TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: The thing that is so frustrating about these conversations is that to forced birth crowd just resorts to strawmen arguments as opposed to actually advocating for things that would fix the problem they proclaim to care about. It's how you know they don't really care and stopping abortions isn't really the goal. I'm starting to think you are dense. I advocate for taking it much more seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 1 minute ago, TSOL said: I'm starting to think you are dense. I advocate for taking it much more seriously. You have no answers, only platitudes about "morals" and "personal responsibility". What a mess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: You have no answers, only platitudes about "morals" and "personal responsibility". What a mess. I gave answers! I have a plan! You just don't like it! Plus... You are an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 14, 2022 Author Share Posted November 14, 2022 6 minutes ago, TSOL said: I'm starting to think you are dense. I advocate for taking it much more seriously. I take this issue VERY seriously. My wife has a condition that increases the likelihood of a miscarriage. Before she was diagnosed, she had had five miscarriages. And now, in states enacting GOP abortion laws, we are seeing women experiencing miscarriages sent home until they are so sick their life can be considered to be in danger and only then will they be treated. If such a law were to be passed nationally, we would likely have to stop trying to start a family. If you doubt this, try reading the 80+ cases linked at the start of this thread. All of this, because the GOP does not care about actually stopping abortions. Because the GOP cannot or will not look at the root causes of abortions and will instead pass poorly worded laws that legislate medical treatment that they do not understand, endangering women's lives. If YOU took this seriously, you would look at what ACTUALLY drives elective abortions and I bet you and I could come to agreement on policies to prevent them. But you are unserious, uneducated, and oblivious to the consequences of the half-baked policies you advocate for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 5 minutes ago, TSOL said: I gave answers! I have a plan! You just don't like it! Plus... You are an idiot Thanks, Tom. You in favor of paying for the babies you force into existence? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 Just now, Gene Frenkle said: Thanks, Tom. You in favor of paying for the babies you force into existence? Tf arw .you talking about. $3500 dollars Make it expensive. Like over-regulated cars with an average price of a new car being 45,000 dollars now. Sh1ts expensive. Make abortions expensive De-incentivize them 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 Yeah, @ChiGoose, God forbid people face consequences for their actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 14, 2022 Author Share Posted November 14, 2022 7 minutes ago, TSOL said: Yeah, @ChiGoose, God forbid people face consequences for their actions. I don’t know if you’re just dense or an ####### but you keep proving my point either way, so carry on embarrassing yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 15 hours ago, TSOL said: Tf arw .you talking about. $3500 dollars Make it expensive. Like over-regulated cars with an average price of a new car being 45,000 dollars now. Sh1ts expensive. Make abortions expensive De-incentivize them Not what I asked, and that does not answer the question. You're telling me how you would make abortion prohibitive. It doesn't matter how you make it prohibitive, but once you do, are you willing to help pay for the result through entitlements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 27 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Not what I asked, and that does not answer the question. You're telling me how you would make abortion prohibitive. It doesn't matter how you make it prohibitive, but once you do, are you willing to help pay for the result through entitlements? We are already paying exorbitant amounts of money we don't have, so sure. Yes Fully willing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 1 minute ago, TSOL said: We are already paying exorbitant amounts of money we don't have, so sure. Yes Fully willing Haha...that wasn't so hard, now was it? A pro-entitlement Republican. Now I've seen everything. You must really love Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 6 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Haha...that wasn't so hard, now was it? A pro-entitlement Republican. Now I've seen everything. You must really love Jesus. Get back to me when you start making sense, ok? Because I really don't understand where you are coming from, or going to with this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 18, 2022 Share Posted November 18, 2022 3 hours ago, B-Man said: So long to hypocrites. . . . . . . . . So she was only elected to represent Catholics? Idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 18, 2022 Share Posted November 18, 2022 42 minutes ago, BillStime said: So she was only elected to represent Catholics? Idiots Ok should be a dollar for you but I’m taking 75 cents away due to hate example #15. Don’t spend your quarter all in one place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 18, 2022 Share Posted November 18, 2022 8 hours ago, B-Man said: So long to hypocrites. . . . . . . . . If someone doesn't have the exact same religious values as you, you call that person a hypocrite. Instead, perhaps you're both just immature dupes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted November 18, 2022 Share Posted November 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Gene Frenkle said: If someone doesn't have the exact same religious values as you, you call that person a hypocrite. Instead, perhaps you're both just immature dupes. Exactly wrong. If someone behaves in a manner contradictory their own professed and expressed belief, that is hypocritical. Someone else's religious views don't enter into it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 10, 2022 Share Posted December 10, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted December 10, 2022 Share Posted December 10, 2022 On 11/18/2022 at 1:12 AM, Gene Frenkle said: If someone doesn't have the exact same religious values as you, you call that person a hypocrite. Instead, perhaps you're both just immature dupes. Wrong. The doctrine is the doctrine, regardless of who follows it. In terms of Catholicism, she’s not devout. She may have simply mislabeled herself or perhaps is confused as to what it means. However, she’s not what she claimed to be or described herself as. I am not religious and I never claim to be, but why say you’re a devout Catholic if you’re not ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 10, 2022 Share Posted December 10, 2022 JFC - listening to MAGA talk about religion and politics... