Jump to content

The Walls be Closing


Kemp

Recommended Posts

Time to place your bets on who gets him first.

NY - 1/9

GA - 25-1

Feds - 50-1

NY won't even be part of the news when the dust settles. 

With the ruling re the Feds, everyone concerned is going to look to cut deals.

The next chapter of the ***** Show is upon us.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3913007-appeals-court-backs-doj-forcing-trump-attorney-to-aid-documents-probe/  

wall.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Kemp said:

Time to place your bets on who gets him first.

NY - 1/9

GA - 25-1

Feds - 50-1

NY won't even be part of the news when the dust settles. 

With the ruling re the Feds, everyone concerned is going to look to cut deals.

The next chapter of the ***** Show is upon us.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3913007-appeals-court-backs-doj-forcing-trump-attorney-to-aid-documents-probe/  

wall.jpg

 

I'll take no one for 1000-1.  Meaning conviction, not just indictment. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.

 

Since friggin 2016.

 

That's a hell of a long time for the walls to be closing in.

 

:lol:

 

I have no doubt they'll find a way to eventually indict him and burn down the last shred of credibility for our "justice system" in the process.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read several places- all of them very biased- that a witness stated that Bragg was holding back information that would help Trump, before I further speculate is there any liberal site saying the same thing? It seems crazy that a prosection witness would do that 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have read several places- all of them very biased- that a witness stated that Bragg was holding back information that would help Trump, before I further speculate is there any liberal site saying the same thing? It seems crazy that a prosection witness would do that 

I'm not an expert but I read further that the info in question would mot be released until the indictment proceeds.  The defense has no argument for attaining them yet.

 

 

 

Just now, L Ron Burgundy said:

I'm not an expert but I read further that the info in question would mot be released until the indictment proceeds.  The defense has no argument for attaining them yet.

 

 

 

Gotta read further in the thread for more good detail.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PetermansRedemption said:

Isn’t this bad for anyone who votes Democrat though? The best possible matchup for Democrats is Trump vs Biden. Desantis is far more electable than Trump ever was. 


This is the wrong take. Whether or not Trump is potentially an easier candidate to beat doesn’t have any place in the discussion of whether or not he committed crimes. 
 

Also, I’m getting the impression that DeSantis has a glass jaw anyway 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

I'm not an expert but I read further that the info in question would mot be released until the indictment proceeds.  The defense has no argument for attaining them yet.

 

 

 

Gotta read further in the thread for more good detail.

 

 

I am assuming that this is a NYS rule because in Florida the defense has the right to question witnesses in a grand jury situation, though they mostly do not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody else find it hilarious that the National Enquirer owner who bought and buried the story of a prez candidate and a porn star is named Peck&r 😂

15 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Bet on someone not doing something stupid?  LOL.  No thanks.

So no money on it...got it

 

and no one seems to be talking about this.  Odds are pretty bad for trump here as well.  He's a swell guy...

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/13/trump-deposition-in-e-jean-carroll-rape-defamation-case-ordered-unsealed.html

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

😂 anything to keep him in the MSM headlines ….  Anything!!!

 

don’t worry about banks collapsing leading progressives calling for Powell to step down massive layoff rippling through the work place and the recent Biden family document subpoena showing unreported millions funneled to the family from China….  
 

Look over here!!!! Trashy orange man paid off a trashy porn star he banged in 2016!!!! This is what matters!     

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

😂 anything to keep him in the MSM headlines ….  Anything!!!

 

don’t worry about banks collapsing leading progressives calling for Powell to step down massive layoff rippling through the work place and the recent Biden family document subpoena showing unreported millions funneled to the family from China….  
 

Look over here!!!! Trashy orange man paid off a trashy porn star he banged in 2016!!!! This is what matters!     


You seem really upset. I understand Mista Independent.

 

Imagine if YOUR fellow Republicans convicted him after the second impeachment?

 

Once again, it’s everyone else’s fault except Conald Trump. 
 

ETTD

 

Just watch.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Vegas has 92% odds.  maybe u should make a bet.

What are conviction odds and how to bet? I don’t see anything on the FanDuel app. 
 

Finally there is some good comedy on tv again.  This stuff is so surreal it’s hilarious 

 

what are hunters odds on hunters counter suit that the shop with laptop that wasn’t his invaded his privacy 😂 😂 

 

the entire political system is a bumbling keystone cops routine. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

I am assuming that this is a NYS rule because in Florida the defense has the right to question witnesses in a grand jury situation, though they mostly do not. 

Even before the def is indicted?  Isn't that like allowing false starts?  The play hasn't started yet.  I could be off base though.   

 

Where are our resident lawyers?  Heeelp.

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Even before the def is indicted?  Isn't that like allowing false starts?  The play hasn't started yet.  I could be off base though.   

 

Where are our resident lawyers?  Heeelp.

