McD may have to, and probably should, take over the defense again. You don't get unlimited bites at the apple, and we have one this year, again. We can't waste it. I suspect it will either be just before the KC game as not to blow the opportunity, or just after the KC game if we lose. Handing the DC job over to a rookie was almost as bad of an idea as handing the OC job over to a rookie in Ken Dorsey. Under Sean, the D folded in key moments against the Eagles, Bucs, Broncos, Pats, Giants, Chiefs. And 2 of those losses were partially the result of a mistimed blitz. Quote
CincyBillsFan Posted September 29 Posted September 29 QB: A RB: A+ WR: B TE: B OL: B DL: C LB: C- DB: B ST: C Quote
Don Otreply Posted September 29 Posted September 29 We won the game, 4-0, 👍👍👍👍👍👍🍸🚬🍸🚬🍸🚬🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸, I can’t keep this up much longer, 🤣 1 Quote
hondo in seattle Posted September 29 Posted September 29 9 hours ago, wjag said: Offense: - QB (A-) -- 72% completion, 3 TDs, big runs - RB (A) -- 100 yards and a TD - OL (C) -- Pass blocking gave up B2B sacks _ OC (C) -- Still don't like 4th down call Defense: - DL (C-) -- too many yards rushing allowed - SECONDARY (B) -- Bishop's play was enormous - DC (C) -- Rattler rattled -- No plan for the running QB Special Teams on Offense: PR (C) -- Nothing Special -- let Bills get pinned in deep by failing to catch ball KR (C) -- Nothing Special -- Samuel not better or worse than Codrington K (A) -- 4/4 XPs and 1/1 FG P (C) -- Nothing Special -- Not better than the punter we let go. Poor punting distance Special Teams on Defense: PR (C) -- Held my breath a few times. Got the punter killed on B2B weeks. KR (C) -- Nothing special. Overall: - Bills (B) -- I never believed the vegas line. Figured Saints were playing for their season - McD (B) -- Nothing stood out to me. Thought his TOs at the end of the half were unnecessary. Bills were not playing well in 2nd Qtr to want another drive. Grade inflation? If Cook gets an "A" for 107 yards and a short trip to the endzone, how would you grade OJ when he ran for 273 yards and 2 TDs against the Lions? Never mind. I know: "A+" Quote
wjag Posted September 29 Posted September 29 Just now, hondo in seattle said: Grade inflation? If Cook gets an "A" for 107 yards and a short trip to the endzone, how would you grade OJ when he ran for 273 yards and 2 TDs against the Lions? Never mind. I know: "A+" Actually AA++ 1 Quote
Billsfed1 Posted September 29 Posted September 29 11 hours ago, Italian Bills said: After another very expected (but not easy) win, let’s say what you think about at what level the Bills (players and coaches) played. Offense: - QB (b+) - RB (a) - OL (d) _ OC (b) Defense: - DL (c) - SECONDARY (b) - DC (c) Overall: - Bills (b-) - McD (b) I really like the concept of this post. Pretty much agree with everything here, the only thing maybe I’d argue is your being a little stiff with the OL grade. The run defense deserved a F lol. Considering this was far from our A game, we still won by 10+ points which is fairly impressive. Quote
alanvh2o Posted September 30 Posted September 30 I gotta say; looked like the "no cover/ under" fix was in. Quote
Gregg Posted September 30 Posted September 30 (edited) They got the win despite not playing their best. The one thing I thought would happen but didn't was when the Bills scored to make it 21-10, I thought they would take over after that. Get the ball back and make it 28-10 and the rest of the game would be garbage time. Still won by 12 despite the game being close in the 4th quarter. Edited September 30 by Gregg Quote
Pete Posted September 30 Posted September 30 20 hours ago, sunshynman said: Oh, It was clearly obvious Van Denmark was worried about the drones. He is in no way a capable backup for Spencer! Maybe as a backup guard, in a pinch. Joe Marino reviewed the tape and Van Demark graded out very high in both pass blocking and run blocking. Van Demark played 48 plays. Marino said Van Demark was excellent on 46 of 48 plays. One of the plays was 4th and 1 flip to Shakir, which went nowhere. Van Demark got tripped up by Torrance, fell down, Saints rushed thru vacated spot and stopped Shakir 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.