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 Selective enforcement. . . . . . . . . . a common sign of the Left. The Justice Department has been targeting pro-life activists through the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act as a response to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, according to Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta. Gupta delivered remarks at the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division’s 65th Anniversary earlier this month. The associate attorney general described the overturn of Roe v. Wade as a “devastating blow to women throughout the country” that took away “the constitutional right to abortion” and increased “the urgency” of the DOJ’s work—including the “enforcement of the FACE Act, to ensure continued lawful access to reproductive services.” She did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Daily Signal. The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division enforces the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, which “prohibits threats of force, obstruction and property damage intended to interfere with reproductive health care services.” It protects BOTH pro-life pregnancy centers and abortion clinics, as a DOJ official noted to Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, last week. At least 98 Catholic churches and 77 pregnancy resource centers and other pro-life organizations have been attacked since May, but the DOJ has apparently not charged a single person in connection with these attacks. Meanwhile, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has charged 26 pro-life individuals with FACE Act violations this year. The DOJ has not responded to The Daily Signal’s requests for comment on this point. Pregnancy resource centers are typically run by pro-life women who seek to offer expectant mothers alternatives to abortion. Such centers provide diapers, baby clothes, and resources for both mothers and fathers, empowering them to care for their child, overcome addictions, build community, and find jobs. https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/12/12/doj-official-admits-targeting-pro-lifers-is-response-to-overturn-of-roe/?utm_source=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=doj-official-admits-targeting-pro-lifers-is-response-to-overturn-of-roe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 15, 2022 Share Posted December 15, 2022 Quote Conservatives complain abortion bans not enforced, want jail time for pill ‘trafficking’ Many antiabortion advocates fear that the growing availability of illegal abortion pills has undercut their landmark Supreme Court victory overturning Roe v. Wade. Now they are grasping for new ways to crack down on those breaking the law. By Caroline Kitchener https://www.washingtonpost.com/ The largest antiabortion organization in Texas has created a team of advocates assigned to investigate citizens who might be distributing abortion pills illegally. Students for Life of America, a leading national antiabortion group, is making plans to systematically test the water Erin Brockovich-style in several large U.S. cities, searching for contaminants they say result from medication abortion. And Republican lawmakers in Texas are preparing to introduce legislation that would require internet providers to block abortion pill websites in the same way they can censor child pornography. Nearly six months since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, triggering abortion bans in more than a dozen states, many antiabortion advocates fear that the growing availability of illegal abortion pills has undercut their landmark victory. Now they are grasping for new ways to crack down on those breaking the law. Antiabortion advocates had hoped the June decision would significantly decrease the number of abortions in the United States. But abortion rights activists have ramped up efforts to funnel abortion pills — a two-step regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol that is widely regarded as safe — into states with strict new bans, working with rapidly expanding international suppliers as well as U.S.-based distributors to meet demand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 Evil creates evil. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 21, 2022 Share Posted December 21, 2022 The rest of the story… Idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 1, 2023 Share Posted January 1, 2023 Scary when Trump is right for a change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 Fantastic ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 I look forward to our resident children's response. Black Democrat State Representative Blasts 'Systemically Racist Abortion Industry' in Powerful Rebuff By Mike Miller Oh, this is a gonna be a problem. A black Democrat woman (I’m not a biologist but I’m calling it, nonetheless), blistering the baby-killing business is bad enough— in the eyes of the left, that is. But then, calling abortion “racist,” which is disproportionately true? Totally unacceptable, to say the least. And that’s just for starters. Connecticut State Representative Treneé McGee told thousands of pro-life activists at the March for Life rally on Friday that black women of the pro-life movement are actively exposing the “systemically racist abortion industry.” And that’s just for starters. Connecticut State Representative Treneé McGee told thousands of pro-life activists at the March for Life rally on Friday that black women of the pro-life movement are actively exposing the “systemically racist abortion industry.” As reported by the Tennessee Star, McGee, one of 14 Connecticut state House Democrats – among them, 10 people of color – who voted against an April bill to further expand abortion rights in the state, fired up the crowd in an address that bluntly accused the abortion industry and Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, of racism. Needless to say, racist or not, Planned Parenthood gleefully continues Sanger’s mission. As McGee rose to speak against the bill, she recalled numerous conversations she’d had with black girls about abortion over the years. Quote They were taught about abortion as a birth control method. They were taught that at any point in time, when they were 13 or 12 or 15, that they could go to a Planned Parenthood and receive an abortion without their parents knowing. Powerful? It got even better — with facts: Quote I want to speak to the history of this industry and why I think it’s destructive to my community. Black women make up 14 percent of child-bearing populations yet obtained 36.2 percent of all reported abortions. Black women have the highest abortion ratio in the country – 474 abortions per 1,000 live births. Think about that: a Democrat debating other Democrats with facts. Damn. I mean Democrats loathe facts, data, history, logic, and comment sense that flies in the face of their concocted narratives, right? https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2023/01/21/black-democrat-state-representative-blasts-systemically-racist-abortion-industry-in-powerful-rebuff-n691923 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 22, 2023 Share Posted January 22, 2023 🎯 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Barack Obama emphasizes the importance of preserving abortion ‘for generations to come’ For the first time in 50 years, pro-abortion activists watched the March for Life and feared that their longtime grip on the national abortion narrative might be loosening. Few things terrify the more than the prospect of more babies being born, particularly minority babies. That’s what makes it so weird — although not surprising — to see former President Barack Obama going to bat so hard for preserving the “right” to abort more black babies. And that’s effectively what he did here: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 26, 2023 Share Posted January 26, 2023 Ever since Roe was overturned (we so love writing those words), we have watched as pro-aborts, media, Democrats, the Left (etc) lied over and over again about how this decision will LITERALLY KILL WOMEN because of ectopic pregnancies and women being kept like CATTLE in evil red states. DA DA DAAAA! Yeah, they’re disgusting, gross lies but what else would we expect from a bunch of people who would exploit miscarriages to push abortion? PoliMath, a longtime Twitchy favorite and one smart cat, shared this very powerful and sad thread about his friend that debunks these nasty lies about red states. Seems like someone here was pushing this lie last summer, I can't remember who though. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2023/01/26/polimath-tweets-thread-decimating-pro-abort-media-lies-about-ectopic-pregnancies-and-red-states/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Um ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 14, 2023 Share Posted February 14, 2023 Any GOP nominee for presidency will have to get down on their knees and promise the anti-Abortion people they are true believers. Heavy cross to bear in a general election. Good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted February 14, 2023 Share Posted February 14, 2023 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Any GOP nominee for presidency will have to get down on their knees and promise the anti-Abortion people they are true believers. Heavy cross to bear in a general election. Good So by that you’re saying that the Democrats have evolved from being Pro-Choice to being Pro-Abortion? Not a good look. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 14, 2023 Share Posted February 14, 2023 38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: So by that you’re saying that the Democrats have evolved from being Pro-Choice to being Pro-Abortion? Not a good look. Neither is them wanting to be able to kill babies all the way up to right after they're born. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 14, 2023 Share Posted February 14, 2023 43 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: So by that you’re saying that the Democrats have evolved from being Pro-Choice to being Pro-Abortion? Not a good look. Pro-choice, a good look A winner on election day 4 minutes ago, Doc said: Neither is them wanting to be able to kill babies all the way up to right after they're born. That's the rhetoric that will hold the "pro-life" sheep in line. Next they can try and cut health care! Pro-what? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 15, 2023 Share Posted February 15, 2023 11 hours ago, Tiberius said: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 15, 2023 Share Posted February 15, 2023 11 hours ago, B-Man said: This is a fail. This argument is basically worthless. It will rally some racist to make them feel they know better, or something, but it ain't helping ya'all out in a general election And Margaret Sanger was a birth control advocate who was arrested for saying women had a right to birth control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted February 15, 2023 Share Posted February 15, 2023 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: This is a fail. This argument is basically worthless. It will rally some racist to make them feel they know better, or something, but it ain't helping ya'all out in a general election And Margaret Sanger was a birth control advocate who was arrested for saying women had a right to birth control Sanger was a Eugenics supporter. was on record a LOT. its why they needed Cathy Hepburn to help with the PR aspect 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 15, 2023 Share Posted February 15, 2023 5 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Sanger was a Eugenics supporter. was on record a LOT. its why they needed Cathy Hepburn to help with the PR aspect To a point, her main focus by far was birth control. She went to jail fighting for that, not eugenics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts