Jump to content

Ed Oliver big extension


Recommended Posts

Nice job by Beane and team.  Re-watch the games from LY, and Ed disrupted alot of games in the 2nd half of season (when his ankle healed).

 

Beane mentioned a few times, unprovoked, that they'd like to extend Gabe and Ed this offseason.

 

The $$$ might seem high to some, but it's not a top 10 deal and Ed is a young/core player in our defense.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mikie2times said:

That was one of my first thoughts. Maybe freeing up space for Hopkins?

Maybe he's a piece in some trade but the other team wanted him under more contract years and they could have gave Beane a number they'd be willing to pay Oliver.   Can't say that I th ink he earned that money, hoping they know something we don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Simon said:

 

 

You are the only that keeps saying that, which explains quite a bit

 

 

Keep trolling this thread repeatedly with stupid shlt and you get what you deserve 🤷‍♂️

TY Simon... :D 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PrimeTime101 said:

A month ago I said we should extend him, because if he balls out like an Edmunds year last year.. we would not afford him... I GOT SLAMMED for it. 

You get rightfully slammed for all your takes. Every once in a while, one sticks to the wall..

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

I just read that it's the 6th most guaranteed money for a DT.  

 

The opinions in that piece are primarily negative and mirror mine.  

 

Here's a quote from someone in another Bills forum:  

 

 

I generally agree with that.  I don't know what the cap implications are for this year, a lot of times when they make a signing like this it alleviates the cap for this particular season.  The tradeoff is often in guaranteed money.  Not sure how or whether it did that, but that's an awful lot of guaranteed money for Oliver.  If he doesn't improve then it will have proven to have been a bad signing.  


Here's the thing, his biggest knock is that he's undersized, unless this signing makes him get bigger it doesn't alter a glaring weakness.  

 

My first thought was that this was done for future cap reasons combined with a lack of DT talent in our pipeline, really none to speak of, nothing that warrants re-signing in the next couple of years.  

 

If that's the reason why it was done, while acquiescing to seemingly average play at the position, IMO it was a very unwise decision that merely kicks the can of future team-building issues down the road a season or two.  

 

We will see, time will tell.  Not a thing that anyone here says will change anything.  That much we know.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have no reason to doubt you and the 6th highest guaranteed money claim, that is too much guaranteed money for Oliver at this point imho.

 

 Looks like it’s a decision they’ve made based on a multiple of factors, many of which fans are not privy. I’m also hoping making room for an acquisition was part of the decision and that Ed pops off and we feel much better about the contract in November than we do now.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Yeah, I’m not talking about position for say, I’m talking about tying money into the defensive line

 

Since we give this massive contract to Oliver, what does that mean for DaQuan Jones and Poona Ford

Edmonds got straight paid way more than the bills wanted to pay. If Edmonds would’ve taken middle of the pack, middle linebacker money he might still be here.

I am glad he is gone for many reasons

But the first one is that Bills Coaching needed to change up what they were doing on the field.
Overdependent on Tremaine

Now we have no start LB beyond Milano

This season should be fun to see how they play Defense

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, julian said:

I have no reason to doubt you and the 6th highest guaranteed money claim, that is too much guaranteed money for Oliver at this point imho.

 

 Looks like it’s a decision they’ve made based on a multiple of factors, many of which fans are not privy. I’m also hoping making room for an acquisition was part of the decision and that Ed pops off and we feel much better about the contract in November than we do now.

Iirc we said this verbatim last year re Knox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

If you think they wouldn't have kept Edmunds had he not cost $72m, you're kidding yourself.


they had the chance to lock him up (as many teams do of their top 1 st round picks on the roster) last year, his 4th season—for less than that. They chose not to.  So there was no chance they were going pay even more this year. 
 

so nah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

I wanted DaQuan extended. Not thrilled about this contract, but I suppose if he takes a step forward this season it’s fine. Though I see no reason to expect he should. Maybe the staff and front office do from OTA’s 

Jones is key to Olivers success

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoBills808 said:

Iirc we said this verbatim last year re Knox

Yeah I believe the Knox contract isn’t good, I’m not sure if every team doesn’t have contracts they regret, I’d expect they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Simon said:

Watching people that have absolutely zero clue about DT play freak out about this is hilarious. :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

I may not know much about DT play but I've had plenty of opportunities to watch Ed play.  And he's not worth this big a contract. 

Dareus 2.0

Edited by LABILLBACKER
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr. Who said:

Pretty sure @GunnerBill predicting this possibility months ago. He's probably in a pub somewhere.

Gunnerbill is a freaking psychic! Has he predicted bills super bowl yet? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...