Process Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Can you cut injured players? McKenzie is not good enough to put up with this BS. Goodbye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoTom Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 1 minute ago, HereComesTheReignAgain said: When did willful ignorance become something to brag about? About four years ago. 4 1 5 7 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted August 26, 2021 Author Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just now, Process said: Can you cut injured players? McKenzie is not good enough to put up with this BS. Goodbye. Yes you can Waived/Injured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blainorama5 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Eastport bills said: Beasley has to take one for the team. He has expressed his feelings about choice, and as a citizen outside of the NFL, that's perfectly fine. Unfortunately, he has a team's fortunes in his hands because of NFL protocols. It becomes a commitment to your teammates and the fans, who pay your salary, issue. It's a privilege to play in the league. Agreed. Are you a team player or not!? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Process Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just now, MAJBobby said: Yes you can Waived/Injured Cya!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Here is another thing. Could this play in to roster Decisions. Lets Say Marquez Stevenson is vaxxed and therefore not subject to the enhance rules that Beasley and McKenzie have at least ignored once. McKenzie is on a 1 year deal.... So Cut Down day, the decision comes down between Stevenson and McKenzie. Would the Team look at the Risk, they know Beasley is going to do Beasley at this point, would they want a guy that is less risk according to the protocols behind him (Stevenson) or would they go with evidently the more risky choice in McKenzie. I would think that Risk HAS to be thought about when making the final 53. Pretty sure Beane came under fire for saying this is exactly how it will go. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted August 26, 2021 Author Share Posted August 26, 2021 "Process" "Team DNA" are all those just lip service? sure seems it for some players 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 13 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Dont forget TD Jesus LOL How about we call Kumerow “TD Jake”😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krf139 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Cole "took one for the team" last year by playing hobbled in the playoffs. He's entitled to his opinions and to express them, just like anyone else. But I find it disingenuous for people to say he's not team-first. Many of the people making these claims are likely the same ones lauding him for his toughness in the playoffs and hoping and wishing he'd make it back. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and to express them freely. 2 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmotionallyUnstable Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 17 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: And we now know 3 of our top 5 receivers are unvacced and face potential isolation periods. Worrying. When it is one guy in a room it is liveable. Imagine an outbreak in the receiver room during the season - we'd be down to Diggs, Sanders and guys off the street. This is a reason I think they could keep 7 WRs 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 This is the crazy bit... they did it when people checking up where actually there. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted August 26, 2021 Author Share Posted August 26, 2021 Can we SERIOUSLY have a football discussion on the issue without this???? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said: This is the crazy bit... they did it when people checking up where actually there. They call it entitlement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Under no circumstances do I want to Cole and McKenzie off this team… …is what I keep telling myself. But damn, I honestly can say they are approaching cut candidacy for me. If we weren’t a major SB contender, maybe you can risk it more. But the season is shortest in all of major professional team sports, you can not afford to give away any games. Not to mention it’s one and done in the playoffs. The idea a flat out refusal to comply with a simple rule such as just wear a mask indoors can seriously impact our odds of reaching our goals as a team is something I find unacceptable. You don’t trust the the shot because it’s not FDA approved, fine…except it is FDA approved now. You still don’t trust the shot because a new reason you came up with, once again fine, that’s your choice. But not complying with the mandated SAFETY PROTOCOLS that are there so those can have a choice of not getting the shot is unacceptable. This isn’t about not trusting a vaccine anymore, this is about throwing a tantrum because you don’t like rules and won’t follow them. No one is making them get the shot, so just follow the damn protocols that come with that freedom of choice. Seriously over this nonsense. 6 3 4 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just now, Solomon Grundy said: They call it entitlement It's very odd. Agree or disagree on whether the protocols are right at the moment but this comes across as undisciplined for McBeane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 If they have to forfeit a game and not get paid they will take it serious and face the wrath of the fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Can the Bills, at least, try to get compensation by trading them before cutting/waiving🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted August 26, 2021 Author Share Posted August 26, 2021 I Do think there is a way to move on from BOTH Beasley and McKenzie if that is what the FO decides. WR - Diggs / Kumerow Slot - Sanders / Stevenson WR - Davis / This is the spot a little up in the air Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thandGoal Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 20 minutes ago, Jobot said: Thank god we've got Josh Allen. I dont think Josh Allen got the shot(s) yet either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALLEN1QB Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 25 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: And we now know 3 of our top 5 receivers are unvacced and face potential isolation periods. Worrying. When it is one guy in a room it is liveable. Imagine an outbreak in the receiver room during the season - we'd be down to Diggs, Sanders and guys off the street. Selfish conduct by narcissistic individuals 1 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts