All I Need is Hope Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Our biggest needs are at DT/DE/S/WR. We're a top 5 scoring offense with more weapons than last year (including Kincaid/Shakir/Cook continuing to improve). I don't want to "run back" the same defensive line (minus Floyd) and would prefer we went BPA at 28, looking for DE/WR/DT/S... in that order. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 9 hours ago, Beck Water said: Anstifter (Fingers run to online dictionary) Agreed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norcalbillsfan Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 The pick up of Samuel just put the bills in a position to take bpa, wether that's wr dt safety whatever. But it makes me feel so much better, because I haven't liked a few of beanes picks when he has to fill holes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 All this talk about "We need a young deep threat" in the 1st round. Stop trying to control that which cannot be controlled. Our younger, speed threat is now on the team. Tyreek Hill, Age 30, 40 time: 4.29 Curtis Samuel, Age 27, 40 time: 4.31 Fair comparison. Look for Brady to use Samuel with a lot of motion and 15 yd slants which go for 30 - 40 yds. Would you take Tyreek Hill as a suitable #2? Yes. I give you a younger Tyreek Hill already on our team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunkirk Donski Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 2 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said: All this talk about "We need a young deep threat" in the 1st round. Stop trying to control that which cannot be controlled. Our younger, speed threat is now on the team. Tyreek Hill, Age 30, 40 time: 4.29 Curtis Samuel, Age 27, 40 time: 4.31 Fair comparison. Look for Brady to use Samuel with a lot of motion and 15 yd slants which go for 30 - 40 yds. Would you take Tyreek Hill as a suitable #2? Yes. I give you a younger Tyreek Hill already on our team. What a ridiculous comparison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 10 hours ago, Beck Water said: Anstifter My German grandmother used to call me that for some reason. 1 minute ago, Bangarang said: What a ridiculous comparison OK, I'll amend it: We now have a younger, speedy WR like Tyreek Hill minus the cash payoffs to injury victims. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 3 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said: OK, I'll amend it: We now have a younger, speedy WR like Tyreek Hill minus the cash payoffs to injury victims. Why are you so desperate to put them in the same sentence as if they are comparable players? If you're expecting Samuel to be a good #2 then you're setting yourself up for major disappointment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 14 hours ago, BringBackFergy said: Diggs, Shakir, Hollins, Samuel, Shorter…even Kincaid (WR/TE). Nice WR room. Face it…we need an interior O lineman or a safety. Deal with it. A nice room? Maybe. I don't hate it. I guess it depends on what your standard it. This might be an average group of targets. Maybe Diggs elevates it to above-average. Maybe it's even a playoff-caliber receiver room. To me, though, it doesn't look like an elite, Lombardi-hoisting group of receivers. Brady is the wild card. Maybe he can scheme guys open more than we've seen in the recent past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 14 hours ago, BringBackFergy said: Diggs, Shakir, Hollins, Samuel, Shorter…even Kincaid (WR/TE). Nice WR room. Face it…we need an interior O lineman or a safety. Deal with it. Disagree. Two reasons: 1. we need Diggs replacement who could be thre at 28 or by a slight trade up (Brian Thomas Jr). 2. WR in Rd. 1 gives an extra year of cost control. Additionally, we need a LB over O lineman. WR S/LB/DL/IOL on repeat until another good WR pops up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 I dont think this changes the desire to add a wr. The team lost 3 contributors off the team brought in 2. The desire to add 2 has left but another guy with speed will be brought in. I could see a D line at 28 if they like an edge. With the addition of Samuel I could get behind Leggette or best remaing wr at 60. I think with what Buffalo has for needs the pick selections matches up. Day 3 you can find secondary depth and mid rounds you can find interior help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgg716 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Only in the delusional 1995 mindset we have going does a 60 catch wr answer our issues. Because more d lineman will finally fix it.. also in this scheme, zero need to spend any high value resources at safety. Our starting safety next year should be the 6th rounder 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, BringBackFergy said: My German grandmother used to call me that for some reason. My German-speaking grandfather would say your German grandmother was a Wise Woman! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said: A nice room? Maybe. I don't hate it. I guess it depends on what your standard it. This might be an average group of targets. Maybe Diggs elevates it to above-average. Maybe it's even a playoff-caliber receiver room. To me, though, it doesn't look like an elite, Lombardi-hoisting group of receivers. Brady is the wild card. Maybe he can scheme guys open more than we've seen in the recent past. Speaking of Lombardi Trophy - Would you say the Chief’s WR room was stellar last year? The answer is NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 2 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said: Speaking of Lombardi Trophy - Would you say the Chief’s WR room was stellar last year? The answer is NO The Chiefs #1 receiver is a TE named Kelce. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 15 hours ago, buffblue said: This is just an awful post Deal with it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 2 minutes ago, Beck Water said: The Chiefs #1 receiver is a TE named Kelce. My point exactly!! 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 13 hours ago, BringBackFergy said: After your 500 word essay, I submit five words: “Kansas City Chiefs. Super Bowl Champions” Cool. Wake me when the Bills' defense starts performing in the playoffs like the Chiefs' D did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amprov56 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 15 hours ago, BringBackFergy said: Diggs, Shakir, Hollins, Samuel, Shorter…even Kincaid (WR/TE). Nice WR room. Face it…we need an interior O lineman or a safety. Deal with it. How dare you upset some really great group think, just follow the crowd! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo4Life01 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, BringBackFergy said: All this talk about "We need a young deep threat" in the 1st round. Stop trying to control that which cannot be controlled. Our younger, speed threat is now on the team. Tyreek Hill, Age 30, 40 time: 4.29 Curtis Samuel, Age 27, 40 time: 4.31 Fair comparison. Look for Brady to use Samuel with a lot of motion and 15 yd slants which go for 30 - 40 yds. Would you take Tyreek Hill as a suitable #2? Yes. I give you a younger Tyreek Hill already on our team. Will all due respect, Hill has a career average of 14.1 yards. A true deep threat. Samuel has a career average of 10.7 yards. Much more in line with what you see out of a 'possession receiver'. They are no where close to being the same player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.