NoSaint Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 12 minutes ago, Big Turk said: So when Diggs was tearing things up averaging 86 yards a game over 11 games with 7 TDs under Dorsey and then became a complete non-factor under Brady I am supposed to believe that he suddenly forgot how to get open? what route combos was he benefitting from that Brady stopped calling? which of those do you think play well to our current room? Edited 17 hours ago by NoSaint Quote
finn Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: what route combos was he benefitting from that Brady stopped calling? which of those do you think play well to our current room? Every route in the book except wide receiver screen, half back dive, halfback screen, jet sweep, and mesh routes. With Brady and McDermott, you fit into their scheme or you get cut. 1 1 Quote
BADOLBILZ Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Big Turk said: So when Diggs was tearing things up averaging 86 yards a game over 11 games with 7 TDs under Dorsey and then became a complete non-factor under Brady I am supposed to believe that he suddenly forgot how to get open? Diggs was getting fed at the expense of the team. Personally, I thought Dorsey got scapegoated for giving the world what it wants.......Josh Allen throwing the ball all over the field. But Diggs was getting doubled and that allowed teams to put CB1 on Gabe Davis and make throwing to him extremely unproductive. The personnel wasn't there to make that the right approach and I thought Dorsey had already begun the changes a couple weeks prior that Brady would further lean into. They lost that Denver game because of a substitution error by McDermott at the end of the game. Dorsey got scapegoated but as I said at the time it wasn't a big dropoff and a shot in the arm couldn't hurt. Brady was capable. They went from 5-5 at the time and then won 23 of their next 27 meaningful regular season games under Brady. The issue here isn't the OC. Does he have some ineffective calls we hate every week? Yes, but that only seems like a HUGE problem because the margin for error has diminished as the available talent has. As impotent as they've looked on the road they might have won those Atlanta and Houston games just having Glass Kincaid healthy. 4 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: Diggs was getting fed at the expense of the team. Personally, I thought Dorsey got scapegoated for giving the world what it wants.......Josh Allen throwing the ball all over the field. But Diggs was getting doubled and that allowed teams to put CB1 on Gabe Davis and make throwing to him extremely unproductive. The personnel wasn't there to make that the right approach and I thought Dorsey had already begun the changes a couple weeks prior that Brady would further lean into. They lost that Denver game because of a substitution error by McDermott at the end of the game. Dorsey got scapegoated but as I said at the time it wasn't a big dropoff and a shot in the arm couldn't hurt. Brady was capable. They went from 5-5 at the time and then won 23 of their next 27 meaningful regular season games under Brady. The issue here isn't the OC. Does he have some ineffective calls we hate every week? Yes, but that only seems like a HUGE problem because the margin for error has diminished as the available talent has. As impotent as they've looked on the road they might have won those Atlanta and Houston games just having Glass Kincaid healthy. Can’t argue with that when the stats say they have most yards on offense in the league @ 4200… 4th most passing yards and 1st in rushing. The OC isn’t THE issue but he is an issue. Bad play selections at crucial times and downs play a huge part. A bigger part is the turnovers. Clean football was how we get so many wins. 1 1 Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, FireChans said: Yeah this is maxed out Shakir like I tried to tell @Alphadawg7 last year. He has talent and I like what he offers, but he is not good enough to be a focal point from the slot like a prime Kupp or JSN or ARSB. I’ve never said at any point Shakir was a WR1. Literally never made that claim. And I’ve never said he should be the focal point either. Quote
Dan Darragh Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago I'll bet the OP really hates it when someone adds a post to this thread and bumps it up the list. 2 Quote
DCOrange Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 4 hours ago, Big Turk said: Khalil Shakir for multiple years had the highest separation rate against man coverage in the NFL. Now all of a sudden he can't win against man? Not buying it. We have Gregg Roman 2.0 Great run concepts, bad pass concepts I don't think separation data is generally very good yet but Shakir has pretty much always been below average or downright bad in terms of YPRR vs. man. He's always been great against zone. 1 Quote
Psautcsk Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) https://www.louisianasports.net/2025/11/22/report-saints-may-not-be-allowed-to-release-brandin-cooks/latest-stories/ Didn't know where else to post this. Edited 14 hours ago by Psautcsk Quote
notpolian Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Dan Darragh said: I'll bet the OP really hates it when someone adds a post to this thread and bumps it up the list. I know I do. But at least I wasn't the OP. It's more of a LOL right now to be honest. Quote
VW82 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Perhaps it's too early to go here but does anyone still believe (like so many did pre-trade deadline) that we just needed to trade for a #1 and Bills would have a real shot to compete for SB this year? Quote
gobills404 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) Well hang on just a second. Our WRs as a whole averaged a pitiful 141 yards per game last year vs a monstrous 145 this year. Turns out OP was right all along. Edited 13 hours ago by gobills404 3 Quote
Chaos Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Everyone who knows football knows that quietly making the WR room better, is the first step in secretly building an elite offense. People are going to be stunned when the secret is finally revealed. 1 Quote
DJB Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Bring back Stevie. Would probably instantly still be our #1 lol But honestly man he would have cooked with Josh 1 Quote
Rocky Landing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 hours ago, ScottishBills said: Any chance of an admission that you are the one with the schtick!?!? No, didn't think so. The rest of us were right the whole time 🤷🏽♂️ No joy in it, but worth pointing out given the amount of wanky replies that appear when you criticise the obvious shitshow we have been watching in the pass game for 2 years I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong, and unfortunately, I was clearly wrong about Coleman. Not sure why you feel the need to throw shade at me specifically. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: I’ve never said at any point Shakir was a WR1. Literally never made that claim. And I’ve never said he should be the focal point either. I didn’t mean to imply you did either, but I do recall us having an argument on where Shakir maxes out on the efficiency/volume curve, and I was of the opinion that 2024 was the ceiling. Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago Ah yes, tsw necromancy, resurrecting dead threads since nineteen hundred and ninety five Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.