As stated it is a rare occurrence but if the main witness is getting time off their conviction and has previously said the exact opposite, then yes it should be allowed to happen. If the grand jury does not push forward with the case I will be surprised because of how low the threshold is but if this whole can be toppled by a few simple questions than it should not go forward.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Doc said:

 

I'll take no one for 1000-1.  Meaning conviction, not just indictment. 

 

A losing bet.

14 hours ago, Unforgiven said:

1-Killing-Me-Trump-Haters-Having-a-Field

 

1-Killing-Me-Trump-Haters-Having-a-Field

1-Killing-Me-Trump-Haters-Having-a-Field

 

here's some porn for you whack jobs.

Go get a tissue and have fun idiots.


What's it feel like to see the head of your cult go down?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.

 

Since friggin 2016.

 

That's a hell of a long time for the walls to be closing in.

 

:lol:

 

I have no doubt they'll find a way to eventually indict him and burn down the last shred of credibility for our "justice system" in the process.

 

 

 

Good to see you understand he's going down.

Don't worry. You'll get more chances to take up arms against America. 

12 hours ago, BillStime said:

🎯

 

 


Both of us know that Graham will turn on him when he feels it advantageous. Wonder if Trump will out him when he does. Come on. We all know he will.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Doc said:

No GJ today.  Bragg's not going to indict?

 

Even you don't believe that's possible. And it's only the opening act in the play.

10 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

😂 anything to keep him in the MSM headlines ….  Anything!!!

 

don’t worry about banks collapsing leading progressives calling for Powell to step down massive layoff rippling through the work place and the recent Biden family document subpoena showing unreported millions funneled to the family from China….  
 

Look over here!!!! Trashy orange man paid off a trashy porn star he banged in 2016!!!! This is what matters!     


He didn't bang her. He said that a couple days ago. You shouldn't disagree with your beloved.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Rabid.  and their supporters keep eating it up.

 

half the gotcha stories they were reporting on in that clip, ended up being Nothing but media and political stories.

 

And never so much as a peep, let alone a retraction.

 

Just move on to the next fake gotcha narrative.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Kemp said:

A losing bet.

 

Then take it.

 

17 minutes ago, Kemp said:

Even you don't believe that's possible. And it's only the opening act in the play.

 

What's not possible?  Bragg realizing what an idiot he is and refusing to indict Trump and give him the spectacle he wants while pursuing a trumped-up case that has no chance of winning?  Like I said, I won't bet on people not being stupid (indicting him) but again I'll take the bet on not being convicted.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Then take it.

 

 

What's not possible?  Bragg realizing what an idiot he is and refusing to indict Trump and give him the spectacle he wants while pursuing a trumped-up case that has no chance of winning?  Like I said, I won't bet on people not being stupid (indicting him) but again I'll take the bet on not being convicted.

 

How much you good for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still time to make a bet (from CNN)

The Manhattan grand jury investigating Trump’s alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to an adult film star will not hear that case when it convenes today, according to two sources familiar with the matter, pushing the Manhattan’s district attorney’s probe into next week.

After today, the Manhattan grand jury will next convene on Monday, when it is possible they could hear additional testimony from a witness.

The district attorney’s office declined to comment.

Grand juries typically hear multiple cases at a time.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

At 1000-1?  You sure you want to do that? 


1000-1?

Do you understand that you're saying that it's a 1 in 1000 chance that he won't be convicted?

That you're certain he'll be convicted?

I assumed when you offered me the chance to bet that you'd punk out. You've shown the other Trump fanboys that you don't believe he'll beat charges.

Was hoping to make a couple bucks and embarrass you, but at least you've embarrassed yourself.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Kemp said:

1000-1?

Do you understand that you're saying that it's a 1 in 1000 chance that he won't be convicted?

That you're certain he'll be convicted?

I assumed when you offered me the chance to bet that you'd punk out. You've shown the other Trump fanboys that you don't believe he'll beat charges.

Was hoping to make a couple bucks and embarrass you, but at least you've embarrassed yourself.  

 

I said "no one"...will get him and offered you 1000-1 odds, meaning you put up $1000 and I'll put up $1.  We can even make it $100 to $1.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Still time to make a bet (from CNN)

The Manhattan grand jury investigating Trump’s alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to an adult film star will not hear that case when it convenes today, according to two sources familiar with the matter, pushing the Manhattan’s district attorney’s probe into next week.

After today, the Manhattan grand jury will next convene on Monday, when it is possible they could hear additional testimony from a witness.

The district attorney’s office declined to comment.

Grand juries typically hear multiple cases at a time.

How many times CNN sold you all the same BS. but this time, its factual. not just CNN creating stories, AGAIN.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, redtail hawk said:

trump said he'd be arrested Tuesday

check Receipts. Way back when trump was the first to spotlight this, I said he wants it.  gives him that Marter PR that matches his script.  

 

Mr Bragg lacks the foresight to grasp the big picture.

 

Me think someone explained to mr Bragg that a trial, with another NON conviction only helps trump.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...