BananaB Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 hours ago, Draconator said: Why have one rapist when you can have two? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I admit, I got really excited for half a second 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Smith Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 12 minutes ago, BananaB said: Why have one rapist when you can have two? When did he rape someone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNYfan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I think an UBER driver alleged as such. His bros backed up his story, including Ronald Darby 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Clyde Smith said: When did he rape someone? Didn’t he get crabs? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 15 minutes ago, BananaB said: Why have one rapist when you can have two? A seafood section rapist too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toomstone.Part.Duex Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Didn’t he get crabs? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Roundybout said: Dang would have been a quality add 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Roundybout said: For that price, assuming we pivoted to Jones, not that we were still in after signing Jones. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 2 hours ago, ngbills said: Question I have is Beane trying to sign anyone right now? Were we talking to any of these RB's or other guys that signed? Are we talking to guys right now or are we just playing the waiting game. The way they handled the Allen restrux makes me think they are ok just resigning a few of their own, adding late free agents and the draft. Hoping that I am wrong and we can at least add a legit WR, S or DL. You'll know we're talking to someone when they sign here just like most offseasons with Beane. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikePJ76 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 25 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Oh, he’s about to get paid paid. Why? He has been all potential to this point. He is always battling an injury also. I was interested in the bills trading for him last year to help the pass rush and now I am really glad they did not. He really didn't do much in SF. Washington must love having that extra 3rd this year. He could only manage to get 3.5 sacks in 12 games in SF playing opposite of Nick Bosa. I have no idea why anyone would pay a premium for sacks to a pass rusher who does not get sacks. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, Draconator said: so Taron 3 for 25 then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsfaninSB Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: Why? He has been all potential to this point. He is always battling an injury also. I was interested in the bills trading for him last year to help the pass rush and now I am really glad they did not. He really didn't do much in SF. Washington must love having that extra 3rd this year. He could only manage to get 3.5 sacks in 12 games in SF playing opposite of Nick Bosa. I have no idea why anyone would pay a premium for sacks to a pass rusher who does not get sacks. Stop using critical thinking during FA season! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceVilanch Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 18 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: Why? He has been all potential to this point. He is always battling an injury also. I was interested in the bills trading for him last year to help the pass rush and now I am really glad they did not. He really didn't do much in SF. Washington must love having that extra 3rd this year. He could only manage to get 3.5 sacks in 12 games in SF playing opposite of Nick Bosa. I have no idea why anyone would pay a premium for sacks to a pass rusher who does not get sacks. I think he'll have a Clowney type career, getting paid until he turns 30 on potential, and DL coaches and DCs each thinking they'll be the guy to unlock it. Admittedly I thought he was going to be a beast after his first year, and he still could be (potentially) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoonerBillsFan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 30 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Dang would have been a quality add I would have rather had him than DQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toomstone.Part.Duex Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Where is Carolina getting all this money? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.